Signals, signal devices, and signal space in organisations: A conceptual lens to crisis evasion

Kevin C. Desouza, Tobin Hensgen, J. Roberto Evaristo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given that warning signs precedes all crises it is surprising that not much attention has been given to understand why these signals 'disappear' and may not appear again until after some 'avoidable' calamity has reoccurred. Disasters are often anecdotally anteceded by stories involving unheeded predictions. It is commonly recognised that the path a signal traverses through has significant bearings on whether the right decision maker will receive the intended information. Given the many opportunities the path affords the signal to be lost or rendered useless. This may reflect on the notion that no amount of technology can overcome recognised frailties in the human thought processes. Organisations that are aware of this condition have an advantage. In the following paper, we draw from the literatures on electrical engineering, signal processing, information theory, cognitive psychology, and communication theory to explain the crucial reasons signals can be lost in an organisation. To this end, we propose a conceptualisation of signal devices in organisations, the collection of which along with signals makes up the signal space of the organisation. Following this we look at key issues in dealing with signals of impending crises. We also use case studies of Operation Iraqi Freedom and the 9-11 terrorism attacks to ground our model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Emergency Management
Volume2
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lenses
Organizations
Equipment and Supplies
2003-2011 Iraq War
Information Theory
Terrorism
Disasters
Communication
Psychology
Technology

Keywords

  • Amplification
  • Cognitive dissonance
  • Crisis
  • Crisis management
  • Entropy
  • Information
  • Pre-crisis
  • Signal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Signals, signal devices, and signal space in organisations : A conceptual lens to crisis evasion. / Desouza, Kevin C.; Hensgen, Tobin; Evaristo, J. Roberto.

In: International Journal of Emergency Management, Vol. 2, No. 1-2, 2004, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Desouza, Kevin C. ; Hensgen, Tobin ; Evaristo, J. Roberto. / Signals, signal devices, and signal space in organisations : A conceptual lens to crisis evasion. In: International Journal of Emergency Management. 2004 ; Vol. 2, No. 1-2. pp. 1-21.
@article{e0c3ae98eb1f4dc7bf80dfce1fec97f1,
title = "Signals, signal devices, and signal space in organisations: A conceptual lens to crisis evasion",
abstract = "Given that warning signs precedes all crises it is surprising that not much attention has been given to understand why these signals 'disappear' and may not appear again until after some 'avoidable' calamity has reoccurred. Disasters are often anecdotally anteceded by stories involving unheeded predictions. It is commonly recognised that the path a signal traverses through has significant bearings on whether the right decision maker will receive the intended information. Given the many opportunities the path affords the signal to be lost or rendered useless. This may reflect on the notion that no amount of technology can overcome recognised frailties in the human thought processes. Organisations that are aware of this condition have an advantage. In the following paper, we draw from the literatures on electrical engineering, signal processing, information theory, cognitive psychology, and communication theory to explain the crucial reasons signals can be lost in an organisation. To this end, we propose a conceptualisation of signal devices in organisations, the collection of which along with signals makes up the signal space of the organisation. Following this we look at key issues in dealing with signals of impending crises. We also use case studies of Operation Iraqi Freedom and the 9-11 terrorism attacks to ground our model.",
keywords = "Amplification, Cognitive dissonance, Crisis, Crisis management, Entropy, Information, Pre-crisis, Signal",
author = "Desouza, {Kevin C.} and Tobin Hensgen and Evaristo, {J. Roberto}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1504/IJEM.2004.005227",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "International Journal of Emergency Management",
issn = "1471-4825",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Signals, signal devices, and signal space in organisations

T2 - A conceptual lens to crisis evasion

AU - Desouza, Kevin C.

AU - Hensgen, Tobin

AU - Evaristo, J. Roberto

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Given that warning signs precedes all crises it is surprising that not much attention has been given to understand why these signals 'disappear' and may not appear again until after some 'avoidable' calamity has reoccurred. Disasters are often anecdotally anteceded by stories involving unheeded predictions. It is commonly recognised that the path a signal traverses through has significant bearings on whether the right decision maker will receive the intended information. Given the many opportunities the path affords the signal to be lost or rendered useless. This may reflect on the notion that no amount of technology can overcome recognised frailties in the human thought processes. Organisations that are aware of this condition have an advantage. In the following paper, we draw from the literatures on electrical engineering, signal processing, information theory, cognitive psychology, and communication theory to explain the crucial reasons signals can be lost in an organisation. To this end, we propose a conceptualisation of signal devices in organisations, the collection of which along with signals makes up the signal space of the organisation. Following this we look at key issues in dealing with signals of impending crises. We also use case studies of Operation Iraqi Freedom and the 9-11 terrorism attacks to ground our model.

AB - Given that warning signs precedes all crises it is surprising that not much attention has been given to understand why these signals 'disappear' and may not appear again until after some 'avoidable' calamity has reoccurred. Disasters are often anecdotally anteceded by stories involving unheeded predictions. It is commonly recognised that the path a signal traverses through has significant bearings on whether the right decision maker will receive the intended information. Given the many opportunities the path affords the signal to be lost or rendered useless. This may reflect on the notion that no amount of technology can overcome recognised frailties in the human thought processes. Organisations that are aware of this condition have an advantage. In the following paper, we draw from the literatures on electrical engineering, signal processing, information theory, cognitive psychology, and communication theory to explain the crucial reasons signals can be lost in an organisation. To this end, we propose a conceptualisation of signal devices in organisations, the collection of which along with signals makes up the signal space of the organisation. Following this we look at key issues in dealing with signals of impending crises. We also use case studies of Operation Iraqi Freedom and the 9-11 terrorism attacks to ground our model.

KW - Amplification

KW - Cognitive dissonance

KW - Crisis

KW - Crisis management

KW - Entropy

KW - Information

KW - Pre-crisis

KW - Signal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5744244898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5744244898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJEM.2004.005227

DO - 10.1504/IJEM.2004.005227

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:5744244898

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - International Journal of Emergency Management

JF - International Journal of Emergency Management

SN - 1471-4825

IS - 1-2

ER -