Social Comparison and Persuasive Arguments as Determinants of Group Polarization

Paul Mongeau, Rick Garlick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a study of group polarization, Bosier and Mayer (1984) found that social comparison information influenced perception of persuasive argument information. In their investigation, however, position of majority was confounded with other of presentation. The present study attempted to replicate Boster and Mayer while varying order of presentation. Results of the present investigation, first, support the persuasive arguments explanation of group polarization. Second, results are inconsistent with an order effect. Finally, results indicate a parallel between the group polarization literature and the cognitive response literature in persuasion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-125
Number of pages6
JournalCommunication Research Reports
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

polarization
Polarization
determinants
Group
persuasion
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Social Comparison and Persuasive Arguments as Determinants of Group Polarization. / Mongeau, Paul; Garlick, Rick.

In: Communication Research Reports, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1988, p. 120-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f3bad2c1df6a42ba85cc923f9b9f676a,
title = "Social Comparison and Persuasive Arguments as Determinants of Group Polarization",
abstract = "In a study of group polarization, Bosier and Mayer (1984) found that social comparison information influenced perception of persuasive argument information. In their investigation, however, position of majority was confounded with other of presentation. The present study attempted to replicate Boster and Mayer while varying order of presentation. Results of the present investigation, first, support the persuasive arguments explanation of group polarization. Second, results are inconsistent with an order effect. Finally, results indicate a parallel between the group polarization literature and the cognitive response literature in persuasion.",
author = "Paul Mongeau and Rick Garlick",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1080/08824098809359812",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "120--125",
journal = "Communication Research Reports",
issn = "0882-4096",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Comparison and Persuasive Arguments as Determinants of Group Polarization

AU - Mongeau, Paul

AU - Garlick, Rick

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - In a study of group polarization, Bosier and Mayer (1984) found that social comparison information influenced perception of persuasive argument information. In their investigation, however, position of majority was confounded with other of presentation. The present study attempted to replicate Boster and Mayer while varying order of presentation. Results of the present investigation, first, support the persuasive arguments explanation of group polarization. Second, results are inconsistent with an order effect. Finally, results indicate a parallel between the group polarization literature and the cognitive response literature in persuasion.

AB - In a study of group polarization, Bosier and Mayer (1984) found that social comparison information influenced perception of persuasive argument information. In their investigation, however, position of majority was confounded with other of presentation. The present study attempted to replicate Boster and Mayer while varying order of presentation. Results of the present investigation, first, support the persuasive arguments explanation of group polarization. Second, results are inconsistent with an order effect. Finally, results indicate a parallel between the group polarization literature and the cognitive response literature in persuasion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946654813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946654813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08824098809359812

DO - 10.1080/08824098809359812

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84946654813

VL - 5

SP - 120

EP - 125

JO - Communication Research Reports

JF - Communication Research Reports

SN - 0882-4096

IS - 2

ER -