Signal Detection as a Function of Contralateral Sinusoid-to-Noise Ratio

William Yost, M. J. Penner, L. L. Feth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Detection of a masked signal (500 Hz) at one ear was measured while a sinusoid of the same frequency and a noise were presented to the contralateral ear. Both the signal and the contralateral sinusoids were pulsed, and they were either in phase or inverted. The noise at the signal ear was presented continuously at a spectrum level of 40 dB. In Expt. 1, the same continuous noise was presented to the contralateral ear at a spectrum level of 40 dB and in phase with the noise in the signal ear. The contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio was varied by changing the level of the sinusoid. In Expt. 2, the contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio was held constant while the levels of both the contralateral sinusoid and the contralateral noise were varied. When the contralateral sinusoid and noise are intense, a 50-dB increase in the contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio causes a 25- to 35-dB change in the signal-to-noise ratio required for detection. The results show that contralateral stimulation can either enhance or degrade detection of a monaural signal. The results are compared to data from investigations of masking-level difference, central masking, and monarual detection with contralateral cue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1966-1970
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume51
Issue number6B
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1972
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

signal detection
sine waves
ear
masking
monaural signals
continuous noise
Signal Detection
Ear
cues
stimulation
signal to noise ratios
causes
Masking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Signal Detection as a Function of Contralateral Sinusoid-to-Noise Ratio. / Yost, William; Penner, M. J.; Feth, L. L.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 51, No. 6B, 01.01.1972, p. 1966-1970.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e22d4398d8144f84b0862a577070aaa3,
title = "Signal Detection as a Function of Contralateral Sinusoid-to-Noise Ratio",
abstract = "Detection of a masked signal (500 Hz) at one ear was measured while a sinusoid of the same frequency and a noise were presented to the contralateral ear. Both the signal and the contralateral sinusoids were pulsed, and they were either in phase or inverted. The noise at the signal ear was presented continuously at a spectrum level of 40 dB. In Expt. 1, the same continuous noise was presented to the contralateral ear at a spectrum level of 40 dB and in phase with the noise in the signal ear. The contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio was varied by changing the level of the sinusoid. In Expt. 2, the contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio was held constant while the levels of both the contralateral sinusoid and the contralateral noise were varied. When the contralateral sinusoid and noise are intense, a 50-dB increase in the contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio causes a 25- to 35-dB change in the signal-to-noise ratio required for detection. The results show that contralateral stimulation can either enhance or degrade detection of a monaural signal. The results are compared to data from investigations of masking-level difference, central masking, and monarual detection with contralateral cue.",
author = "William Yost and Penner, {M. J.} and Feth, {L. L.}",
year = "1972",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.1913057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1966--1970",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "6B",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Signal Detection as a Function of Contralateral Sinusoid-to-Noise Ratio

AU - Yost, William

AU - Penner, M. J.

AU - Feth, L. L.

PY - 1972/1/1

Y1 - 1972/1/1

N2 - Detection of a masked signal (500 Hz) at one ear was measured while a sinusoid of the same frequency and a noise were presented to the contralateral ear. Both the signal and the contralateral sinusoids were pulsed, and they were either in phase or inverted. The noise at the signal ear was presented continuously at a spectrum level of 40 dB. In Expt. 1, the same continuous noise was presented to the contralateral ear at a spectrum level of 40 dB and in phase with the noise in the signal ear. The contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio was varied by changing the level of the sinusoid. In Expt. 2, the contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio was held constant while the levels of both the contralateral sinusoid and the contralateral noise were varied. When the contralateral sinusoid and noise are intense, a 50-dB increase in the contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio causes a 25- to 35-dB change in the signal-to-noise ratio required for detection. The results show that contralateral stimulation can either enhance or degrade detection of a monaural signal. The results are compared to data from investigations of masking-level difference, central masking, and monarual detection with contralateral cue.

AB - Detection of a masked signal (500 Hz) at one ear was measured while a sinusoid of the same frequency and a noise were presented to the contralateral ear. Both the signal and the contralateral sinusoids were pulsed, and they were either in phase or inverted. The noise at the signal ear was presented continuously at a spectrum level of 40 dB. In Expt. 1, the same continuous noise was presented to the contralateral ear at a spectrum level of 40 dB and in phase with the noise in the signal ear. The contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio was varied by changing the level of the sinusoid. In Expt. 2, the contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio was held constant while the levels of both the contralateral sinusoid and the contralateral noise were varied. When the contralateral sinusoid and noise are intense, a 50-dB increase in the contralateral sinusoid-to-noise ratio causes a 25- to 35-dB change in the signal-to-noise ratio required for detection. The results show that contralateral stimulation can either enhance or degrade detection of a monaural signal. The results are compared to data from investigations of masking-level difference, central masking, and monarual detection with contralateral cue.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0015352595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0015352595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.1913057

DO - 10.1121/1.1913057

M3 - Article

C2 - 5045257

AN - SCOPUS:0015352595

VL - 51

SP - 1966

EP - 1970

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 6B

ER -