Social dynamics drive selection in cooperative associations of ant queens

Rebecca M. Clark, Jennifer Fewell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social dynamics, the emergent effects of interactions within structured groups, play a key role in shaping social phenotypes and fitness. We examined the potential positive and negative effects of social dynamics in simple groups, by creating social groups of harvester ant queens with 2 alternate nest-founding strategies, solitary versus cooperative. We compared social interactions, survival, and nest productivity of pairs containing queens from the cooperative founding population, the normally solitary founding population, or mixed pairs of the 2 types. Expressed social phenotypes of queens in pairs depended strongly on the lineage of the other queen. Two behaviors, aggression and brood care, showed simple social dynamical effects. Aggression escalated in pairs of normally solitary queens, whereas queens in cooperative pairs coordinated brood output, leading to more efficient worker production. These dynamics had context-based fitness consequences, such that cooperative queens gained a survival advantage in cooperative pairs, but neither type of queen experienced an advantage or disadvantage in "mixed" associations. The interplay between social dynamics and fitness in these associations provides an empirical example of social selection. It captures a likely scenario of the transition to and the early evolution of cooperative living, in which cooperative individuals interact with solitary individuals who lack a priori strategies for cooperation or cheating.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-123
Number of pages7
JournalBehavioral Ecology
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

queen insects
cooperatives
ant
fitness
aggression
phenotype
nest
nests
brood rearing
social dynamics
productivity
effect

Keywords

  • Ant foundress associations
  • Cooperation
  • Interacting phenotypes
  • Pleometrosis
  • Social dynamics
  • Social phenotype
  • Social selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Social dynamics drive selection in cooperative associations of ant queens. / Clark, Rebecca M.; Fewell, Jennifer.

In: Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 25, No. 1, 07.2014, p. 117-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0019c76b92a340599929fc7c64971cb9,
title = "Social dynamics drive selection in cooperative associations of ant queens",
abstract = "Social dynamics, the emergent effects of interactions within structured groups, play a key role in shaping social phenotypes and fitness. We examined the potential positive and negative effects of social dynamics in simple groups, by creating social groups of harvester ant queens with 2 alternate nest-founding strategies, solitary versus cooperative. We compared social interactions, survival, and nest productivity of pairs containing queens from the cooperative founding population, the normally solitary founding population, or mixed pairs of the 2 types. Expressed social phenotypes of queens in pairs depended strongly on the lineage of the other queen. Two behaviors, aggression and brood care, showed simple social dynamical effects. Aggression escalated in pairs of normally solitary queens, whereas queens in cooperative pairs coordinated brood output, leading to more efficient worker production. These dynamics had context-based fitness consequences, such that cooperative queens gained a survival advantage in cooperative pairs, but neither type of queen experienced an advantage or disadvantage in {"}mixed{"} associations. The interplay between social dynamics and fitness in these associations provides an empirical example of social selection. It captures a likely scenario of the transition to and the early evolution of cooperative living, in which cooperative individuals interact with solitary individuals who lack a priori strategies for cooperation or cheating.",
keywords = "Ant foundress associations, Cooperation, Interacting phenotypes, Pleometrosis, Social dynamics, Social phenotype, Social selection",
author = "Clark, {Rebecca M.} and Jennifer Fewell",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1093/beheco/art093",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "117--123",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology",
issn = "1045-2249",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social dynamics drive selection in cooperative associations of ant queens

AU - Clark, Rebecca M.

AU - Fewell, Jennifer

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Social dynamics, the emergent effects of interactions within structured groups, play a key role in shaping social phenotypes and fitness. We examined the potential positive and negative effects of social dynamics in simple groups, by creating social groups of harvester ant queens with 2 alternate nest-founding strategies, solitary versus cooperative. We compared social interactions, survival, and nest productivity of pairs containing queens from the cooperative founding population, the normally solitary founding population, or mixed pairs of the 2 types. Expressed social phenotypes of queens in pairs depended strongly on the lineage of the other queen. Two behaviors, aggression and brood care, showed simple social dynamical effects. Aggression escalated in pairs of normally solitary queens, whereas queens in cooperative pairs coordinated brood output, leading to more efficient worker production. These dynamics had context-based fitness consequences, such that cooperative queens gained a survival advantage in cooperative pairs, but neither type of queen experienced an advantage or disadvantage in "mixed" associations. The interplay between social dynamics and fitness in these associations provides an empirical example of social selection. It captures a likely scenario of the transition to and the early evolution of cooperative living, in which cooperative individuals interact with solitary individuals who lack a priori strategies for cooperation or cheating.

AB - Social dynamics, the emergent effects of interactions within structured groups, play a key role in shaping social phenotypes and fitness. We examined the potential positive and negative effects of social dynamics in simple groups, by creating social groups of harvester ant queens with 2 alternate nest-founding strategies, solitary versus cooperative. We compared social interactions, survival, and nest productivity of pairs containing queens from the cooperative founding population, the normally solitary founding population, or mixed pairs of the 2 types. Expressed social phenotypes of queens in pairs depended strongly on the lineage of the other queen. Two behaviors, aggression and brood care, showed simple social dynamical effects. Aggression escalated in pairs of normally solitary queens, whereas queens in cooperative pairs coordinated brood output, leading to more efficient worker production. These dynamics had context-based fitness consequences, such that cooperative queens gained a survival advantage in cooperative pairs, but neither type of queen experienced an advantage or disadvantage in "mixed" associations. The interplay between social dynamics and fitness in these associations provides an empirical example of social selection. It captures a likely scenario of the transition to and the early evolution of cooperative living, in which cooperative individuals interact with solitary individuals who lack a priori strategies for cooperation or cheating.

KW - Ant foundress associations

KW - Cooperation

KW - Interacting phenotypes

KW - Pleometrosis

KW - Social dynamics

KW - Social phenotype

KW - Social selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890711387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890711387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/beheco/art093

DO - 10.1093/beheco/art093

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 117

EP - 123

JO - Behavioral Ecology

JF - Behavioral Ecology

SN - 1045-2249

IS - 1

ER -