Social network analysis of a scientist-practitioner research initiative established to facilitate science dissemination and implementation within states and communities

Elizabeth M. Ginexi, Grace Huang, Michael Steketee, Sophia Tsakraklides, Keith Macallum, Julie Bromberg, Amanda Huffman, Douglas A. Luke, Scott Leischow, Janet M. Okamoto, Todd Rogers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents a case study of a scientist-practitioner research network established by the National Cancer Institute's State and Community Tobacco Control Research Initiative. While prior programs have focused on collaboration among scientists, a goal here was to encourage collaborations with non-university, practice-based partners. Two stages of analyses examine growth in the network and collaboration outcomes over a 2-year timeframe. First, visual and descriptive analyses were used to assess the network's structure and characteristics. Second, regression modeling was used to assess the relationship between investigator characteristics on active collaboration with non-university partners in research and coauthorship. Network analysis revealed an increasing number of connections, low and decreasing density, increasing centralization and select individuals with high degree and betweenness centralities. Investigator seniority and experience did not predict the active partner connections. Rather, scientists' betweenness centrality, or the extent to which they acted as bridges across the network, was the key predictor of collaboration. This finding suggests a novel way for dissemination-focused research programs to identify super-connector investigators to foster practitioner linkages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-325
Number of pages10
JournalResearch Evaluation
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

network analysis
social network
science
community
centralization
nicotine
cancer
regression
experience

Keywords

  • dissemination and implementation
  • public health
  • science-to-practice
  • social network analysis
  • tobacco control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Social network analysis of a scientist-practitioner research initiative established to facilitate science dissemination and implementation within states and communities. / Ginexi, Elizabeth M.; Huang, Grace; Steketee, Michael; Tsakraklides, Sophia; Macallum, Keith; Bromberg, Julie; Huffman, Amanda; Luke, Douglas A.; Leischow, Scott; Okamoto, Janet M.; Rogers, Todd.

In: Research Evaluation, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.10.2017, p. 316-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ginexi, EM, Huang, G, Steketee, M, Tsakraklides, S, Macallum, K, Bromberg, J, Huffman, A, Luke, DA, Leischow, S, Okamoto, JM & Rogers, T 2017, 'Social network analysis of a scientist-practitioner research initiative established to facilitate science dissemination and implementation within states and communities', Research Evaluation, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 316-325. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx026
Ginexi, Elizabeth M. ; Huang, Grace ; Steketee, Michael ; Tsakraklides, Sophia ; Macallum, Keith ; Bromberg, Julie ; Huffman, Amanda ; Luke, Douglas A. ; Leischow, Scott ; Okamoto, Janet M. ; Rogers, Todd. / Social network analysis of a scientist-practitioner research initiative established to facilitate science dissemination and implementation within states and communities. In: Research Evaluation. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 316-325.
@article{752c8a610c4648799a5b36ce4eff7a00,
title = "Social network analysis of a scientist-practitioner research initiative established to facilitate science dissemination and implementation within states and communities",
abstract = "This article presents a case study of a scientist-practitioner research network established by the National Cancer Institute's State and Community Tobacco Control Research Initiative. While prior programs have focused on collaboration among scientists, a goal here was to encourage collaborations with non-university, practice-based partners. Two stages of analyses examine growth in the network and collaboration outcomes over a 2-year timeframe. First, visual and descriptive analyses were used to assess the network's structure and characteristics. Second, regression modeling was used to assess the relationship between investigator characteristics on active collaboration with non-university partners in research and coauthorship. Network analysis revealed an increasing number of connections, low and decreasing density, increasing centralization and select individuals with high degree and betweenness centralities. Investigator seniority and experience did not predict the active partner connections. Rather, scientists' betweenness centrality, or the extent to which they acted as bridges across the network, was the key predictor of collaboration. This finding suggests a novel way for dissemination-focused research programs to identify super-connector investigators to foster practitioner linkages.",
keywords = "dissemination and implementation, public health, science-to-practice, social network analysis, tobacco control",
author = "Ginexi, {Elizabeth M.} and Grace Huang and Michael Steketee and Sophia Tsakraklides and Keith Macallum and Julie Bromberg and Amanda Huffman and Luke, {Douglas A.} and Scott Leischow and Okamoto, {Janet M.} and Todd Rogers",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/reseval/rvx026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "316--325",
journal = "Research Evaluation",
issn = "0958-2029",
publisher = "Beech Tree Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social network analysis of a scientist-practitioner research initiative established to facilitate science dissemination and implementation within states and communities

AU - Ginexi, Elizabeth M.

AU - Huang, Grace

AU - Steketee, Michael

AU - Tsakraklides, Sophia

AU - Macallum, Keith

AU - Bromberg, Julie

AU - Huffman, Amanda

AU - Luke, Douglas A.

AU - Leischow, Scott

AU - Okamoto, Janet M.

AU - Rogers, Todd

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - This article presents a case study of a scientist-practitioner research network established by the National Cancer Institute's State and Community Tobacco Control Research Initiative. While prior programs have focused on collaboration among scientists, a goal here was to encourage collaborations with non-university, practice-based partners. Two stages of analyses examine growth in the network and collaboration outcomes over a 2-year timeframe. First, visual and descriptive analyses were used to assess the network's structure and characteristics. Second, regression modeling was used to assess the relationship between investigator characteristics on active collaboration with non-university partners in research and coauthorship. Network analysis revealed an increasing number of connections, low and decreasing density, increasing centralization and select individuals with high degree and betweenness centralities. Investigator seniority and experience did not predict the active partner connections. Rather, scientists' betweenness centrality, or the extent to which they acted as bridges across the network, was the key predictor of collaboration. This finding suggests a novel way for dissemination-focused research programs to identify super-connector investigators to foster practitioner linkages.

AB - This article presents a case study of a scientist-practitioner research network established by the National Cancer Institute's State and Community Tobacco Control Research Initiative. While prior programs have focused on collaboration among scientists, a goal here was to encourage collaborations with non-university, practice-based partners. Two stages of analyses examine growth in the network and collaboration outcomes over a 2-year timeframe. First, visual and descriptive analyses were used to assess the network's structure and characteristics. Second, regression modeling was used to assess the relationship between investigator characteristics on active collaboration with non-university partners in research and coauthorship. Network analysis revealed an increasing number of connections, low and decreasing density, increasing centralization and select individuals with high degree and betweenness centralities. Investigator seniority and experience did not predict the active partner connections. Rather, scientists' betweenness centrality, or the extent to which they acted as bridges across the network, was the key predictor of collaboration. This finding suggests a novel way for dissemination-focused research programs to identify super-connector investigators to foster practitioner linkages.

KW - dissemination and implementation

KW - public health

KW - science-to-practice

KW - social network analysis

KW - tobacco control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032725975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032725975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvx026

DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvx026

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032725975

VL - 26

SP - 316

EP - 325

JO - Research Evaluation

JF - Research Evaluation

SN - 0958-2029

IS - 4

ER -