Signaling Safety: Characterizing Fieldwork Experiences and Their Implications for Career Trajectories

Robin G. Nelson, Julienne N. Rutherford, Katherine Hinde, Kathryn B.H. Clancy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous studies use quantitative measures to evaluate retention, advancement, and success in academic settings. Such approaches, however, present challenges for evaluating the lived experiences of academics. Here, we present a qualitative thematic analysis of self-reports of positive and negative experiences that occurred while conducting academic field research. Twenty-six semistructured interviews highlighted two central themes: (1) variability in clarity of appropriate professional behavior and rules at fieldsites, and (2) access, or obstacles therein, to professional resources and opportunity. In some instances, respondent narratives recalled a lack of consequences for violations of rules governing appropriate conduct. These violations included harassment and assault, and ultimately disruptions to career trajectories. A heuristic construct of a traffic light describing Red, Yellow, and Green experiences illustrates the ramifications of this distribution of clarity and access within fieldsite contexts. These results extend the findings from our previously reported Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE) about the climates and contexts created and experienced in field research settings. Moreover, this study addresses specific tactics, such as policies, procedures, and paradigms that fieldsite directors and principal investigators can implement to improve field experiences and better achieve equal opportunity in field research settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Anthropologist
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

career
field research
experience
equal opportunity
assault
tactics
director
heuristics
Field Research
Trajectory
Safety
Field Work
climate
traffic
paradigm
narrative
lack
interview
Field Experience
Violations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Signaling Safety : Characterizing Fieldwork Experiences and Their Implications for Career Trajectories. / Nelson, Robin G.; Rutherford, Julienne N.; Hinde, Katherine; Clancy, Kathryn B.H.

In: American Anthropologist, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cfb1f74450284b1bb0efe541e7a72c80,
title = "Signaling Safety: Characterizing Fieldwork Experiences and Their Implications for Career Trajectories",
abstract = "Numerous studies use quantitative measures to evaluate retention, advancement, and success in academic settings. Such approaches, however, present challenges for evaluating the lived experiences of academics. Here, we present a qualitative thematic analysis of self-reports of positive and negative experiences that occurred while conducting academic field research. Twenty-six semistructured interviews highlighted two central themes: (1) variability in clarity of appropriate professional behavior and rules at fieldsites, and (2) access, or obstacles therein, to professional resources and opportunity. In some instances, respondent narratives recalled a lack of consequences for violations of rules governing appropriate conduct. These violations included harassment and assault, and ultimately disruptions to career trajectories. A heuristic construct of a traffic light describing Red, Yellow, and Green experiences illustrates the ramifications of this distribution of clarity and access within fieldsite contexts. These results extend the findings from our previously reported Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE) about the climates and contexts created and experienced in field research settings. Moreover, this study addresses specific tactics, such as policies, procedures, and paradigms that fieldsite directors and principal investigators can implement to improve field experiences and better achieve equal opportunity in field research settings.",
author = "Nelson, {Robin G.} and Rutherford, {Julienne N.} and Katherine Hinde and Clancy, {Kathryn B.H.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/aman.12929",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Anthropologist",
issn = "1548-1433",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Signaling Safety

T2 - Characterizing Fieldwork Experiences and Their Implications for Career Trajectories

AU - Nelson, Robin G.

AU - Rutherford, Julienne N.

AU - Hinde, Katherine

AU - Clancy, Kathryn B.H.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Numerous studies use quantitative measures to evaluate retention, advancement, and success in academic settings. Such approaches, however, present challenges for evaluating the lived experiences of academics. Here, we present a qualitative thematic analysis of self-reports of positive and negative experiences that occurred while conducting academic field research. Twenty-six semistructured interviews highlighted two central themes: (1) variability in clarity of appropriate professional behavior and rules at fieldsites, and (2) access, or obstacles therein, to professional resources and opportunity. In some instances, respondent narratives recalled a lack of consequences for violations of rules governing appropriate conduct. These violations included harassment and assault, and ultimately disruptions to career trajectories. A heuristic construct of a traffic light describing Red, Yellow, and Green experiences illustrates the ramifications of this distribution of clarity and access within fieldsite contexts. These results extend the findings from our previously reported Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE) about the climates and contexts created and experienced in field research settings. Moreover, this study addresses specific tactics, such as policies, procedures, and paradigms that fieldsite directors and principal investigators can implement to improve field experiences and better achieve equal opportunity in field research settings.

AB - Numerous studies use quantitative measures to evaluate retention, advancement, and success in academic settings. Such approaches, however, present challenges for evaluating the lived experiences of academics. Here, we present a qualitative thematic analysis of self-reports of positive and negative experiences that occurred while conducting academic field research. Twenty-six semistructured interviews highlighted two central themes: (1) variability in clarity of appropriate professional behavior and rules at fieldsites, and (2) access, or obstacles therein, to professional resources and opportunity. In some instances, respondent narratives recalled a lack of consequences for violations of rules governing appropriate conduct. These violations included harassment and assault, and ultimately disruptions to career trajectories. A heuristic construct of a traffic light describing Red, Yellow, and Green experiences illustrates the ramifications of this distribution of clarity and access within fieldsite contexts. These results extend the findings from our previously reported Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE) about the climates and contexts created and experienced in field research settings. Moreover, this study addresses specific tactics, such as policies, procedures, and paradigms that fieldsite directors and principal investigators can implement to improve field experiences and better achieve equal opportunity in field research settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031105538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031105538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/aman.12929

DO - 10.1111/aman.12929

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85031105538

JO - American Anthropologist

JF - American Anthropologist

SN - 1548-1433

ER -