@article{3c00d1fc01d44d9c9e7fe9ab3df0f190,
title = "Small increases in group size improve small shoals' response to water flow in zebrafish",
abstract = "Social context may influence the perception of sensory cues and the ability to display refined behavioral responses. Previous work suggests that effective responses to environmental cues can be contingent on having a sufficient number of individuals in a group. Thus, the changes in group size may have profound impacts, particularly on the behavior of small social groups. Using zebrafish (Danio rerio), here we examined how changes in group size influence the ability to respond to changes in water flow. We found that fish in relatively larger groups displayed stronger rheotaxis even when comparing pairs of fish with groups of four fish, indicating that a small increase in group size can enhance the responsiveness to environmental change. Individual fish in relatively larger groups also spent less time in the energetically costly leading position than individuals in pairs, indicating that even a small increase in group size may provide energetic benefits. We also found that the shoal cohesion was dependent on the size of the group but within a given group size, shoal cohesion did not vary with the flow rate. Our study highlights that even a small change in group size could significantly affect the way social fish respond to the changes in water flow, which could be an important attribute that shapes the resilience of social animals in changing environments.",
keywords = "Danio rerio, energetic costs, group size, rheotaxis, sensory enhancement, shoal cohesion, shoals, zebrafish",
author = "Suriyampola, {P. S.} and Iruri-Tucker, {A. A.} and L. Padilla-Vel{\'e}z and A. Enriquez and Shelton, {D. S.} and Martins, {E. P.}",
note = "Funding Information: We thank Bryan Walters, Aaron Fellows, Sasha Savytsky, and Roger Morris for help in designing and building the fluvial tanks. We also thank Grace Blackwell, Anna Castillo, and Emily Howard for helping with running the experiment and data collection. Cristina Romero‐Diaz provided helpful feedback on early version of this manuscript and Julio Rivera provided statistical assistance. We also thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions helped improve this manuscript. DSS's contribution was supported by a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology (DBI‐1611616) and NIH NIEHS K99 (1K99ES03039801A1). This work was also supported by the National Science Foundation through grant IOS‐1257562 to EPM. Funding Information: We thank Bryan Walters, Aaron Fellows, Sasha Savytsky, and Roger Morris for help in designing and building the fluvial tanks. We also thank Grace Blackwell, Anna Castillo, and Emily Howard for helping with running the experiment and data collection. Cristina Romero-Diaz provided helpful feedback on early version of this manuscript and Julio Rivera provided statistical assistance. We also thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions helped improve this manuscript. DSS's contribution was supported by a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology (DBI-1611616) and NIH NIEHS K99 (1K99ES03039801A1). This work was also supported by the National Science Foundation through grant IOS-1257562 to EPM. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Zoological Society of London.",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1111/jzo.12952",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "316",
pages = "271--281",
journal = "Environment and Development Economics",
issn = "1355-770X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",
}