Spatial Language, Question Type, and Young Children�s Ability to Describe Clothing

Legal and Developmental Implications

Stacia Roosevelt, Kelly McWilliams, Thomas D. Lyon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Children�s descriptions of clothing placement and touching with respect to clothing are central to assessing child sexual abuse allegations. This study examined children�s ability to answer the types of questions attorneys and interviewers typically ask about clothing, using the most common spatial terms (on/off, outside/inside, over/under). Ninety-seven 3- to 6-year-olds were asked yes/no (e.g., �Is the shirt on?�), forced-choice (e.g., �Is the shirt on or off?�), open-choice (e.g., �Is the shirt on or off or something else?�), or where questions (e.g., �Where is the shirt?�) about clothing using a human figurine, clothing, and stickers. Across question types, children generally did well with simple clothing or sticker placement (e.g., pants completely on), except for yes/no questions about �over,� suggesting children had an underinclusive understanding of the word. When clothing or sticker placement was intermediate (e.g., pants around ankles, and therefore neither completely on nor off), children performed poorly except when asked where questions. A similar task using only stickers and boxes, analogous to forensic interviewers� assessments of children�s understanding, was only weakly predictive of children�s ability to describe clothing. The results suggest that common methods of questioning young children about clothing may lead to substantial misinterpretation. (PsycINFO Database Record

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 2 2017

Fingerprint

Clothing
Aptitude
clothing
Language
ability
language
Interviews
Spatial Language
Question Types
Sexual Child Abuse
Lawyers
interview
Ankle
sexual violence
Shirt

Keywords

  • child sexual abuse
  • investigative interviewing
  • spatial language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Spatial Language, Question Type, and Young Children�s Ability to Describe Clothing : Legal and Developmental Implications. / Roosevelt, Stacia; McWilliams, Kelly; Lyon, Thomas D.

In: Law and Human Behavior, 02.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{910d57736ea742718a442f665971a738,
title = "Spatial Language, Question Type, and Young Children�s Ability to Describe Clothing: Legal and Developmental Implications",
abstract = "Children�s descriptions of clothing placement and touching with respect to clothing are central to assessing child sexual abuse allegations. This study examined children�s ability to answer the types of questions attorneys and interviewers typically ask about clothing, using the most common spatial terms (on/off, outside/inside, over/under). Ninety-seven 3- to 6-year-olds were asked yes/no (e.g., �Is the shirt on?�), forced-choice (e.g., �Is the shirt on or off?�), open-choice (e.g., �Is the shirt on or off or something else?�), or where questions (e.g., �Where is the shirt?�) about clothing using a human figurine, clothing, and stickers. Across question types, children generally did well with simple clothing or sticker placement (e.g., pants completely on), except for yes/no questions about �over,� suggesting children had an underinclusive understanding of the word. When clothing or sticker placement was intermediate (e.g., pants around ankles, and therefore neither completely on nor off), children performed poorly except when asked where questions. A similar task using only stickers and boxes, analogous to forensic interviewers� assessments of children�s understanding, was only weakly predictive of children�s ability to describe clothing. The results suggest that common methods of questioning young children about clothing may lead to substantial misinterpretation. (PsycINFO Database Record",
keywords = "child sexual abuse, investigative interviewing, spatial language",
author = "Stacia Roosevelt and Kelly McWilliams and Lyon, {Thomas D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1037/lhb0000237",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial Language, Question Type, and Young Children�s Ability to Describe Clothing

T2 - Legal and Developmental Implications

AU - Roosevelt, Stacia

AU - McWilliams, Kelly

AU - Lyon, Thomas D.

PY - 2017/2/2

Y1 - 2017/2/2

N2 - Children�s descriptions of clothing placement and touching with respect to clothing are central to assessing child sexual abuse allegations. This study examined children�s ability to answer the types of questions attorneys and interviewers typically ask about clothing, using the most common spatial terms (on/off, outside/inside, over/under). Ninety-seven 3- to 6-year-olds were asked yes/no (e.g., �Is the shirt on?�), forced-choice (e.g., �Is the shirt on or off?�), open-choice (e.g., �Is the shirt on or off or something else?�), or where questions (e.g., �Where is the shirt?�) about clothing using a human figurine, clothing, and stickers. Across question types, children generally did well with simple clothing or sticker placement (e.g., pants completely on), except for yes/no questions about �over,� suggesting children had an underinclusive understanding of the word. When clothing or sticker placement was intermediate (e.g., pants around ankles, and therefore neither completely on nor off), children performed poorly except when asked where questions. A similar task using only stickers and boxes, analogous to forensic interviewers� assessments of children�s understanding, was only weakly predictive of children�s ability to describe clothing. The results suggest that common methods of questioning young children about clothing may lead to substantial misinterpretation. (PsycINFO Database Record

AB - Children�s descriptions of clothing placement and touching with respect to clothing are central to assessing child sexual abuse allegations. This study examined children�s ability to answer the types of questions attorneys and interviewers typically ask about clothing, using the most common spatial terms (on/off, outside/inside, over/under). Ninety-seven 3- to 6-year-olds were asked yes/no (e.g., �Is the shirt on?�), forced-choice (e.g., �Is the shirt on or off?�), open-choice (e.g., �Is the shirt on or off or something else?�), or where questions (e.g., �Where is the shirt?�) about clothing using a human figurine, clothing, and stickers. Across question types, children generally did well with simple clothing or sticker placement (e.g., pants completely on), except for yes/no questions about �over,� suggesting children had an underinclusive understanding of the word. When clothing or sticker placement was intermediate (e.g., pants around ankles, and therefore neither completely on nor off), children performed poorly except when asked where questions. A similar task using only stickers and boxes, analogous to forensic interviewers� assessments of children�s understanding, was only weakly predictive of children�s ability to describe clothing. The results suggest that common methods of questioning young children about clothing may lead to substantial misinterpretation. (PsycINFO Database Record

KW - child sexual abuse

KW - investigative interviewing

KW - spatial language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011369884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011369884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/lhb0000237

DO - 10.1037/lhb0000237

M3 - Article

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

ER -