TY - JOUR
T1 - Sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton)
T2 - An evaluation of two explanations for female aggression towards potential mates
AU - Johnson, J. Chadwick
N1 - Funding Information:
This work benefited greatly from comments and suggestions made by Andy Sih and Goran Arnqvist. I thank Andy Sih, Rob Ziemba,Tracie Ivy and two anonymous referees for reading and commenting on the manuscript. Members of the Sih laboratory and Center for Ecology, Evolution and Behavior at the University of Kentucky discussed and critiqued the study’s design, data analysis and interpretation on several occasions. I thank Sandra Deer, Jane Bishop, Jennifer Deer, Tracie Ivy, Gina Hupton and Penny for their love and moral support. Financial support was provided by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Training Fellowship, and the University of Kentucky’s Graduate School, School of Biological Sciences, and Center for Ecology, Evolution and Behavior.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - I manipulated food availability in juvenile and adult fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton) to test two hypotheses for sexual cannibalism. The adaptive foraging hypothesis posits that sexual cannibalism is an economic, adaptive foraging strategy on the part of the adult female. In contrast, the aggressive-spillover hypothesis suggests that precopulatory sexual cannibalism is misplaced aggression favoured in previous life-history phases. Several results indicated support for the adaptive foraging hypothesis. First, increased adult food availability produced marginally nonsignificant fecundity benefits in female's first egg sacs and highly significant fecundity benefits in female's second egg sacs. Second, while consumption of a male did not result in more offspring in either egg sac, it did significantly increase the probability a female would successfully hatch an egg sac. Finally, mating trials revealed mixed support for the adaptive foraging hypothesis as, for the most part, female mating behaviour (attack or mate) was not determined by the adaptive value a male represented (food item or sperm donor). Specifically, the likelihood of a precopulatory attack was not determined by male size, date (an indirect estimate of male availability) or female nutrient load. However, mated females did tend to attack courting males more often than virgin females. The aggressive-spillover hypothesis was supported by several findings. For juveniles, food availability had a significant positive effect on fixed female size (cephalothorax area at final moult) which, in turn, had a significant positive effect on fecundity. Thus, the spillover hypothesis' assertion that strong fecundity selection acts on juvenile feeding and fixed adult size was supported. The possibility that the spillover and adaptive foraging hypotheses are not mutually exclusive is discussed, especially in light of the presence of high levels of sexual cannibalism both before and after mating.
AB - I manipulated food availability in juvenile and adult fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton) to test two hypotheses for sexual cannibalism. The adaptive foraging hypothesis posits that sexual cannibalism is an economic, adaptive foraging strategy on the part of the adult female. In contrast, the aggressive-spillover hypothesis suggests that precopulatory sexual cannibalism is misplaced aggression favoured in previous life-history phases. Several results indicated support for the adaptive foraging hypothesis. First, increased adult food availability produced marginally nonsignificant fecundity benefits in female's first egg sacs and highly significant fecundity benefits in female's second egg sacs. Second, while consumption of a male did not result in more offspring in either egg sac, it did significantly increase the probability a female would successfully hatch an egg sac. Finally, mating trials revealed mixed support for the adaptive foraging hypothesis as, for the most part, female mating behaviour (attack or mate) was not determined by the adaptive value a male represented (food item or sperm donor). Specifically, the likelihood of a precopulatory attack was not determined by male size, date (an indirect estimate of male availability) or female nutrient load. However, mated females did tend to attack courting males more often than virgin females. The aggressive-spillover hypothesis was supported by several findings. For juveniles, food availability had a significant positive effect on fixed female size (cephalothorax area at final moult) which, in turn, had a significant positive effect on fecundity. Thus, the spillover hypothesis' assertion that strong fecundity selection acts on juvenile feeding and fixed adult size was supported. The possibility that the spillover and adaptive foraging hypotheses are not mutually exclusive is discussed, especially in light of the presence of high levels of sexual cannibalism both before and after mating.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034988015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034988015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/anbe.2000.1679
DO - 10.1006/anbe.2000.1679
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034988015
SN - 0003-3472
VL - 61
SP - 905
EP - 914
JO - Animal Behaviour
JF - Animal Behaviour
IS - 5
ER -