Shakespeare and language: An introduction

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

TONGUE In ‘Shakespeare's talking animals’, Terence Hawkes makes a fundamental claim about language and Shakespeare's work. The plays, he says, contain ‘ideas about language’ which we neglect ‘because we are anaethetized to them by our own literacy’ (Hawkes: p. 69, this volume). Nothing could be more important in seeking to understand Early Modern ideas about language and use of language than becoming aware of our own narcotic unawareness of them. We are used to historicizing Shakespeare in every respect except his language, and, as Hawkes implies, our ignorance is matched only by our ignorance of our ignorance. But I would go further than Hawkes: as I will try to show in this introduction, there are not only ideas about language we miss; there are usages of language we misinterpret because we mistake the nature of language in the Early Modern period. From the point of view of linguistics, and taken as a product of human cognition, language can be assumed to be the same thing in all cultures, and at all times in attested human history. However, taken as a cultural entity, within literary or cultural criticism, language changes radically between the Early Modern period and our own – as radically as other cultural entities such as government, religion, and duty change. In the first part of this introduction, I will try to make language strange, to give an idea of its different cultural status in the Early Modern period; in the second, I will examine the curious reality our culture has bestowed on ‘wordes’, and what this does to our readings of Shakespeare.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationShakespeare and Language
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages1-17
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9780511617379
ISBN (Print)0521539005, 9780521831390
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

William Shakespeare
Language
Ignorance
Entity
Government
Religion
Animals
Neglect
Cognition
Cultural Criticism
Fundamental
Literacy
Mistakes
Human History
Unawareness
Literary Criticism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Hope, J. (2004). Shakespeare and language: An introduction. In Shakespeare and Language (pp. 1-17). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617379.002

Shakespeare and language : An introduction. / Hope, Jonathan.

Shakespeare and Language. Cambridge University Press, 2004. p. 1-17.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Hope, J 2004, Shakespeare and language: An introduction. in Shakespeare and Language. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617379.002
Hope J. Shakespeare and language: An introduction. In Shakespeare and Language. Cambridge University Press. 2004. p. 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617379.002
Hope, Jonathan. / Shakespeare and language : An introduction. Shakespeare and Language. Cambridge University Press, 2004. pp. 1-17
@inbook{52f3e2da441644bf8f6c6bdfe36fe692,
title = "Shakespeare and language: An introduction",
abstract = "TONGUE In ‘Shakespeare's talking animals’, Terence Hawkes makes a fundamental claim about language and Shakespeare's work. The plays, he says, contain ‘ideas about language’ which we neglect ‘because we are anaethetized to them by our own literacy’ (Hawkes: p. 69, this volume). Nothing could be more important in seeking to understand Early Modern ideas about language and use of language than becoming aware of our own narcotic unawareness of them. We are used to historicizing Shakespeare in every respect except his language, and, as Hawkes implies, our ignorance is matched only by our ignorance of our ignorance. But I would go further than Hawkes: as I will try to show in this introduction, there are not only ideas about language we miss; there are usages of language we misinterpret because we mistake the nature of language in the Early Modern period. From the point of view of linguistics, and taken as a product of human cognition, language can be assumed to be the same thing in all cultures, and at all times in attested human history. However, taken as a cultural entity, within literary or cultural criticism, language changes radically between the Early Modern period and our own – as radically as other cultural entities such as government, religion, and duty change. In the first part of this introduction, I will try to make language strange, to give an idea of its different cultural status in the Early Modern period; in the second, I will examine the curious reality our culture has bestowed on ‘wordes’, and what this does to our readings of Shakespeare.",
author = "Jonathan Hope",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511617379.002",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0521539005",
pages = "1--17",
booktitle = "Shakespeare and Language",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Shakespeare and language

T2 - An introduction

AU - Hope, Jonathan

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - TONGUE In ‘Shakespeare's talking animals’, Terence Hawkes makes a fundamental claim about language and Shakespeare's work. The plays, he says, contain ‘ideas about language’ which we neglect ‘because we are anaethetized to them by our own literacy’ (Hawkes: p. 69, this volume). Nothing could be more important in seeking to understand Early Modern ideas about language and use of language than becoming aware of our own narcotic unawareness of them. We are used to historicizing Shakespeare in every respect except his language, and, as Hawkes implies, our ignorance is matched only by our ignorance of our ignorance. But I would go further than Hawkes: as I will try to show in this introduction, there are not only ideas about language we miss; there are usages of language we misinterpret because we mistake the nature of language in the Early Modern period. From the point of view of linguistics, and taken as a product of human cognition, language can be assumed to be the same thing in all cultures, and at all times in attested human history. However, taken as a cultural entity, within literary or cultural criticism, language changes radically between the Early Modern period and our own – as radically as other cultural entities such as government, religion, and duty change. In the first part of this introduction, I will try to make language strange, to give an idea of its different cultural status in the Early Modern period; in the second, I will examine the curious reality our culture has bestowed on ‘wordes’, and what this does to our readings of Shakespeare.

AB - TONGUE In ‘Shakespeare's talking animals’, Terence Hawkes makes a fundamental claim about language and Shakespeare's work. The plays, he says, contain ‘ideas about language’ which we neglect ‘because we are anaethetized to them by our own literacy’ (Hawkes: p. 69, this volume). Nothing could be more important in seeking to understand Early Modern ideas about language and use of language than becoming aware of our own narcotic unawareness of them. We are used to historicizing Shakespeare in every respect except his language, and, as Hawkes implies, our ignorance is matched only by our ignorance of our ignorance. But I would go further than Hawkes: as I will try to show in this introduction, there are not only ideas about language we miss; there are usages of language we misinterpret because we mistake the nature of language in the Early Modern period. From the point of view of linguistics, and taken as a product of human cognition, language can be assumed to be the same thing in all cultures, and at all times in attested human history. However, taken as a cultural entity, within literary or cultural criticism, language changes radically between the Early Modern period and our own – as radically as other cultural entities such as government, religion, and duty change. In the first part of this introduction, I will try to make language strange, to give an idea of its different cultural status in the Early Modern period; in the second, I will examine the curious reality our culture has bestowed on ‘wordes’, and what this does to our readings of Shakespeare.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61949327100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61949327100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511617379.002

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511617379.002

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:61949327100

SN - 0521539005

SN - 9780521831390

SP - 1

EP - 17

BT - Shakespeare and Language

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -