Shared norms and their explanation for the social clustering of obesity

Daniel Hruschka, Alexandra Slade, Amber Wutich, Benjamin Morin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to test the hypothesized role of shared body size norms in the social contagion of body size and obesity. Methods: Using data collected in 2009 from 101 women and 812 of their social ties in Phoenix, Arizona, we assessed the indirect effect of social norms on shared body mass index (BMI) measured in 3 different ways. Results: We confirmed Christakis and Fowler's basic finding that BMI and obesity do indeed cluster socially, but we found that body size norms accounted for only a small portion of this effect (at most 20%) and only via 1 of the 3 pathways. Conclusions: If shared social norms play only a minor role in the social contagion of obesity, interventions targeted at changing ideas about appropriate BMIs or body sizes may be less useful than those working more directly with behaviors, for example, by changing eating habits or transforming opportunities for and constraints on dietary intake.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume101
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Body Size
Cluster Analysis
Obesity
Body Mass Index
Feeding Behavior
Social Norms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Shared norms and their explanation for the social clustering of obesity. / Hruschka, Daniel; Slade, Alexandra; Wutich, Amber; Morin, Benjamin.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 101, No. SUPPL. 1, 01.12.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29e063f5176f4eea9a3e8f1fac909b28,
title = "Shared norms and their explanation for the social clustering of obesity",
abstract = "Objectives: We aimed to test the hypothesized role of shared body size norms in the social contagion of body size and obesity. Methods: Using data collected in 2009 from 101 women and 812 of their social ties in Phoenix, Arizona, we assessed the indirect effect of social norms on shared body mass index (BMI) measured in 3 different ways. Results: We confirmed Christakis and Fowler's basic finding that BMI and obesity do indeed cluster socially, but we found that body size norms accounted for only a small portion of this effect (at most 20{\%}) and only via 1 of the 3 pathways. Conclusions: If shared social norms play only a minor role in the social contagion of obesity, interventions targeted at changing ideas about appropriate BMIs or body sizes may be less useful than those working more directly with behaviors, for example, by changing eating habits or transforming opportunities for and constraints on dietary intake.",
author = "Daniel Hruschka and Alexandra Slade and Amber Wutich and Benjamin Morin",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2010.300053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shared norms and their explanation for the social clustering of obesity

AU - Hruschka, Daniel

AU - Slade, Alexandra

AU - Wutich, Amber

AU - Morin, Benjamin

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Objectives: We aimed to test the hypothesized role of shared body size norms in the social contagion of body size and obesity. Methods: Using data collected in 2009 from 101 women and 812 of their social ties in Phoenix, Arizona, we assessed the indirect effect of social norms on shared body mass index (BMI) measured in 3 different ways. Results: We confirmed Christakis and Fowler's basic finding that BMI and obesity do indeed cluster socially, but we found that body size norms accounted for only a small portion of this effect (at most 20%) and only via 1 of the 3 pathways. Conclusions: If shared social norms play only a minor role in the social contagion of obesity, interventions targeted at changing ideas about appropriate BMIs or body sizes may be less useful than those working more directly with behaviors, for example, by changing eating habits or transforming opportunities for and constraints on dietary intake.

AB - Objectives: We aimed to test the hypothesized role of shared body size norms in the social contagion of body size and obesity. Methods: Using data collected in 2009 from 101 women and 812 of their social ties in Phoenix, Arizona, we assessed the indirect effect of social norms on shared body mass index (BMI) measured in 3 different ways. Results: We confirmed Christakis and Fowler's basic finding that BMI and obesity do indeed cluster socially, but we found that body size norms accounted for only a small portion of this effect (at most 20%) and only via 1 of the 3 pathways. Conclusions: If shared social norms play only a minor role in the social contagion of obesity, interventions targeted at changing ideas about appropriate BMIs or body sizes may be less useful than those working more directly with behaviors, for example, by changing eating habits or transforming opportunities for and constraints on dietary intake.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81555220081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81555220081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300053

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300053

M3 - Article

VL - 101

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -