Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: Rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects

Robert Greenes, Mor Peleg, Aziz Boxwala, Samson Tu, Vimla Patel, Edward H. Shortliffe

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical practice guideline automation at the point of care is of growing interest, yet most guidelines are authored in unstructured narrative form. Computer-based execution depends on a formal structured representation, and also faces a number of other challenges at all stages of the guideline lifecycle: modeling, authoring, dissemination, implementation, and update. This is because of the multiplicity of conceptual models, authoring tools, authoring approaches, intended applications, implementation platforms, and local interface requirements and operational constraints. Complexity and time required for development and structure are also huge obstacles. These factors argue for convergence on a common shared model for representation that can be the basis of dissemination. A common model would facilitate direct interpretation or mapping to multiple implementation environments. GLIF (GuideLine Interchange Format) is a formal representation model for guidelines, created by the InterMed Collaboratory as a proposed basis for a shared representation. GLIF currently addresses the process of authoring and dissemination; the InterMed team's major focus now is on tools to facilitate these tasks and the mapping to clinical information system environments. Because of limitations in what can be done by a single team with finite resources, however, and the variety of additional perspectives that need to be accommodated, the InterMed team has determined that further development of a shared representation would be best served as an open process in which the world community is engaged. Under the auspices of the HL7 Decision Support Technical Committee, a GLIF Special Interest Group has been established, which is intended to be a forum for collaborative refinement and extension of a standard representation that can support the needs of the guideline lifecycle. Significant areas for future work will need to include demonstrations of effective means for incorporating guidelines at point of care, reconciliation of functional requirements of different models and identification of those most important for supporting practical implementation, improved means for authoring and management of complexity, and methods for automatically analyzing and validating syntax, semantics, and logical consistency of guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Pages201-205
Number of pages5
Volume84
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes
Event10th World Congress on Medical Informatics, MEDINFO 2001 - London, United Kingdom
Duration: Sep 2 2005Sep 5 2005

Other

Other10th World Congress on Medical Informatics, MEDINFO 2001
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period9/2/059/5/05

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Guidelines
Interchanges
Point-of-Care Systems
Identification (control systems)
Information systems
Demonstrations
Automation
Semantics
Public Opinion
Information Systems

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guideline
  • knowledge representation
  • standards development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Greenes, R., Peleg, M., Boxwala, A., Tu, S., Patel, V., & Shortliffe, E. H. (2001). Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: Rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (Vol. 84, pp. 201-205) https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-201

Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines : Rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects. / Greenes, Robert; Peleg, Mor; Boxwala, Aziz; Tu, Samson; Patel, Vimla; Shortliffe, Edward H.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol. 84 2001. p. 201-205.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Greenes, R, Peleg, M, Boxwala, A, Tu, S, Patel, V & Shortliffe, EH 2001, Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: Rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects. in Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. vol. 84, pp. 201-205, 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics, MEDINFO 2001, London, United Kingdom, 9/2/05. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-201
Greenes R, Peleg M, Boxwala A, Tu S, Patel V, Shortliffe EH. Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: Rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol. 84. 2001. p. 201-205 https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-201
Greenes, Robert ; Peleg, Mor ; Boxwala, Aziz ; Tu, Samson ; Patel, Vimla ; Shortliffe, Edward H. / Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines : Rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol. 84 2001. pp. 201-205
@inproceedings{3c47215015bf4f8588e26b05af4110e5,
title = "Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: Rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects",
abstract = "Clinical practice guideline automation at the point of care is of growing interest, yet most guidelines are authored in unstructured narrative form. Computer-based execution depends on a formal structured representation, and also faces a number of other challenges at all stages of the guideline lifecycle: modeling, authoring, dissemination, implementation, and update. This is because of the multiplicity of conceptual models, authoring tools, authoring approaches, intended applications, implementation platforms, and local interface requirements and operational constraints. Complexity and time required for development and structure are also huge obstacles. These factors argue for convergence on a common shared model for representation that can be the basis of dissemination. A common model would facilitate direct interpretation or mapping to multiple implementation environments. GLIF (GuideLine Interchange Format) is a formal representation model for guidelines, created by the InterMed Collaboratory as a proposed basis for a shared representation. GLIF currently addresses the process of authoring and dissemination; the InterMed team's major focus now is on tools to facilitate these tasks and the mapping to clinical information system environments. Because of limitations in what can be done by a single team with finite resources, however, and the variety of additional perspectives that need to be accommodated, the InterMed team has determined that further development of a shared representation would be best served as an open process in which the world community is engaged. Under the auspices of the HL7 Decision Support Technical Committee, a GLIF Special Interest Group has been established, which is intended to be a forum for collaborative refinement and extension of a standard representation that can support the needs of the guideline lifecycle. Significant areas for future work will need to include demonstrations of effective means for incorporating guidelines at point of care, reconciliation of functional requirements of different models and identification of those most important for supporting practical implementation, improved means for authoring and management of complexity, and methods for automatically analyzing and validating syntax, semantics, and logical consistency of guidelines.",
keywords = "Clinical practice guideline, knowledge representation, standards development",
author = "Robert Greenes and Mor Peleg and Aziz Boxwala and Samson Tu and Vimla Patel and Shortliffe, {Edward H.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-201",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "1586031945",
volume = "84",
pages = "201--205",
booktitle = "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines

T2 - Rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects

AU - Greenes, Robert

AU - Peleg, Mor

AU - Boxwala, Aziz

AU - Tu, Samson

AU - Patel, Vimla

AU - Shortliffe, Edward H.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Clinical practice guideline automation at the point of care is of growing interest, yet most guidelines are authored in unstructured narrative form. Computer-based execution depends on a formal structured representation, and also faces a number of other challenges at all stages of the guideline lifecycle: modeling, authoring, dissemination, implementation, and update. This is because of the multiplicity of conceptual models, authoring tools, authoring approaches, intended applications, implementation platforms, and local interface requirements and operational constraints. Complexity and time required for development and structure are also huge obstacles. These factors argue for convergence on a common shared model for representation that can be the basis of dissemination. A common model would facilitate direct interpretation or mapping to multiple implementation environments. GLIF (GuideLine Interchange Format) is a formal representation model for guidelines, created by the InterMed Collaboratory as a proposed basis for a shared representation. GLIF currently addresses the process of authoring and dissemination; the InterMed team's major focus now is on tools to facilitate these tasks and the mapping to clinical information system environments. Because of limitations in what can be done by a single team with finite resources, however, and the variety of additional perspectives that need to be accommodated, the InterMed team has determined that further development of a shared representation would be best served as an open process in which the world community is engaged. Under the auspices of the HL7 Decision Support Technical Committee, a GLIF Special Interest Group has been established, which is intended to be a forum for collaborative refinement and extension of a standard representation that can support the needs of the guideline lifecycle. Significant areas for future work will need to include demonstrations of effective means for incorporating guidelines at point of care, reconciliation of functional requirements of different models and identification of those most important for supporting practical implementation, improved means for authoring and management of complexity, and methods for automatically analyzing and validating syntax, semantics, and logical consistency of guidelines.

AB - Clinical practice guideline automation at the point of care is of growing interest, yet most guidelines are authored in unstructured narrative form. Computer-based execution depends on a formal structured representation, and also faces a number of other challenges at all stages of the guideline lifecycle: modeling, authoring, dissemination, implementation, and update. This is because of the multiplicity of conceptual models, authoring tools, authoring approaches, intended applications, implementation platforms, and local interface requirements and operational constraints. Complexity and time required for development and structure are also huge obstacles. These factors argue for convergence on a common shared model for representation that can be the basis of dissemination. A common model would facilitate direct interpretation or mapping to multiple implementation environments. GLIF (GuideLine Interchange Format) is a formal representation model for guidelines, created by the InterMed Collaboratory as a proposed basis for a shared representation. GLIF currently addresses the process of authoring and dissemination; the InterMed team's major focus now is on tools to facilitate these tasks and the mapping to clinical information system environments. Because of limitations in what can be done by a single team with finite resources, however, and the variety of additional perspectives that need to be accommodated, the InterMed team has determined that further development of a shared representation would be best served as an open process in which the world community is engaged. Under the auspices of the HL7 Decision Support Technical Committee, a GLIF Special Interest Group has been established, which is intended to be a forum for collaborative refinement and extension of a standard representation that can support the needs of the guideline lifecycle. Significant areas for future work will need to include demonstrations of effective means for incorporating guidelines at point of care, reconciliation of functional requirements of different models and identification of those most important for supporting practical implementation, improved means for authoring and management of complexity, and methods for automatically analyzing and validating syntax, semantics, and logical consistency of guidelines.

KW - Clinical practice guideline

KW - knowledge representation

KW - standards development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873064921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873064921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-201

DO - 10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-201

M3 - Conference contribution

C2 - 11604733

AN - SCOPUS:84873064921

SN - 1586031945

SN - 9781586031947

VL - 84

SP - 201

EP - 205

BT - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

ER -