Situated Citizenship: Understanding Sikh Citizenship through Women’s Exclusion

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Democratization scholars point to institutional indicators to argue that Indian democracy is consolidated and Indian women are full citizens. I point to another set of data to demonstrate that Indian democracy is at risk because of the gendered nature of citizenship. I argue that institutional indicators tell a very limited story, because they often render women and gender invisible. I analyze situated citizenship through semi-structured, in-depth interview data. I find that respondents naturalize gendered citizenship, which results in a demarcation of home and marriage as the natural space of Sikh women. I find a situation of exclusionary inclusion, where women are an essential part of formal institutional democracy, but are unable to acquire full, substantive citizenship because they are understood as restricted to home and marriage. These results suggest that Indian democracy is weaker than democratization literature would suggest because women experience democracy differentially; women do not have the actual power to be active as citizens, to enjoy a bundle of rights, and to command democratic participation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)386-401
    JournalPolitics, Groups, and Identities
    Volume2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    citizenship
    exclusion
    democracy
    marriage
    citizen
    democratization
    inclusion
    participation
    gender
    experience

    Cite this

    Situated Citizenship: Understanding Sikh Citizenship through Women’s Exclusion. / Behl, Natasha.

    In: Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 2, 2014, p. 386-401.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{18f6474d88b7400f83750f030b201049,
    title = "Situated Citizenship: Understanding Sikh Citizenship through Women’s Exclusion",
    abstract = "Democratization scholars point to institutional indicators to argue that Indian democracy is consolidated and Indian women are full citizens. I point to another set of data to demonstrate that Indian democracy is at risk because of the gendered nature of citizenship. I argue that institutional indicators tell a very limited story, because they often render women and gender invisible. I analyze situated citizenship through semi-structured, in-depth interview data. I find that respondents naturalize gendered citizenship, which results in a demarcation of home and marriage as the natural space of Sikh women. I find a situation of exclusionary inclusion, where women are an essential part of formal institutional democracy, but are unable to acquire full, substantive citizenship because they are understood as restricted to home and marriage. These results suggest that Indian democracy is weaker than democratization literature would suggest because women experience democracy differentially; women do not have the actual power to be active as citizens, to enjoy a bundle of rights, and to command democratic participation.",
    author = "Natasha Behl",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1080/21565503.2014.927775",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2",
    pages = "386--401",
    journal = "Politics, Groups, and Identities",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Situated Citizenship: Understanding Sikh Citizenship through Women’s Exclusion

    AU - Behl, Natasha

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Democratization scholars point to institutional indicators to argue that Indian democracy is consolidated and Indian women are full citizens. I point to another set of data to demonstrate that Indian democracy is at risk because of the gendered nature of citizenship. I argue that institutional indicators tell a very limited story, because they often render women and gender invisible. I analyze situated citizenship through semi-structured, in-depth interview data. I find that respondents naturalize gendered citizenship, which results in a demarcation of home and marriage as the natural space of Sikh women. I find a situation of exclusionary inclusion, where women are an essential part of formal institutional democracy, but are unable to acquire full, substantive citizenship because they are understood as restricted to home and marriage. These results suggest that Indian democracy is weaker than democratization literature would suggest because women experience democracy differentially; women do not have the actual power to be active as citizens, to enjoy a bundle of rights, and to command democratic participation.

    AB - Democratization scholars point to institutional indicators to argue that Indian democracy is consolidated and Indian women are full citizens. I point to another set of data to demonstrate that Indian democracy is at risk because of the gendered nature of citizenship. I argue that institutional indicators tell a very limited story, because they often render women and gender invisible. I analyze situated citizenship through semi-structured, in-depth interview data. I find that respondents naturalize gendered citizenship, which results in a demarcation of home and marriage as the natural space of Sikh women. I find a situation of exclusionary inclusion, where women are an essential part of formal institutional democracy, but are unable to acquire full, substantive citizenship because they are understood as restricted to home and marriage. These results suggest that Indian democracy is weaker than democratization literature would suggest because women experience democracy differentially; women do not have the actual power to be active as citizens, to enjoy a bundle of rights, and to command democratic participation.

    U2 - 10.1080/21565503.2014.927775

    DO - 10.1080/21565503.2014.927775

    M3 - Article

    VL - 2

    SP - 386

    EP - 401

    JO - Politics, Groups, and Identities

    JF - Politics, Groups, and Identities

    ER -