Single molecule detection of DNA looping by NgoMIV restriction endonuclease

Zivile Katiliene, Evaldas Katilius, Neal Woodbury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy were used to investigate DNA looping by NgoMIV restriction endonuclease. Using a linear double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) molecule labeled with a fluorescence donor molecule, Cy3, and fluorescence acceptor molecule, Cy5, and by varying the concentration of NgoMIV endonuclease from 0 to 3 × 10-6 M, it was possible to detect and determine diffusion properties of looped DNA/protein complexes. FRET efficiency distributions revealed a subpopulation of complexes with an energy transfer efficiency of 30%, which appeared upon addition of enzyme in the picomolar to nanomolar concentration range (using 10-11 M dsDNA). The concentration dependence, fluorescence burst size analysis, and fluorescence correlation analysis were all consistent with this subpopulation arising from a sequence specific interaction between an individual enzyme and a DNA molecule. A 30% FRET efficiency corresponds to a distance of ∼65 Å, which correlates well with the distance between the ends of the dsDNA molecule when bound to NgoMIV according to the crystal structure of this complex. Formation of the looped complexes was also evident in measurements of the diffusion times of freely diffusing DNA molecules with and without NgoMIV. At very high protein concentrations compared to the DNA concentration, FRET and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy results revealed the formation of larger DNA/protein complexes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4053-4061
Number of pages9
JournalBiophysical journal
Volume84
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Single molecule detection of DNA looping by NgoMIV restriction endonuclease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this