TY - JOUR
T1 - Sexual selection in the Gulf Coast toad, Bufo valliceps
T2 - Female choice based on variable characters
AU - WAGNER,, WILLIAM E.
AU - Sullivan, Brian
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank J. Chavez, S. Gustavson and A. Mabry for assistance in the field during 1987, and R. Gill for access to the ponds on his property. A. L. Basolo, R. Cocroft, D. K. Hews, R. D. Howard, M. Kirkpatrick, M. R. Morris, M. J. Ryan, and two anonymous referees provided valuable criticism of the research and/or of the manuscript. The research was supported, in part, by a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research, the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund of the American Museum of Natural History and by NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant BSR-8700893 to W.E.W. Supplemental funding was provided through NSF grant BNS-8602698 to M. J. Ryan and W. Wilczynski. W.E.W. was supported during preparation of the manuscript by an NSF postdoctoral fellowship.
PY - 1995/2
Y1 - 1995/2
N2 - Sexual selection on male size and calling behaviour was studied for 2 years in one population and for 3 years in a second population of the Gulf Coast toad. A large-male mating advantage was detected only at one site during 1 year. Measures of calling behaviour were available for 3 years at one of the sites: on a nightly basis in 2 years, males with higher call rates were significantly more likely to mate than males with lower call rates. However, there was no relationship between mating success and either call duration or calling effort on a nightly bias in any year. In discrimination experiments, females preferred higher call rates and calls of longer duration, but not calls of lower frequency. Biased male mating success with respect to call rate therefore appears to have been partially a consequence of female mate choice. Call duration is positively correlated with male size, while dominant frequency is negatively correlated with male size in this species. Because females did not discriminate between high- and low-frequency calls, and because there was no bias in mating success with respect to call duration, it appears unlikely that female choice resulted in the large-male mating advantage observed in 1 year. Despite a nightly bias in mating success with respect to call rate that appears to have resulted from female mate choice, there was no detectable sexual selection on average call rate in any year. Instead, the number of nights of chorusing activity was the only detectable direct target of selection in all 3 years at one of the sites. The repeatability of call rate within males was low, ranging from 0·08 to 0·33. Simulations suggest that within-male variation in a trait can reduce the strength of sexual selection on the trait. Lack of selection on call rate, despite female choice based on call rate, may thus have been partially a consequence of within-male variation in this trait.
AB - Sexual selection on male size and calling behaviour was studied for 2 years in one population and for 3 years in a second population of the Gulf Coast toad. A large-male mating advantage was detected only at one site during 1 year. Measures of calling behaviour were available for 3 years at one of the sites: on a nightly basis in 2 years, males with higher call rates were significantly more likely to mate than males with lower call rates. However, there was no relationship between mating success and either call duration or calling effort on a nightly bias in any year. In discrimination experiments, females preferred higher call rates and calls of longer duration, but not calls of lower frequency. Biased male mating success with respect to call rate therefore appears to have been partially a consequence of female mate choice. Call duration is positively correlated with male size, while dominant frequency is negatively correlated with male size in this species. Because females did not discriminate between high- and low-frequency calls, and because there was no bias in mating success with respect to call duration, it appears unlikely that female choice resulted in the large-male mating advantage observed in 1 year. Despite a nightly bias in mating success with respect to call rate that appears to have resulted from female mate choice, there was no detectable sexual selection on average call rate in any year. Instead, the number of nights of chorusing activity was the only detectable direct target of selection in all 3 years at one of the sites. The repeatability of call rate within males was low, ranging from 0·08 to 0·33. Simulations suggest that within-male variation in a trait can reduce the strength of sexual selection on the trait. Lack of selection on call rate, despite female choice based on call rate, may thus have been partially a consequence of within-male variation in this trait.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028976964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028976964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/anbe.1995.0044
DO - 10.1006/anbe.1995.0044
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0028976964
VL - 49
SP - 305
EP - 319
JO - Animal Behaviour
JF - Animal Behaviour
SN - 0003-3472
IS - 2
ER -