Skepticism and the acquisition of “knowledge”

Shaun Nichols, Nestor Pinillos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Do you know you are not being massively deceived by an evil demon? That is a familiar skeptical challenge. Less familiar is this question: How do you have a conception of knowledge on which the evil demon constitutes a prima facie challenge? Recently several philosophers have suggested that our responses to skeptical scenarios can be explained in terms of heuristics and biases. We offer an alternative explanation, based in learning theory. We argue that, given the evidence available to the learner, it would be rational for the learner to infer an infallibilist conception of knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-414
Number of pages18
JournalMind and Language
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

learning theory
heuristics
scenario
trend
evidence
Skepticism
Evil
Demons
Conception
Learning Theory
Scenarios
Heuristics and Biases
Philosopher

Keywords

  • epistemology
  • infallibilism
  • Knowledge
  • learning
  • skepticism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Skepticism and the acquisition of “knowledge”. / Nichols, Shaun; Pinillos, Nestor.

In: Mind and Language, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.09.2018, p. 397-414.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nichols, Shaun ; Pinillos, Nestor. / Skepticism and the acquisition of “knowledge”. In: Mind and Language. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 397-414.
@article{0b5ffb4c105e4fc1bee8868276f2bb93,
title = "Skepticism and the acquisition of “knowledge”",
abstract = "Do you know you are not being massively deceived by an evil demon? That is a familiar skeptical challenge. Less familiar is this question: How do you have a conception of knowledge on which the evil demon constitutes a prima facie challenge? Recently several philosophers have suggested that our responses to skeptical scenarios can be explained in terms of heuristics and biases. We offer an alternative explanation, based in learning theory. We argue that, given the evidence available to the learner, it would be rational for the learner to infer an infallibilist conception of knowledge.",
keywords = "epistemology, infallibilism, Knowledge, learning, skepticism",
author = "Shaun Nichols and Nestor Pinillos",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/mila.12179",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "397--414",
journal = "Mind and Language",
issn = "0268-1064",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skepticism and the acquisition of “knowledge”

AU - Nichols, Shaun

AU - Pinillos, Nestor

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Do you know you are not being massively deceived by an evil demon? That is a familiar skeptical challenge. Less familiar is this question: How do you have a conception of knowledge on which the evil demon constitutes a prima facie challenge? Recently several philosophers have suggested that our responses to skeptical scenarios can be explained in terms of heuristics and biases. We offer an alternative explanation, based in learning theory. We argue that, given the evidence available to the learner, it would be rational for the learner to infer an infallibilist conception of knowledge.

AB - Do you know you are not being massively deceived by an evil demon? That is a familiar skeptical challenge. Less familiar is this question: How do you have a conception of knowledge on which the evil demon constitutes a prima facie challenge? Recently several philosophers have suggested that our responses to skeptical scenarios can be explained in terms of heuristics and biases. We offer an alternative explanation, based in learning theory. We argue that, given the evidence available to the learner, it would be rational for the learner to infer an infallibilist conception of knowledge.

KW - epistemology

KW - infallibilism

KW - Knowledge

KW - learning

KW - skepticism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053050496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053050496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/mila.12179

DO - 10.1111/mila.12179

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053050496

VL - 33

SP - 397

EP - 414

JO - Mind and Language

JF - Mind and Language

SN - 0268-1064

IS - 4

ER -