TY - JOUR
T1 - Social support under siege
T2 - An analysis of forced migration among women from the Democratic Republic of Congo
AU - Wachter, Karin
AU - Gulbas, Lauren E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported by dissertation research fellowships provided to the first author from the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health - Harry E. and Bernice M. Moore Fellowship for Doctoral Research - and the Institute on Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault , both located at The University of Texas at Austin.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - In 2016, researchers conducted a qualitative study in a mid-sized town in the United States to address gaps in research and practice related to psychosocial consequences of forced migration among women. The loss of social support and its impacts on the well-being of women are rarely addressed in refugee resettlement policy or practice overwhelmingly concerned with economic self-sufficiency. The study sought to develop theory to explain how women (n = 27) who migrated from the Democratic Republic of the Congo recreate social support post-resettlement in the United States. An interpretive approach informed by postcolonial feminist perspectives guided the grounded theory methodology. A theoretical model emerged explaining pivots in the internal and relational lives of women as social support systematically constricted over time as a result of war, displacement, and resettlement. Upon arrival to the United States, women experienced partitioned lives through changing relationships to space and time, which contributed to women being alone and impacted well-being. Converging processes propelled women towards learning to stand alone, through which women could develop a sense self-reliance, but not without internal and relational consequences. The analysis contributes to the empirical literature knowledge of how resettlement is a life altering event that sets into motion psychosocial processes with implications for well-being and health. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
AB - In 2016, researchers conducted a qualitative study in a mid-sized town in the United States to address gaps in research and practice related to psychosocial consequences of forced migration among women. The loss of social support and its impacts on the well-being of women are rarely addressed in refugee resettlement policy or practice overwhelmingly concerned with economic self-sufficiency. The study sought to develop theory to explain how women (n = 27) who migrated from the Democratic Republic of the Congo recreate social support post-resettlement in the United States. An interpretive approach informed by postcolonial feminist perspectives guided the grounded theory methodology. A theoretical model emerged explaining pivots in the internal and relational lives of women as social support systematically constricted over time as a result of war, displacement, and resettlement. Upon arrival to the United States, women experienced partitioned lives through changing relationships to space and time, which contributed to women being alone and impacted well-being. Converging processes propelled women towards learning to stand alone, through which women could develop a sense self-reliance, but not without internal and relational consequences. The analysis contributes to the empirical literature knowledge of how resettlement is a life altering event that sets into motion psychosocial processes with implications for well-being and health. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
KW - Democratic Republic of Congo
KW - Feminist postcolonialism
KW - Grounded theory
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Refugees
KW - Resettlement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047016132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047016132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.056
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.056
M3 - Article
C2 - 29778969
AN - SCOPUS:85047016132
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 208
SP - 107
EP - 116
JO - Ethics in Science and Medicine
JF - Ethics in Science and Medicine
ER -