Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches. Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably. Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future. Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination. Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number37
JournalEcology and Society
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

sustainability
innovation
science
laboratory

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Adaptive capacity
  • Resilience theory
  • Sustainability science
  • Transformation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits? / Redman, Charles.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 19, No. 2, 37, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d3f3f2b42fda4812961d8d4f8abfdf31,
title = "Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits?",
abstract = "It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches. Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably. Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future. Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination. Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Adaptive capacity, Resilience theory, Sustainability science, Transformation",
author = "Charles Redman",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5751/ES-06390-190237",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits?

AU - Redman, Charles

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches. Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably. Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future. Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination. Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.

AB - It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches. Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably. Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future. Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination. Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Adaptive capacity

KW - Resilience theory

KW - Sustainability science

KW - Transformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903748156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903748156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-06390-190237

DO - 10.5751/ES-06390-190237

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 2

M1 - 37

ER -