Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage

Ashok Sekar, Eric Williams, Mikhail Chester

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) for coal power plants reduces onsite carbon dioxide emissions, but affects other air emissions on and offsite. This research assesses the net societal benefits and costs of Monoethanolamine (MEA) CCS, valuing changes in emissions of CO2, SO2, NOX, NH3 and particulate matter (PM), including those in the supply chain. Geographical variability and stochastic uncertainty for 407 coal power plant locations in the U.S. are analyzed. The results show that the net environmental benefits and costs of MEA CCS depend critically on location. For a few favorable sites of both power plant and upstream processes, CCS realizes a net benefit (benefit-cost ratio >1) if the social cost of carbon exceeds $51/ton. For much of the U.S. however, the social cost of carbon must be much higher to realize net benefits from CCS, up to a maximum of $910/ton. While the social costs of carbon are uncertain, typical estimates are in the range of $32-220 per ton, much lower than the breakeven value for many potential CCS locations. Increased impacts upstream from the power plant can dramatically change the social acceptability of CCS and needs further consideration and analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11705-11712
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume48
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 7 2014

Fingerprint

Carbon capture
carbon
Power plants
Costs
Ethanolamine
Carbon
power plant
Coal
Particulate Matter
Carbon Dioxide
coal
Supply chains
cost
particulate matter
carbon dioxide
Air

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage. / Sekar, Ashok; Williams, Eric; Chester, Mikhail.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 48, No. 19, 07.10.2014, p. 11705-11712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{18419e6ff53247c2be288819989f802e,
title = "Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage",
abstract = "Carbon capture and storage (CCS) for coal power plants reduces onsite carbon dioxide emissions, but affects other air emissions on and offsite. This research assesses the net societal benefits and costs of Monoethanolamine (MEA) CCS, valuing changes in emissions of CO2, SO2, NOX, NH3 and particulate matter (PM), including those in the supply chain. Geographical variability and stochastic uncertainty for 407 coal power plant locations in the U.S. are analyzed. The results show that the net environmental benefits and costs of MEA CCS depend critically on location. For a few favorable sites of both power plant and upstream processes, CCS realizes a net benefit (benefit-cost ratio >1) if the social cost of carbon exceeds $51/ton. For much of the U.S. however, the social cost of carbon must be much higher to realize net benefits from CCS, up to a maximum of $910/ton. While the social costs of carbon are uncertain, typical estimates are in the range of $32-220 per ton, much lower than the breakeven value for many potential CCS locations. Increased impacts upstream from the power plant can dramatically change the social acceptability of CCS and needs further consideration and analysis.",
author = "Ashok Sekar and Eric Williams and Mikhail Chester",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1021/es5003764",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "11705--11712",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage

AU - Sekar, Ashok

AU - Williams, Eric

AU - Chester, Mikhail

PY - 2014/10/7

Y1 - 2014/10/7

N2 - Carbon capture and storage (CCS) for coal power plants reduces onsite carbon dioxide emissions, but affects other air emissions on and offsite. This research assesses the net societal benefits and costs of Monoethanolamine (MEA) CCS, valuing changes in emissions of CO2, SO2, NOX, NH3 and particulate matter (PM), including those in the supply chain. Geographical variability and stochastic uncertainty for 407 coal power plant locations in the U.S. are analyzed. The results show that the net environmental benefits and costs of MEA CCS depend critically on location. For a few favorable sites of both power plant and upstream processes, CCS realizes a net benefit (benefit-cost ratio >1) if the social cost of carbon exceeds $51/ton. For much of the U.S. however, the social cost of carbon must be much higher to realize net benefits from CCS, up to a maximum of $910/ton. While the social costs of carbon are uncertain, typical estimates are in the range of $32-220 per ton, much lower than the breakeven value for many potential CCS locations. Increased impacts upstream from the power plant can dramatically change the social acceptability of CCS and needs further consideration and analysis.

AB - Carbon capture and storage (CCS) for coal power plants reduces onsite carbon dioxide emissions, but affects other air emissions on and offsite. This research assesses the net societal benefits and costs of Monoethanolamine (MEA) CCS, valuing changes in emissions of CO2, SO2, NOX, NH3 and particulate matter (PM), including those in the supply chain. Geographical variability and stochastic uncertainty for 407 coal power plant locations in the U.S. are analyzed. The results show that the net environmental benefits and costs of MEA CCS depend critically on location. For a few favorable sites of both power plant and upstream processes, CCS realizes a net benefit (benefit-cost ratio >1) if the social cost of carbon exceeds $51/ton. For much of the U.S. however, the social cost of carbon must be much higher to realize net benefits from CCS, up to a maximum of $910/ton. While the social costs of carbon are uncertain, typical estimates are in the range of $32-220 per ton, much lower than the breakeven value for many potential CCS locations. Increased impacts upstream from the power plant can dramatically change the social acceptability of CCS and needs further consideration and analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907934224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907934224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/es5003764

DO - 10.1021/es5003764

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 11705

EP - 11712

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 19

ER -