Some relationships between gage R&R criteria

William H. Woodall, Connie M. Borror

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, several commonly used gage repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) acceptance criteria are discussed. The number of distinct categories (ndc) is equivalent to an acceptance criterion based on another standard metric, the ratio of the estimated measurement system standard deviation to the estimated overall standard deviation of the measurements. This implies that the criterion based on ndc could be considered redundant. Several acceptance criteria are revisited and compared, including a discussion of more objective measures of capability based on misclassification rates. The relationship between ndc and the discrimination ratio is also given.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-106
Number of pages8
JournalQuality and Reliability Engineering International
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Gages
Acceptance
Standard deviation

Keywords

  • Gage R&R study
  • Gauge studies
  • Measurement system analysis
  • Misclassification rates
  • Variance components

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering (miscellaneous)
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Some relationships between gage R&R criteria. / Woodall, William H.; Borror, Connie M.

In: Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 24, No. 1, 02.2008, p. 99-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woodall, William H. ; Borror, Connie M. / Some relationships between gage R&R criteria. In: Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 2008 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 99-106.
@article{0231c95b71d94fe1800bf1c046341c4b,
title = "Some relationships between gage R&R criteria",
abstract = "In this paper, several commonly used gage repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) acceptance criteria are discussed. The number of distinct categories (ndc) is equivalent to an acceptance criterion based on another standard metric, the ratio of the estimated measurement system standard deviation to the estimated overall standard deviation of the measurements. This implies that the criterion based on ndc could be considered redundant. Several acceptance criteria are revisited and compared, including a discussion of more objective measures of capability based on misclassification rates. The relationship between ndc and the discrimination ratio is also given.",
keywords = "Gage R&R study, Gauge studies, Measurement system analysis, Misclassification rates, Variance components",
author = "Woodall, {William H.} and Borror, {Connie M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/qre.870",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "99--106",
journal = "Quality and Reliability Engineering International",
issn = "0748-8017",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some relationships between gage R&R criteria

AU - Woodall, William H.

AU - Borror, Connie M.

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - In this paper, several commonly used gage repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) acceptance criteria are discussed. The number of distinct categories (ndc) is equivalent to an acceptance criterion based on another standard metric, the ratio of the estimated measurement system standard deviation to the estimated overall standard deviation of the measurements. This implies that the criterion based on ndc could be considered redundant. Several acceptance criteria are revisited and compared, including a discussion of more objective measures of capability based on misclassification rates. The relationship between ndc and the discrimination ratio is also given.

AB - In this paper, several commonly used gage repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) acceptance criteria are discussed. The number of distinct categories (ndc) is equivalent to an acceptance criterion based on another standard metric, the ratio of the estimated measurement system standard deviation to the estimated overall standard deviation of the measurements. This implies that the criterion based on ndc could be considered redundant. Several acceptance criteria are revisited and compared, including a discussion of more objective measures of capability based on misclassification rates. The relationship between ndc and the discrimination ratio is also given.

KW - Gage R&R study

KW - Gauge studies

KW - Measurement system analysis

KW - Misclassification rates

KW - Variance components

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40549119509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40549119509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/qre.870

DO - 10.1002/qre.870

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:40549119509

VL - 24

SP - 99

EP - 106

JO - Quality and Reliability Engineering International

JF - Quality and Reliability Engineering International

SN - 0748-8017

IS - 1

ER -