Social signals and sustainability: ambiguity about motivations can affect status perceptions of efficiency and curtailment behaviors

Matheus de Nardo, Jeremy S. Brooks, Sonja Klinsky, Charlie Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Perceived status can affect the diffusion of pro-environmental behaviors and sustainable consumption. However, the status of different forms of sustainable consumption has not been adequately explored. Previous studies suggest that curtailment behaviors are associated with low or neutral status, while efficiency behaviors are associated with high status. However, these studies have generally examined a small number of behaviors. Drawing from costly signaling theory, we developed a mixed methods study to explore whether and why pro-environmental behaviors are perceived to be associated with high or low status, the perceived motivation for those behaviors, and the relationship between motivation and status. We conducted structured, interactive interviews with 71 participants to explore perceptions of 19 behaviors. Using quantitative and qualitative analyses, we find that efficiency is rated higher status than curtailment largely due to monetary considerations. Efficiency is also perceived to be motivated by environmental concern to a greater degree than curtailment. Understanding the motivation for behaviors clarifies the social signal because it provides insights into whether one is incurring personal costs. Importantly, it is often unclear whether low-cost curtailment behaviors are adopted by choice rather than financial need. Ambiguity about the intentionality of behaviors results in such behaviors being perceived as lower status. Those who argue that curtailment will be necessary for long-term sustainability must address status perceptions because social stigmas could hinder their adoption. Overcoming such stigmas may require, indicating that curtailment behaviors are voluntary, but it may be more effective to use social or economic mechanisms to increase efficiency behaviors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironment Systems and Decisions
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 21 2017

Fingerprint

sustainability
cost
economics

Keywords

  • Diffusion
  • Environmental motivation
  • Overconsumption
  • Pro-environmental behavior
  • Prosocial behavior
  • Sustainable consumption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Social signals and sustainability : ambiguity about motivations can affect status perceptions of efficiency and curtailment behaviors. / de Nardo, Matheus; Brooks, Jeremy S.; Klinsky, Sonja; Wilson, Charlie.

In: Environment Systems and Decisions, 21.01.2017, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4609dbb22f834de4ad3df37bd7a086ef,
title = "Social signals and sustainability: ambiguity about motivations can affect status perceptions of efficiency and curtailment behaviors",
abstract = "Perceived status can affect the diffusion of pro-environmental behaviors and sustainable consumption. However, the status of different forms of sustainable consumption has not been adequately explored. Previous studies suggest that curtailment behaviors are associated with low or neutral status, while efficiency behaviors are associated with high status. However, these studies have generally examined a small number of behaviors. Drawing from costly signaling theory, we developed a mixed methods study to explore whether and why pro-environmental behaviors are perceived to be associated with high or low status, the perceived motivation for those behaviors, and the relationship between motivation and status. We conducted structured, interactive interviews with 71 participants to explore perceptions of 19 behaviors. Using quantitative and qualitative analyses, we find that efficiency is rated higher status than curtailment largely due to monetary considerations. Efficiency is also perceived to be motivated by environmental concern to a greater degree than curtailment. Understanding the motivation for behaviors clarifies the social signal because it provides insights into whether one is incurring personal costs. Importantly, it is often unclear whether low-cost curtailment behaviors are adopted by choice rather than financial need. Ambiguity about the intentionality of behaviors results in such behaviors being perceived as lower status. Those who argue that curtailment will be necessary for long-term sustainability must address status perceptions because social stigmas could hinder their adoption. Overcoming such stigmas may require, indicating that curtailment behaviors are voluntary, but it may be more effective to use social or economic mechanisms to increase efficiency behaviors.",
keywords = "Diffusion, Environmental motivation, Overconsumption, Pro-environmental behavior, Prosocial behavior, Sustainable consumption",
author = "{de Nardo}, Matheus and Brooks, {Jeremy S.} and Sonja Klinsky and Charlie Wilson",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s10669-017-9624-y",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Environment Systems and Decisions",
issn = "2194-5403",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social signals and sustainability

T2 - ambiguity about motivations can affect status perceptions of efficiency and curtailment behaviors

AU - de Nardo, Matheus

AU - Brooks, Jeremy S.

AU - Klinsky, Sonja

AU - Wilson, Charlie

PY - 2017/1/21

Y1 - 2017/1/21

N2 - Perceived status can affect the diffusion of pro-environmental behaviors and sustainable consumption. However, the status of different forms of sustainable consumption has not been adequately explored. Previous studies suggest that curtailment behaviors are associated with low or neutral status, while efficiency behaviors are associated with high status. However, these studies have generally examined a small number of behaviors. Drawing from costly signaling theory, we developed a mixed methods study to explore whether and why pro-environmental behaviors are perceived to be associated with high or low status, the perceived motivation for those behaviors, and the relationship between motivation and status. We conducted structured, interactive interviews with 71 participants to explore perceptions of 19 behaviors. Using quantitative and qualitative analyses, we find that efficiency is rated higher status than curtailment largely due to monetary considerations. Efficiency is also perceived to be motivated by environmental concern to a greater degree than curtailment. Understanding the motivation for behaviors clarifies the social signal because it provides insights into whether one is incurring personal costs. Importantly, it is often unclear whether low-cost curtailment behaviors are adopted by choice rather than financial need. Ambiguity about the intentionality of behaviors results in such behaviors being perceived as lower status. Those who argue that curtailment will be necessary for long-term sustainability must address status perceptions because social stigmas could hinder their adoption. Overcoming such stigmas may require, indicating that curtailment behaviors are voluntary, but it may be more effective to use social or economic mechanisms to increase efficiency behaviors.

AB - Perceived status can affect the diffusion of pro-environmental behaviors and sustainable consumption. However, the status of different forms of sustainable consumption has not been adequately explored. Previous studies suggest that curtailment behaviors are associated with low or neutral status, while efficiency behaviors are associated with high status. However, these studies have generally examined a small number of behaviors. Drawing from costly signaling theory, we developed a mixed methods study to explore whether and why pro-environmental behaviors are perceived to be associated with high or low status, the perceived motivation for those behaviors, and the relationship between motivation and status. We conducted structured, interactive interviews with 71 participants to explore perceptions of 19 behaviors. Using quantitative and qualitative analyses, we find that efficiency is rated higher status than curtailment largely due to monetary considerations. Efficiency is also perceived to be motivated by environmental concern to a greater degree than curtailment. Understanding the motivation for behaviors clarifies the social signal because it provides insights into whether one is incurring personal costs. Importantly, it is often unclear whether low-cost curtailment behaviors are adopted by choice rather than financial need. Ambiguity about the intentionality of behaviors results in such behaviors being perceived as lower status. Those who argue that curtailment will be necessary for long-term sustainability must address status perceptions because social stigmas could hinder their adoption. Overcoming such stigmas may require, indicating that curtailment behaviors are voluntary, but it may be more effective to use social or economic mechanisms to increase efficiency behaviors.

KW - Diffusion

KW - Environmental motivation

KW - Overconsumption

KW - Pro-environmental behavior

KW - Prosocial behavior

KW - Sustainable consumption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009836763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009836763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10669-017-9624-y

DO - 10.1007/s10669-017-9624-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009836763

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Environment Systems and Decisions

JF - Environment Systems and Decisions

SN - 2194-5403

ER -