Social dynamics of research collaboration

Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining coauthorship rights (rip)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

As co-authorship has become common practice in most science and engineering disciplines and, with the growth of co-authoring has come a fragmentation of norms and practices, some of them discipline-based, some institution-based. It becomes increasingly important to understand the practices, in part to reduce the likelihood of misunderstanding in collaborations among authors from different disciplines and fields. Moreover, there is also evidence of widespread satisfaction with collaborative and co-authoring experience. In some cases the dissatisfactions are more in the realm of bruised feelings and miscommunication but in others there is clear exploitation and even legal disputes about, for example, intellectual property. Our paper is part of a multiyear study funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation and draws its data from a representative national survey of academic scientists working in Carnegie Extensive ("Research I") universities (n=641). The paper tests hypotheses about the determinants of collaboration effectiveness.x

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference
Pages1613-1621
Number of pages9
Volume2
StatePublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes
Event14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, ISSI 2013 - Vienna, Austria
Duration: Jul 15 2013Jul 20 2013

Other

Other14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, ISSI 2013
CountryAustria
CityVienna
Period7/15/137/20/13

Fingerprint

Social Dynamics
Authoring
Intellectual property
Norm
Intellectual Property
Hypothesis Test
Fragmentation
Exploitation
Likelihood
Determinant
Engineering
Ethics
Collaboration
Research collaboration
Social dynamics
Ethical issues
Co-authorship
Evidence
Universities
Experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Bozeman, B., Gaughan, M., & Youtie, J. (2013). Social dynamics of research collaboration: Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining coauthorship rights (rip). In Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 1613-1621)

Social dynamics of research collaboration : Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining coauthorship rights (rip). / Bozeman, Barry; Gaughan, Monica; Youtie, Jan.

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference. Vol. 2 2013. p. 1613-1621.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bozeman, B, Gaughan, M & Youtie, J 2013, Social dynamics of research collaboration: Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining coauthorship rights (rip). in Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference. vol. 2, pp. 1613-1621, 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, ISSI 2013, Vienna, Austria, 7/15/13.
Bozeman B, Gaughan M, Youtie J. Social dynamics of research collaboration: Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining coauthorship rights (rip). In Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference. Vol. 2. 2013. p. 1613-1621
Bozeman, Barry ; Gaughan, Monica ; Youtie, Jan. / Social dynamics of research collaboration : Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining coauthorship rights (rip). Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference. Vol. 2 2013. pp. 1613-1621
@inproceedings{1f83723f777543b5972a994ed75800ed,
title = "Social dynamics of research collaboration: Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining coauthorship rights (rip)",
abstract = "As co-authorship has become common practice in most science and engineering disciplines and, with the growth of co-authoring has come a fragmentation of norms and practices, some of them discipline-based, some institution-based. It becomes increasingly important to understand the practices, in part to reduce the likelihood of misunderstanding in collaborations among authors from different disciplines and fields. Moreover, there is also evidence of widespread satisfaction with collaborative and co-authoring experience. In some cases the dissatisfactions are more in the realm of bruised feelings and miscommunication but in others there is clear exploitation and even legal disputes about, for example, intellectual property. Our paper is part of a multiyear study funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation and draws its data from a representative national survey of academic scientists working in Carnegie Extensive ({"}Research I{"}) universities (n=641). The paper tests hypotheses about the determinants of collaboration effectiveness.x",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Monica Gaughan and Jan Youtie",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783200031357",
volume = "2",
pages = "1613--1621",
booktitle = "Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Social dynamics of research collaboration

T2 - Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining coauthorship rights (rip)

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Gaughan, Monica

AU - Youtie, Jan

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - As co-authorship has become common practice in most science and engineering disciplines and, with the growth of co-authoring has come a fragmentation of norms and practices, some of them discipline-based, some institution-based. It becomes increasingly important to understand the practices, in part to reduce the likelihood of misunderstanding in collaborations among authors from different disciplines and fields. Moreover, there is also evidence of widespread satisfaction with collaborative and co-authoring experience. In some cases the dissatisfactions are more in the realm of bruised feelings and miscommunication but in others there is clear exploitation and even legal disputes about, for example, intellectual property. Our paper is part of a multiyear study funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation and draws its data from a representative national survey of academic scientists working in Carnegie Extensive ("Research I") universities (n=641). The paper tests hypotheses about the determinants of collaboration effectiveness.x

AB - As co-authorship has become common practice in most science and engineering disciplines and, with the growth of co-authoring has come a fragmentation of norms and practices, some of them discipline-based, some institution-based. It becomes increasingly important to understand the practices, in part to reduce the likelihood of misunderstanding in collaborations among authors from different disciplines and fields. Moreover, there is also evidence of widespread satisfaction with collaborative and co-authoring experience. In some cases the dissatisfactions are more in the realm of bruised feelings and miscommunication but in others there is clear exploitation and even legal disputes about, for example, intellectual property. Our paper is part of a multiyear study funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation and draws its data from a representative national survey of academic scientists working in Carnegie Extensive ("Research I") universities (n=641). The paper tests hypotheses about the determinants of collaboration effectiveness.x

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896805007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896805007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783200031357

VL - 2

SP - 1613

EP - 1621

BT - Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

ER -