Abstract

As governments around the world struggle to govern a multitude of emerging technologies, they often seek to harmonize their regulatory approaches. But there are at least 10 different reasons why nations may seek to harmonize their oversight of a specific technology, and discerning which of these rationales will apply to a specific technology is critical for selecting the optimal harmonization approach. The traditional approach is the negotiation of formal international treaties, but, as exemplified by the challenges of cybersecurity, such treaty-based approaches are too resource-intensive and difficult to be effective for most technologies. Accordingly, a new generation of more informal international governance tools are being explored, often grouped under the term "soft law." They include private standards, guidelines, codes of conduct, and forums for transnational dialogue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-114
Number of pages7
JournalBulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Volume73
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2017

Fingerprint

Law
international agreement
harmonization
treaty
dialogue
governance
resources

Keywords

  • Asymmetric warfare
  • Crispr
  • Cybersecurity
  • International harmonization
  • Regulations
  • Soft law
  • Treaties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Soft law : New tools for governing emerging technologies. / Marchant, Gary; Allenby, Braden.

In: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 73, No. 2, 04.03.2017, p. 108-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{98795ac32f5649c9ba5111ab8bb1f763,
title = "Soft law: New tools for governing emerging technologies",
abstract = "As governments around the world struggle to govern a multitude of emerging technologies, they often seek to harmonize their regulatory approaches. But there are at least 10 different reasons why nations may seek to harmonize their oversight of a specific technology, and discerning which of these rationales will apply to a specific technology is critical for selecting the optimal harmonization approach. The traditional approach is the negotiation of formal international treaties, but, as exemplified by the challenges of cybersecurity, such treaty-based approaches are too resource-intensive and difficult to be effective for most technologies. Accordingly, a new generation of more informal international governance tools are being explored, often grouped under the term {"}soft law.{"} They include private standards, guidelines, codes of conduct, and forums for transnational dialogue.",
keywords = "Asymmetric warfare, Crispr, Cybersecurity, International harmonization, Regulations, Soft law, Treaties",
author = "Gary Marchant and Braden Allenby",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/00963402.2017.1288447",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "108--114",
journal = "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists",
issn = "0096-3402",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soft law

T2 - New tools for governing emerging technologies

AU - Marchant, Gary

AU - Allenby, Braden

PY - 2017/3/4

Y1 - 2017/3/4

N2 - As governments around the world struggle to govern a multitude of emerging technologies, they often seek to harmonize their regulatory approaches. But there are at least 10 different reasons why nations may seek to harmonize their oversight of a specific technology, and discerning which of these rationales will apply to a specific technology is critical for selecting the optimal harmonization approach. The traditional approach is the negotiation of formal international treaties, but, as exemplified by the challenges of cybersecurity, such treaty-based approaches are too resource-intensive and difficult to be effective for most technologies. Accordingly, a new generation of more informal international governance tools are being explored, often grouped under the term "soft law." They include private standards, guidelines, codes of conduct, and forums for transnational dialogue.

AB - As governments around the world struggle to govern a multitude of emerging technologies, they often seek to harmonize their regulatory approaches. But there are at least 10 different reasons why nations may seek to harmonize their oversight of a specific technology, and discerning which of these rationales will apply to a specific technology is critical for selecting the optimal harmonization approach. The traditional approach is the negotiation of formal international treaties, but, as exemplified by the challenges of cybersecurity, such treaty-based approaches are too resource-intensive and difficult to be effective for most technologies. Accordingly, a new generation of more informal international governance tools are being explored, often grouped under the term "soft law." They include private standards, guidelines, codes of conduct, and forums for transnational dialogue.

KW - Asymmetric warfare

KW - Crispr

KW - Cybersecurity

KW - International harmonization

KW - Regulations

KW - Soft law

KW - Treaties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012910075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012910075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00963402.2017.1288447

DO - 10.1080/00963402.2017.1288447

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 108

EP - 114

JO - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

JF - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

SN - 0096-3402

IS - 2

ER -