Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments

A review

Margaret E. Andrew, Michael A. Wulder, Trisalyn Nelson, Nicholas C. Coops

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Operational use of the ecosystem service (ES) concept in conservation and planning requires quantitative assessments based on accurate mapping of ESs. Our goal is to review spatial assessments of ESs, with an emphasis on the socioecological drivers of ESs, the spatial datasets commonly used to represent those drivers, and the methodological approaches used to spatially model ESs. We conclude that diverse strategies, integrating both spatial and aspatial data, have been used to map ES supply and human demand. Model parameters representing abiotic ecosystem properties can be supported by use of well-developed and widely available spatial datasets. Land-cover data, often manipulated or subject to modeling in a GIS, is the most common input for ES modeling; however, assessments are increasingly informed by a mechanistic understanding of the relationships between drivers and services. We suggest that ES assessments are potentially weakened by the simplifying assumptions often needed to translate between conceptual models and widely used spatial data. Adoption of quantitative spatial data that more directly represent ecosystem properties may improve parameterization of mechanistic ES models and increase confidence in ES assessments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)344-373
Number of pages30
JournalGIScience and Remote Sensing
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

spatial data
ecosystem service
ecosystem
modeling
need
data analysis
parameterization
land cover
GIS

Keywords

  • ecological processes
  • ecosystem function
  • ecosystem services
  • land cover
  • satellite
  • spatial data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments : A review. / Andrew, Margaret E.; Wulder, Michael A.; Nelson, Trisalyn; Coops, Nicholas C.

In: GIScience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 52, No. 3, 04.05.2015, p. 344-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Andrew, Margaret E. ; Wulder, Michael A. ; Nelson, Trisalyn ; Coops, Nicholas C. / Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments : A review. In: GIScience and Remote Sensing. 2015 ; Vol. 52, No. 3. pp. 344-373.
@article{9a09d8fa4d0c4c2d9c42fff7a0a82bf1,
title = "Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments: A review",
abstract = "Operational use of the ecosystem service (ES) concept in conservation and planning requires quantitative assessments based on accurate mapping of ESs. Our goal is to review spatial assessments of ESs, with an emphasis on the socioecological drivers of ESs, the spatial datasets commonly used to represent those drivers, and the methodological approaches used to spatially model ESs. We conclude that diverse strategies, integrating both spatial and aspatial data, have been used to map ES supply and human demand. Model parameters representing abiotic ecosystem properties can be supported by use of well-developed and widely available spatial datasets. Land-cover data, often manipulated or subject to modeling in a GIS, is the most common input for ES modeling; however, assessments are increasingly informed by a mechanistic understanding of the relationships between drivers and services. We suggest that ES assessments are potentially weakened by the simplifying assumptions often needed to translate between conceptual models and widely used spatial data. Adoption of quantitative spatial data that more directly represent ecosystem properties may improve parameterization of mechanistic ES models and increase confidence in ES assessments.",
keywords = "ecological processes, ecosystem function, ecosystem services, land cover, satellite, spatial data",
author = "Andrew, {Margaret E.} and Wulder, {Michael A.} and Trisalyn Nelson and Coops, {Nicholas C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/15481603.2015.1033809",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "344--373",
journal = "GIScience and Remote Sensing",
issn = "1548-1603",
publisher = "Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments

T2 - A review

AU - Andrew, Margaret E.

AU - Wulder, Michael A.

AU - Nelson, Trisalyn

AU - Coops, Nicholas C.

PY - 2015/5/4

Y1 - 2015/5/4

N2 - Operational use of the ecosystem service (ES) concept in conservation and planning requires quantitative assessments based on accurate mapping of ESs. Our goal is to review spatial assessments of ESs, with an emphasis on the socioecological drivers of ESs, the spatial datasets commonly used to represent those drivers, and the methodological approaches used to spatially model ESs. We conclude that diverse strategies, integrating both spatial and aspatial data, have been used to map ES supply and human demand. Model parameters representing abiotic ecosystem properties can be supported by use of well-developed and widely available spatial datasets. Land-cover data, often manipulated or subject to modeling in a GIS, is the most common input for ES modeling; however, assessments are increasingly informed by a mechanistic understanding of the relationships between drivers and services. We suggest that ES assessments are potentially weakened by the simplifying assumptions often needed to translate between conceptual models and widely used spatial data. Adoption of quantitative spatial data that more directly represent ecosystem properties may improve parameterization of mechanistic ES models and increase confidence in ES assessments.

AB - Operational use of the ecosystem service (ES) concept in conservation and planning requires quantitative assessments based on accurate mapping of ESs. Our goal is to review spatial assessments of ESs, with an emphasis on the socioecological drivers of ESs, the spatial datasets commonly used to represent those drivers, and the methodological approaches used to spatially model ESs. We conclude that diverse strategies, integrating both spatial and aspatial data, have been used to map ES supply and human demand. Model parameters representing abiotic ecosystem properties can be supported by use of well-developed and widely available spatial datasets. Land-cover data, often manipulated or subject to modeling in a GIS, is the most common input for ES modeling; however, assessments are increasingly informed by a mechanistic understanding of the relationships between drivers and services. We suggest that ES assessments are potentially weakened by the simplifying assumptions often needed to translate between conceptual models and widely used spatial data. Adoption of quantitative spatial data that more directly represent ecosystem properties may improve parameterization of mechanistic ES models and increase confidence in ES assessments.

KW - ecological processes

KW - ecosystem function

KW - ecosystem services

KW - land cover

KW - satellite

KW - spatial data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928716494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928716494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15481603.2015.1033809

DO - 10.1080/15481603.2015.1033809

M3 - Review article

VL - 52

SP - 344

EP - 373

JO - GIScience and Remote Sensing

JF - GIScience and Remote Sensing

SN - 1548-1603

IS - 3

ER -