Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy. The moderning influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity

Brad J. Sagarin, David Becker, Rosanna E. Guadagno, Lionel D. Nicastle, Allison Millevoi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past demonstrations of sex differences in jealousy have generally employed Buss et al.'s [Psychol. Sci. 3 (1992) 251] forced-choice methodology, a limitation criticized by DeSteno and Salovey Psychol. Sci. 7 (1996) 367]. The present studies address this criticism by demonstrating the sex difference using both forced-choice and continuous measures of jealousy. In addition, the results distinguish two important moderators of the sex difference: infidelity experience, in which male victims and female perpetrators of infidelity reported greater distress in response to a sexual infidelity, and sexual orientation of the infidelity, in which the sex difference disappears completely when infidelity carries no risk of conception because an opposite-sex partner has become involved with a same-sex lover.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-23
Number of pages7
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2003

Fingerprint

Jealousy
jealousy
sexual orientation
gender differences
Sex Characteristics
Sexual Behavior
methodology
moderator
experience
criticism
gender
distress
Sexual Orientation
Sex Differences

Keywords

  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Jealousy
  • Sex differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Development

Cite this

Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy. The moderning influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity. / Sagarin, Brad J.; Becker, David; Guadagno, Rosanna E.; Nicastle, Lionel D.; Millevoi, Allison.

In: Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 17-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sagarin, Brad J. ; Becker, David ; Guadagno, Rosanna E. ; Nicastle, Lionel D. ; Millevoi, Allison. / Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy. The moderning influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity. In: Evolution and Human Behavior. 2003 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 17-23.
@article{55ae66e5697e4418ac5caa3491073028,
title = "Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy. The moderning influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity",
abstract = "Past demonstrations of sex differences in jealousy have generally employed Buss et al.'s [Psychol. Sci. 3 (1992) 251] forced-choice methodology, a limitation criticized by DeSteno and Salovey Psychol. Sci. 7 (1996) 367]. The present studies address this criticism by demonstrating the sex difference using both forced-choice and continuous measures of jealousy. In addition, the results distinguish two important moderators of the sex difference: infidelity experience, in which male victims and female perpetrators of infidelity reported greater distress in response to a sexual infidelity, and sexual orientation of the infidelity, in which the sex difference disappears completely when infidelity carries no risk of conception because an opposite-sex partner has become involved with a same-sex lover.",
keywords = "Evolutionary psychology, Jealousy, Sex differences",
author = "Sagarin, {Brad J.} and David Becker and Guadagno, {Rosanna E.} and Nicastle, {Lionel D.} and Allison Millevoi",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00106-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "17--23",
journal = "Evolution and Human Behavior",
issn = "1090-5138",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy. The moderning influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity

AU - Sagarin, Brad J.

AU - Becker, David

AU - Guadagno, Rosanna E.

AU - Nicastle, Lionel D.

AU - Millevoi, Allison

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - Past demonstrations of sex differences in jealousy have generally employed Buss et al.'s [Psychol. Sci. 3 (1992) 251] forced-choice methodology, a limitation criticized by DeSteno and Salovey Psychol. Sci. 7 (1996) 367]. The present studies address this criticism by demonstrating the sex difference using both forced-choice and continuous measures of jealousy. In addition, the results distinguish two important moderators of the sex difference: infidelity experience, in which male victims and female perpetrators of infidelity reported greater distress in response to a sexual infidelity, and sexual orientation of the infidelity, in which the sex difference disappears completely when infidelity carries no risk of conception because an opposite-sex partner has become involved with a same-sex lover.

AB - Past demonstrations of sex differences in jealousy have generally employed Buss et al.'s [Psychol. Sci. 3 (1992) 251] forced-choice methodology, a limitation criticized by DeSteno and Salovey Psychol. Sci. 7 (1996) 367]. The present studies address this criticism by demonstrating the sex difference using both forced-choice and continuous measures of jealousy. In addition, the results distinguish two important moderators of the sex difference: infidelity experience, in which male victims and female perpetrators of infidelity reported greater distress in response to a sexual infidelity, and sexual orientation of the infidelity, in which the sex difference disappears completely when infidelity carries no risk of conception because an opposite-sex partner has become involved with a same-sex lover.

KW - Evolutionary psychology

KW - Jealousy

KW - Sex differences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037212652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037212652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00106-X

DO - 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00106-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037212652

VL - 24

SP - 17

EP - 23

JO - Evolution and Human Behavior

JF - Evolution and Human Behavior

SN - 1090-5138

IS - 1

ER -