Sociality in bees

William Wcislo, Jennifer Fewell

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The most common image that comes to mind with the term “bee” is the honey bee, Apis mellifera, with its highly derived and well-studied eusocial organization. The diversity of social organization among bees and near relatives (Apoidea), however, is much richer and extensive. The “bees” (Anthophila, within the superfamily Apoidea) include approximately 20,000 species forming a monophyletic clade with a likely single ancestral origin (Danforth, et al., 2006). Ecologically, all bees rely on floral resources to survive, and share a relatively common body plan, related to their reliance on flight as their primary form of locomotion. These commonalities belie their incredible social diversity. The basal (plesiomorphic) and most common life history form in this taxon is actually solitary living. Across the bee phylogeny, however, there are multiple and diverse taxa in which adult females form social alliances without reproductive castes (primarily communal sociality), and diverse taxa have independently evolved reproductive caste-based eusocial societies. Beyond these general categories, bee species vary considerably in how they form social groups and in the specific behaviors they perform cooperatively. Sociality has appeared and been lost multiple times in different lineages, and the expression of sociality can vary within a single species or even within populations. This diversity simultaneously makes the bees one of the most complex and most rewarding of taxa with which to explore questions of social evolution. SOCIAL DIVERSITY How Common is Sociality in Bees? In his nearly forgotten paper, “The application of Darwin’s theory to the flowers and flower-visiting insects,” Müller (1872) laid out the arguments that bees are essentially vegetarian digger wasps, most of which are solitary ground-nesters, with some species showing tolerance for social interactions and nest cohabitation (reviewed in Wcislo & Tierney, 2009). The majority of bee species are solitary, or live in communal social groups consisting of adult females that independently engage in nest construction, defense, and offspring care, but without reproductive division of labor (O’Neil, 2001; Wcislo & Tierney, 2009). In a much more limited number of taxa, family groups (i.e. a mother and her female offspring) have evolved into eusocial societies, in which morphologically or functionally sterile female offspring remain at the nest to help their parent queen rear offspring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationComparative Social Evolution
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages50-83
Number of pages34
ISBN (Electronic)9781107338319
ISBN (Print)9781107043398
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Bees
Apoidea
nests
Social Class
flowers
Wasps
polyethism
Honey
vegetarian diet
Locomotion
Phylogeny
Interpersonal Relations
social structure
queen insects
Apis mellifera
honey bees
locomotion
Insects
flight
Mothers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Wcislo, W., & Fewell, J. (2017). Sociality in bees. In Comparative Social Evolution (pp. 50-83). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107338319.004

Sociality in bees. / Wcislo, William; Fewell, Jennifer.

Comparative Social Evolution. Cambridge University Press, 2017. p. 50-83.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Wcislo, W & Fewell, J 2017, Sociality in bees. in Comparative Social Evolution. Cambridge University Press, pp. 50-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107338319.004
Wcislo W, Fewell J. Sociality in bees. In Comparative Social Evolution. Cambridge University Press. 2017. p. 50-83 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107338319.004
Wcislo, William ; Fewell, Jennifer. / Sociality in bees. Comparative Social Evolution. Cambridge University Press, 2017. pp. 50-83
@inbook{859297516df34f2f966921cb85690c82,
title = "Sociality in bees",
abstract = "The most common image that comes to mind with the term “bee” is the honey bee, Apis mellifera, with its highly derived and well-studied eusocial organization. The diversity of social organization among bees and near relatives (Apoidea), however, is much richer and extensive. The “bees” (Anthophila, within the superfamily Apoidea) include approximately 20,000 species forming a monophyletic clade with a likely single ancestral origin (Danforth, et al., 2006). Ecologically, all bees rely on floral resources to survive, and share a relatively common body plan, related to their reliance on flight as their primary form of locomotion. These commonalities belie their incredible social diversity. The basal (plesiomorphic) and most common life history form in this taxon is actually solitary living. Across the bee phylogeny, however, there are multiple and diverse taxa in which adult females form social alliances without reproductive castes (primarily communal sociality), and diverse taxa have independently evolved reproductive caste-based eusocial societies. Beyond these general categories, bee species vary considerably in how they form social groups and in the specific behaviors they perform cooperatively. Sociality has appeared and been lost multiple times in different lineages, and the expression of sociality can vary within a single species or even within populations. This diversity simultaneously makes the bees one of the most complex and most rewarding of taxa with which to explore questions of social evolution. SOCIAL DIVERSITY How Common is Sociality in Bees? In his nearly forgotten paper, “The application of Darwin’s theory to the flowers and flower-visiting insects,” M{\"u}ller (1872) laid out the arguments that bees are essentially vegetarian digger wasps, most of which are solitary ground-nesters, with some species showing tolerance for social interactions and nest cohabitation (reviewed in Wcislo & Tierney, 2009). The majority of bee species are solitary, or live in communal social groups consisting of adult females that independently engage in nest construction, defense, and offspring care, but without reproductive division of labor (O’Neil, 2001; Wcislo & Tierney, 2009). In a much more limited number of taxa, family groups (i.e. a mother and her female offspring) have evolved into eusocial societies, in which morphologically or functionally sterile female offspring remain at the nest to help their parent queen rear offspring.",
author = "William Wcislo and Jennifer Fewell",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/9781107338319.004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107043398",
pages = "50--83",
booktitle = "Comparative Social Evolution",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sociality in bees

AU - Wcislo, William

AU - Fewell, Jennifer

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The most common image that comes to mind with the term “bee” is the honey bee, Apis mellifera, with its highly derived and well-studied eusocial organization. The diversity of social organization among bees and near relatives (Apoidea), however, is much richer and extensive. The “bees” (Anthophila, within the superfamily Apoidea) include approximately 20,000 species forming a monophyletic clade with a likely single ancestral origin (Danforth, et al., 2006). Ecologically, all bees rely on floral resources to survive, and share a relatively common body plan, related to their reliance on flight as their primary form of locomotion. These commonalities belie their incredible social diversity. The basal (plesiomorphic) and most common life history form in this taxon is actually solitary living. Across the bee phylogeny, however, there are multiple and diverse taxa in which adult females form social alliances without reproductive castes (primarily communal sociality), and diverse taxa have independently evolved reproductive caste-based eusocial societies. Beyond these general categories, bee species vary considerably in how they form social groups and in the specific behaviors they perform cooperatively. Sociality has appeared and been lost multiple times in different lineages, and the expression of sociality can vary within a single species or even within populations. This diversity simultaneously makes the bees one of the most complex and most rewarding of taxa with which to explore questions of social evolution. SOCIAL DIVERSITY How Common is Sociality in Bees? In his nearly forgotten paper, “The application of Darwin’s theory to the flowers and flower-visiting insects,” Müller (1872) laid out the arguments that bees are essentially vegetarian digger wasps, most of which are solitary ground-nesters, with some species showing tolerance for social interactions and nest cohabitation (reviewed in Wcislo & Tierney, 2009). The majority of bee species are solitary, or live in communal social groups consisting of adult females that independently engage in nest construction, defense, and offspring care, but without reproductive division of labor (O’Neil, 2001; Wcislo & Tierney, 2009). In a much more limited number of taxa, family groups (i.e. a mother and her female offspring) have evolved into eusocial societies, in which morphologically or functionally sterile female offspring remain at the nest to help their parent queen rear offspring.

AB - The most common image that comes to mind with the term “bee” is the honey bee, Apis mellifera, with its highly derived and well-studied eusocial organization. The diversity of social organization among bees and near relatives (Apoidea), however, is much richer and extensive. The “bees” (Anthophila, within the superfamily Apoidea) include approximately 20,000 species forming a monophyletic clade with a likely single ancestral origin (Danforth, et al., 2006). Ecologically, all bees rely on floral resources to survive, and share a relatively common body plan, related to their reliance on flight as their primary form of locomotion. These commonalities belie their incredible social diversity. The basal (plesiomorphic) and most common life history form in this taxon is actually solitary living. Across the bee phylogeny, however, there are multiple and diverse taxa in which adult females form social alliances without reproductive castes (primarily communal sociality), and diverse taxa have independently evolved reproductive caste-based eusocial societies. Beyond these general categories, bee species vary considerably in how they form social groups and in the specific behaviors they perform cooperatively. Sociality has appeared and been lost multiple times in different lineages, and the expression of sociality can vary within a single species or even within populations. This diversity simultaneously makes the bees one of the most complex and most rewarding of taxa with which to explore questions of social evolution. SOCIAL DIVERSITY How Common is Sociality in Bees? In his nearly forgotten paper, “The application of Darwin’s theory to the flowers and flower-visiting insects,” Müller (1872) laid out the arguments that bees are essentially vegetarian digger wasps, most of which are solitary ground-nesters, with some species showing tolerance for social interactions and nest cohabitation (reviewed in Wcislo & Tierney, 2009). The majority of bee species are solitary, or live in communal social groups consisting of adult females that independently engage in nest construction, defense, and offspring care, but without reproductive division of labor (O’Neil, 2001; Wcislo & Tierney, 2009). In a much more limited number of taxa, family groups (i.e. a mother and her female offspring) have evolved into eusocial societies, in which morphologically or functionally sterile female offspring remain at the nest to help their parent queen rear offspring.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041456518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041456518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/9781107338319.004

DO - 10.1017/9781107338319.004

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781107043398

SP - 50

EP - 83

BT - Comparative Social Evolution

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -