Similarities and Differences between LaNiO2 and CaCuO2 and Implications for Superconductivity

A. S. Botana, M. R. Norman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

The recent observation of superconductivity in hole-doped NdNiO2 has generated considerable attention. The similarities and differences between this infinite-layer nickelates and cuprates are still an open question. To address this issue we derive, via-principles calculations, essential facts related to the electronic structure and magnetism of RNiO2 (R=La, Nd) in comparison to their cuprate analog CaCuO2. From this detailed comparison, we find that RNiO2 are promising as cuprate analogs. Besides the much larger d-p energy splitting, and the presence of R 5d states near the Fermi energy in the parent compound, all other electronic-structure parameters seem to be favorable in the context of superconductivity as inferred from the cuprates. In particular, the large value of the longer-range hopping t′ and the eg energy splitting are similar to those obtained in cuprates. Doping further acts to increase the cupratelike character of these nickelates by suppressing the self-doping effect of the R 5d bands.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number011024
JournalPhysical Review X
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Similarities and Differences between LaNiO2 and CaCuO2 and Implications for Superconductivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this