Situating hazard vulnerability

People's negotiations with wildfire environments in the U.S. Southwest

Timothy W. Collins, Robert Bolin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article is based on a multimethod study designed to clarify influences on wildfire hazard vulnerability in Arizona's White Mountains, USA. Findings reveal that multiple factors operating across scales generate socially unequal wildfire risks. At the household scale, conflicting environmental values, reliance on fire insurance and firefighting institutions, a lack of place dependency, and social vulnerability (e.g., a lack of financial, physical, and/or legal capacity to reduce risks) were found to be important influences on wildfire risk. At the regional-scale, the shift from a resource extraction to environmental amenity-based economy has transformed ecological communities, produced unequal social distributions of risks and resources, and shaped people's social and environmental interactions in everyday life. While working-class locals are more socially vulnerable than amenity migrants to wildfire hazards, they have also been more active in attempting to reduce risks in the aftermath of the disastrous 2002 Rodeo-Chediski fire. Social tensions between locals and amenity migrants temporarily dissolved immediately following the disaster, only to be exacerbated by the heightened perception of risk and the differential commitment to hazard mitigation displayed by these groups over a 2-year study period. Findings suggest that to enhance wildfire safety, environmental managers should acknowledge the environmental benefits associated with hazardous landscapes, the incentives created by risk management programs, and the specific constraints to action for relevant social groups in changing human-environmental context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)441-455
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

wildfire
Hazards
vulnerability
hazard
amenity
Fire insurance
environmental values
resource
Risk management
Disasters
Ecosystems
disaster
incentive
Fires
Managers
mitigation
safety
mountain

Keywords

  • Environment
  • Hazard
  • Multimethod research
  • U.S. Southwest
  • Vulnerability
  • Wildfire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Pollution

Cite this

Situating hazard vulnerability : People's negotiations with wildfire environments in the U.S. Southwest. / Collins, Timothy W.; Bolin, Robert.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 441-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3adf7a2c849d45bab044ff3756630bab,
title = "Situating hazard vulnerability: People's negotiations with wildfire environments in the U.S. Southwest",
abstract = "This article is based on a multimethod study designed to clarify influences on wildfire hazard vulnerability in Arizona's White Mountains, USA. Findings reveal that multiple factors operating across scales generate socially unequal wildfire risks. At the household scale, conflicting environmental values, reliance on fire insurance and firefighting institutions, a lack of place dependency, and social vulnerability (e.g., a lack of financial, physical, and/or legal capacity to reduce risks) were found to be important influences on wildfire risk. At the regional-scale, the shift from a resource extraction to environmental amenity-based economy has transformed ecological communities, produced unequal social distributions of risks and resources, and shaped people's social and environmental interactions in everyday life. While working-class locals are more socially vulnerable than amenity migrants to wildfire hazards, they have also been more active in attempting to reduce risks in the aftermath of the disastrous 2002 Rodeo-Chediski fire. Social tensions between locals and amenity migrants temporarily dissolved immediately following the disaster, only to be exacerbated by the heightened perception of risk and the differential commitment to hazard mitigation displayed by these groups over a 2-year study period. Findings suggest that to enhance wildfire safety, environmental managers should acknowledge the environmental benefits associated with hazardous landscapes, the incentives created by risk management programs, and the specific constraints to action for relevant social groups in changing human-environmental context.",
keywords = "Environment, Hazard, Multimethod research, U.S. Southwest, Vulnerability, Wildfire",
author = "Collins, {Timothy W.} and Robert Bolin",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-009-9333-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "441--455",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Situating hazard vulnerability

T2 - People's negotiations with wildfire environments in the U.S. Southwest

AU - Collins, Timothy W.

AU - Bolin, Robert

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - This article is based on a multimethod study designed to clarify influences on wildfire hazard vulnerability in Arizona's White Mountains, USA. Findings reveal that multiple factors operating across scales generate socially unequal wildfire risks. At the household scale, conflicting environmental values, reliance on fire insurance and firefighting institutions, a lack of place dependency, and social vulnerability (e.g., a lack of financial, physical, and/or legal capacity to reduce risks) were found to be important influences on wildfire risk. At the regional-scale, the shift from a resource extraction to environmental amenity-based economy has transformed ecological communities, produced unequal social distributions of risks and resources, and shaped people's social and environmental interactions in everyday life. While working-class locals are more socially vulnerable than amenity migrants to wildfire hazards, they have also been more active in attempting to reduce risks in the aftermath of the disastrous 2002 Rodeo-Chediski fire. Social tensions between locals and amenity migrants temporarily dissolved immediately following the disaster, only to be exacerbated by the heightened perception of risk and the differential commitment to hazard mitigation displayed by these groups over a 2-year study period. Findings suggest that to enhance wildfire safety, environmental managers should acknowledge the environmental benefits associated with hazardous landscapes, the incentives created by risk management programs, and the specific constraints to action for relevant social groups in changing human-environmental context.

AB - This article is based on a multimethod study designed to clarify influences on wildfire hazard vulnerability in Arizona's White Mountains, USA. Findings reveal that multiple factors operating across scales generate socially unequal wildfire risks. At the household scale, conflicting environmental values, reliance on fire insurance and firefighting institutions, a lack of place dependency, and social vulnerability (e.g., a lack of financial, physical, and/or legal capacity to reduce risks) were found to be important influences on wildfire risk. At the regional-scale, the shift from a resource extraction to environmental amenity-based economy has transformed ecological communities, produced unequal social distributions of risks and resources, and shaped people's social and environmental interactions in everyday life. While working-class locals are more socially vulnerable than amenity migrants to wildfire hazards, they have also been more active in attempting to reduce risks in the aftermath of the disastrous 2002 Rodeo-Chediski fire. Social tensions between locals and amenity migrants temporarily dissolved immediately following the disaster, only to be exacerbated by the heightened perception of risk and the differential commitment to hazard mitigation displayed by these groups over a 2-year study period. Findings suggest that to enhance wildfire safety, environmental managers should acknowledge the environmental benefits associated with hazardous landscapes, the incentives created by risk management programs, and the specific constraints to action for relevant social groups in changing human-environmental context.

KW - Environment

KW - Hazard

KW - Multimethod research

KW - U.S. Southwest

KW - Vulnerability

KW - Wildfire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68849128289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68849128289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-009-9333-5

DO - 10.1007/s00267-009-9333-5

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 441

EP - 455

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 3

ER -