Short-term practice effects in mild cognitive impairment: Evaluating different methods of change

Kevin Duff, Taylor J. Atkinson, Kayla R. Suhrie, Bonnie C Allred Dalley, Sydney Schaefer, Dustin B. Hammers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Practice effects are improvements on cognitive tests as a result of repeated exposure to testing material. However, variability exists in the literature about whether patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) display practice effects, which may be partially due to the methods used to calculate these changes on repeated tests. The purpose of the current study was to examine multiple methods of assessing short-term practice effects in 58 older adults with MCI. The cognitive battery, which included tests of memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised) and processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Trail Making Test Parts A and B), was administered twice across one week. Dependent t tests showed statistically significant improvement on memory scores (ps < .01, ds = 0.8–1.3), but not on processing speed scores. Despite this, the sample showed no clinically meaningful improvement on any cognitive scores using three different reliable change indices. Regression-based change scores did identify relatively large groups of participants who showed smaller than expected practice effects, which may indicate that this method is more sensitive in identifying individuals who may portend a declining trajectory. Practice effects remain a complex construct, worthy of continued investigation in diverse clinical conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 19 2016

Fingerprint

Trail Making Test
Materials Testing
Verbal Learning
Practice (Psychology)
Cognitive Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Cognitive change
  • Memory
  • Mild cognitive impairment
  • Practice effects
  • Reliable change index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Short-term practice effects in mild cognitive impairment : Evaluating different methods of change. / Duff, Kevin; Atkinson, Taylor J.; Suhrie, Kayla R.; Dalley, Bonnie C Allred; Schaefer, Sydney; Hammers, Dustin B.

In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19.09.2016, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duff, Kevin ; Atkinson, Taylor J. ; Suhrie, Kayla R. ; Dalley, Bonnie C Allred ; Schaefer, Sydney ; Hammers, Dustin B. / Short-term practice effects in mild cognitive impairment : Evaluating different methods of change. In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2016 ; pp. 1-12.
@article{b381335b98c44a0a9288759ee436b915,
title = "Short-term practice effects in mild cognitive impairment: Evaluating different methods of change",
abstract = "Practice effects are improvements on cognitive tests as a result of repeated exposure to testing material. However, variability exists in the literature about whether patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) display practice effects, which may be partially due to the methods used to calculate these changes on repeated tests. The purpose of the current study was to examine multiple methods of assessing short-term practice effects in 58 older adults with MCI. The cognitive battery, which included tests of memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised) and processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Trail Making Test Parts A and B), was administered twice across one week. Dependent t tests showed statistically significant improvement on memory scores (ps < .01, ds = 0.8–1.3), but not on processing speed scores. Despite this, the sample showed no clinically meaningful improvement on any cognitive scores using three different reliable change indices. Regression-based change scores did identify relatively large groups of participants who showed smaller than expected practice effects, which may indicate that this method is more sensitive in identifying individuals who may portend a declining trajectory. Practice effects remain a complex construct, worthy of continued investigation in diverse clinical conditions.",
keywords = "Cognitive change, Memory, Mild cognitive impairment, Practice effects, Reliable change index",
author = "Kevin Duff and Atkinson, {Taylor J.} and Suhrie, {Kayla R.} and Dalley, {Bonnie C Allred} and Sydney Schaefer and Hammers, {Dustin B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1080/13803395.2016.1230596",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology",
issn = "0168-8634",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short-term practice effects in mild cognitive impairment

T2 - Evaluating different methods of change

AU - Duff, Kevin

AU - Atkinson, Taylor J.

AU - Suhrie, Kayla R.

AU - Dalley, Bonnie C Allred

AU - Schaefer, Sydney

AU - Hammers, Dustin B.

PY - 2016/9/19

Y1 - 2016/9/19

N2 - Practice effects are improvements on cognitive tests as a result of repeated exposure to testing material. However, variability exists in the literature about whether patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) display practice effects, which may be partially due to the methods used to calculate these changes on repeated tests. The purpose of the current study was to examine multiple methods of assessing short-term practice effects in 58 older adults with MCI. The cognitive battery, which included tests of memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised) and processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Trail Making Test Parts A and B), was administered twice across one week. Dependent t tests showed statistically significant improvement on memory scores (ps < .01, ds = 0.8–1.3), but not on processing speed scores. Despite this, the sample showed no clinically meaningful improvement on any cognitive scores using three different reliable change indices. Regression-based change scores did identify relatively large groups of participants who showed smaller than expected practice effects, which may indicate that this method is more sensitive in identifying individuals who may portend a declining trajectory. Practice effects remain a complex construct, worthy of continued investigation in diverse clinical conditions.

AB - Practice effects are improvements on cognitive tests as a result of repeated exposure to testing material. However, variability exists in the literature about whether patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) display practice effects, which may be partially due to the methods used to calculate these changes on repeated tests. The purpose of the current study was to examine multiple methods of assessing short-term practice effects in 58 older adults with MCI. The cognitive battery, which included tests of memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised) and processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Trail Making Test Parts A and B), was administered twice across one week. Dependent t tests showed statistically significant improvement on memory scores (ps < .01, ds = 0.8–1.3), but not on processing speed scores. Despite this, the sample showed no clinically meaningful improvement on any cognitive scores using three different reliable change indices. Regression-based change scores did identify relatively large groups of participants who showed smaller than expected practice effects, which may indicate that this method is more sensitive in identifying individuals who may portend a declining trajectory. Practice effects remain a complex construct, worthy of continued investigation in diverse clinical conditions.

KW - Cognitive change

KW - Memory

KW - Mild cognitive impairment

KW - Practice effects

KW - Reliable change index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988422483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988422483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13803395.2016.1230596

DO - 10.1080/13803395.2016.1230596

M3 - Article

C2 - 27646966

AN - SCOPUS:84988422483

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

SN - 0168-8634

ER -