Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates

What, whether, and why

Norman P. Li, Douglas Kenrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

304 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Are there sex differences in criteria for sexual relationships? The answer depends on what question a researcher asks. Data suggest that, whereas the sexes differ in whether they will enter short-term sexual relationships, they are more similar in what they prioritize in partners for such relationships. However, additional data and context of other findings and theory suggest different underlying reasons. In Studies 1 and 2, men and women were given varying "mate budgets" to design short-term mates and were asked whether they would actually mate with constructed partners. Study 3 used a mate-screening paradigm. Whereas women have been found to prioritize status in long-term mates, they instead (like men) prioritize physical attractiveness much like an economic necessity in short-term mates. Both sexes also show evidence of favoring well-rounded long- and short-term mates when given the chance. In Studies 4 and 5, participants report reasons for having casual sex and what they find physically attractive. For women, results generally support a good genes account of short-term mating, as per strategic pluralism theory (S. W. Gangestad & J. A. Simpson, 2000). Discussion addresses broader theoretical implications for mate preference, and the link between method and theory in examining social decision processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)468-489
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume90
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Cultural Diversity
Budgets
social attraction
pluralism
budget
Economics
Research Personnel
paradigm
Genes
evidence
economics

Keywords

  • Economics
  • Mate selection
  • Short-term mating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates : What, whether, and why. / Li, Norman P.; Kenrick, Douglas.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 468-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b6f019b647e447483ba8074adc7fe4e,
title = "Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why",
abstract = "Are there sex differences in criteria for sexual relationships? The answer depends on what question a researcher asks. Data suggest that, whereas the sexes differ in whether they will enter short-term sexual relationships, they are more similar in what they prioritize in partners for such relationships. However, additional data and context of other findings and theory suggest different underlying reasons. In Studies 1 and 2, men and women were given varying {"}mate budgets{"} to design short-term mates and were asked whether they would actually mate with constructed partners. Study 3 used a mate-screening paradigm. Whereas women have been found to prioritize status in long-term mates, they instead (like men) prioritize physical attractiveness much like an economic necessity in short-term mates. Both sexes also show evidence of favoring well-rounded long- and short-term mates when given the chance. In Studies 4 and 5, participants report reasons for having casual sex and what they find physically attractive. For women, results generally support a good genes account of short-term mating, as per strategic pluralism theory (S. W. Gangestad & J. A. Simpson, 2000). Discussion addresses broader theoretical implications for mate preference, and the link between method and theory in examining social decision processes.",
keywords = "Economics, Mate selection, Short-term mating",
author = "Li, {Norman P.} and Douglas Kenrick",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "468--489",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates

T2 - What, whether, and why

AU - Li, Norman P.

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Are there sex differences in criteria for sexual relationships? The answer depends on what question a researcher asks. Data suggest that, whereas the sexes differ in whether they will enter short-term sexual relationships, they are more similar in what they prioritize in partners for such relationships. However, additional data and context of other findings and theory suggest different underlying reasons. In Studies 1 and 2, men and women were given varying "mate budgets" to design short-term mates and were asked whether they would actually mate with constructed partners. Study 3 used a mate-screening paradigm. Whereas women have been found to prioritize status in long-term mates, they instead (like men) prioritize physical attractiveness much like an economic necessity in short-term mates. Both sexes also show evidence of favoring well-rounded long- and short-term mates when given the chance. In Studies 4 and 5, participants report reasons for having casual sex and what they find physically attractive. For women, results generally support a good genes account of short-term mating, as per strategic pluralism theory (S. W. Gangestad & J. A. Simpson, 2000). Discussion addresses broader theoretical implications for mate preference, and the link between method and theory in examining social decision processes.

AB - Are there sex differences in criteria for sexual relationships? The answer depends on what question a researcher asks. Data suggest that, whereas the sexes differ in whether they will enter short-term sexual relationships, they are more similar in what they prioritize in partners for such relationships. However, additional data and context of other findings and theory suggest different underlying reasons. In Studies 1 and 2, men and women were given varying "mate budgets" to design short-term mates and were asked whether they would actually mate with constructed partners. Study 3 used a mate-screening paradigm. Whereas women have been found to prioritize status in long-term mates, they instead (like men) prioritize physical attractiveness much like an economic necessity in short-term mates. Both sexes also show evidence of favoring well-rounded long- and short-term mates when given the chance. In Studies 4 and 5, participants report reasons for having casual sex and what they find physically attractive. For women, results generally support a good genes account of short-term mating, as per strategic pluralism theory (S. W. Gangestad & J. A. Simpson, 2000). Discussion addresses broader theoretical implications for mate preference, and the link between method and theory in examining social decision processes.

KW - Economics

KW - Mate selection

KW - Short-term mating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745089580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745089580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 468

EP - 489

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -