Sex differences in empathy and related capacities

Nancy Eisenberg, Randy Lennon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 578 Citations

Abstract

Reviews the literature on sex differences in empathy (defined as vicarious affective responding to the emotional state of another) and related capacities (affective role taking and decoding of nonverbal cues). The literature is discussed according to method used to assess empathy and affective role taking. Where appropriate, meta-analyses were also computed. In general, sex differences in empathy were found to be a function of the methods used to assess empathy. There was a large sex difference favoring women when the measure of empathy was self-report scales; moderate differences (favoring females) were found for reflexive crying and self-report measures in laboratory situations; and no sex differences were evident when the measure of empathy was either physiological or unobtrusive observations of nonverbal reactions to another's emotional state. Moreover, few sex differences were found for children's affective role taking and decoding abilities. (156 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-131
Number of pages32
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1983

Fingerprint

Empathy
Sex Characteristics
Sex differences
Affective
Self Report
Self-report
Emotional state
Decoding
Crying
Cues
Meta-Analysis

Keywords

  • sex differences, empathy & affective role taking & decoding of nonverbal cues, literature review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. / Eisenberg, Nancy; Lennon, Randy.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 94, No. 1, 07.1983, p. 100-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eisenberg, Nancy; Lennon, Randy / Sex differences in empathy and related capacities.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 94, No. 1, 07.1983, p. 100-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c61a865da09841019319f93c62f70293,
title = "Sex differences in empathy and related capacities",
abstract = "Reviews the literature on sex differences in empathy (defined as vicarious affective responding to the emotional state of another) and related capacities (affective role taking and decoding of nonverbal cues). The literature is discussed according to method used to assess empathy and affective role taking. Where appropriate, meta-analyses were also computed. In general, sex differences in empathy were found to be a function of the methods used to assess empathy. There was a large sex difference favoring women when the measure of empathy was self-report scales; moderate differences (favoring females) were found for reflexive crying and self-report measures in laboratory situations; and no sex differences were evident when the measure of empathy was either physiological or unobtrusive observations of nonverbal reactions to another's emotional state. Moreover, few sex differences were found for children's affective role taking and decoding abilities. (156 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "sex differences, empathy & affective role taking & decoding of nonverbal cues, literature review",
author = "Nancy Eisenberg and Randy Lennon",
year = "1983",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100",
volume = "94",
pages = "100--131",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in empathy and related capacities

AU - Eisenberg,Nancy

AU - Lennon,Randy

PY - 1983/7

Y1 - 1983/7

N2 - Reviews the literature on sex differences in empathy (defined as vicarious affective responding to the emotional state of another) and related capacities (affective role taking and decoding of nonverbal cues). The literature is discussed according to method used to assess empathy and affective role taking. Where appropriate, meta-analyses were also computed. In general, sex differences in empathy were found to be a function of the methods used to assess empathy. There was a large sex difference favoring women when the measure of empathy was self-report scales; moderate differences (favoring females) were found for reflexive crying and self-report measures in laboratory situations; and no sex differences were evident when the measure of empathy was either physiological or unobtrusive observations of nonverbal reactions to another's emotional state. Moreover, few sex differences were found for children's affective role taking and decoding abilities. (156 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Reviews the literature on sex differences in empathy (defined as vicarious affective responding to the emotional state of another) and related capacities (affective role taking and decoding of nonverbal cues). The literature is discussed according to method used to assess empathy and affective role taking. Where appropriate, meta-analyses were also computed. In general, sex differences in empathy were found to be a function of the methods used to assess empathy. There was a large sex difference favoring women when the measure of empathy was self-report scales; moderate differences (favoring females) were found for reflexive crying and self-report measures in laboratory situations; and no sex differences were evident when the measure of empathy was either physiological or unobtrusive observations of nonverbal reactions to another's emotional state. Moreover, few sex differences were found for children's affective role taking and decoding abilities. (156 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - sex differences, empathy & affective role taking & decoding of nonverbal cues, literature review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002113803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002113803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100

DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 100

EP - 131

JO - Psychological Bulletin

T2 - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 1

ER -