Setting thresholds for quality indicators derived from MDS data for nursing home quality improvement reports

an update.

M. J. Rantz, G. F. Petroski, R. W. Madsen, D. R. Mehr, L. Popejoy, L. L. Hicks, R. Porter, M. Zwygart-Stauffacher, V. Grando

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining meaningful thresholds to reinforce excellent performance and flag potential problem areas in nursing home care is critical for preparing reports for nursing homes to use in their quality improvement programs. This article builds on the work of an earlier panel of experts that set thresholds for quality indicators (QIs) derived from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data. Thresholds were now set for the revised MDS 2.0 two-page quarterly form and Resource Utilization Groups III (RUGS III) quarterly instrument. SETTING THRESHOLDS: In a day-long session in October 1998, panel members individually determined lower (good) and upper (poor) threshold scores for each QI, reviewed statewide distributions of MDS QIs, and completed a follow-up Delphi of the final results. REPORTING MDS QIS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: The QI reports compiled longitudinal data for all residents in the nursing home during each quarter and cumulatively displayed data for five quarters for each QI. A resident roster was provided to the nursing home so that the quality improvement team could identify the specific residents who developed the problems defined by each QI during the last quarter. Quality improvement teams found the reports helpful and easy to interpret. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: As promised in an earlier report, to ensure that thresholds reflect current practice, research using experts in a panel to set thresholds was repeated as needed. As the MDS instrument or recommended calculations for the MDS QIs change, thresholds will be reestablished to ensure a fit with the instrument and data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-110
Number of pages10
JournalThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
Volume26
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Nursing Homes
Home Care Services
Nursing Care
Datasets
Research

Cite this

Rantz, M. J., Petroski, G. F., Madsen, R. W., Mehr, D. R., Popejoy, L., Hicks, L. L., ... Grando, V. (2000). Setting thresholds for quality indicators derived from MDS data for nursing home quality improvement reports: an update. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 26(2), 101-110.

Setting thresholds for quality indicators derived from MDS data for nursing home quality improvement reports : an update. / Rantz, M. J.; Petroski, G. F.; Madsen, R. W.; Mehr, D. R.; Popejoy, L.; Hicks, L. L.; Porter, R.; Zwygart-Stauffacher, M.; Grando, V.

In: The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2000, p. 101-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rantz, MJ, Petroski, GF, Madsen, RW, Mehr, DR, Popejoy, L, Hicks, LL, Porter, R, Zwygart-Stauffacher, M & Grando, V 2000, 'Setting thresholds for quality indicators derived from MDS data for nursing home quality improvement reports: an update.', The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 101-110.
Rantz, M. J. ; Petroski, G. F. ; Madsen, R. W. ; Mehr, D. R. ; Popejoy, L. ; Hicks, L. L. ; Porter, R. ; Zwygart-Stauffacher, M. ; Grando, V. / Setting thresholds for quality indicators derived from MDS data for nursing home quality improvement reports : an update. In: The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 2000 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 101-110.
@article{f55a7a0f2c784c468aa4c47876ab1565,
title = "Setting thresholds for quality indicators derived from MDS data for nursing home quality improvement reports: an update.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Determining meaningful thresholds to reinforce excellent performance and flag potential problem areas in nursing home care is critical for preparing reports for nursing homes to use in their quality improvement programs. This article builds on the work of an earlier panel of experts that set thresholds for quality indicators (QIs) derived from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data. Thresholds were now set for the revised MDS 2.0 two-page quarterly form and Resource Utilization Groups III (RUGS III) quarterly instrument. SETTING THRESHOLDS: In a day-long session in October 1998, panel members individually determined lower (good) and upper (poor) threshold scores for each QI, reviewed statewide distributions of MDS QIs, and completed a follow-up Delphi of the final results. REPORTING MDS QIS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: The QI reports compiled longitudinal data for all residents in the nursing home during each quarter and cumulatively displayed data for five quarters for each QI. A resident roster was provided to the nursing home so that the quality improvement team could identify the specific residents who developed the problems defined by each QI during the last quarter. Quality improvement teams found the reports helpful and easy to interpret. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: As promised in an earlier report, to ensure that thresholds reflect current practice, research using experts in a panel to set thresholds was repeated as needed. As the MDS instrument or recommended calculations for the MDS QIs change, thresholds will be reestablished to ensure a fit with the instrument and data.",
author = "Rantz, {M. J.} and Petroski, {G. F.} and Madsen, {R. W.} and Mehr, {D. R.} and L. Popejoy and Hicks, {L. L.} and R. Porter and M. Zwygart-Stauffacher and V. Grando",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "101--110",
journal = "Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety",
issn = "1553-7250",
publisher = "Joint Commission Resources, Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting thresholds for quality indicators derived from MDS data for nursing home quality improvement reports

T2 - an update.

AU - Rantz, M. J.

AU - Petroski, G. F.

AU - Madsen, R. W.

AU - Mehr, D. R.

AU - Popejoy, L.

AU - Hicks, L. L.

AU - Porter, R.

AU - Zwygart-Stauffacher, M.

AU - Grando, V.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - BACKGROUND: Determining meaningful thresholds to reinforce excellent performance and flag potential problem areas in nursing home care is critical for preparing reports for nursing homes to use in their quality improvement programs. This article builds on the work of an earlier panel of experts that set thresholds for quality indicators (QIs) derived from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data. Thresholds were now set for the revised MDS 2.0 two-page quarterly form and Resource Utilization Groups III (RUGS III) quarterly instrument. SETTING THRESHOLDS: In a day-long session in October 1998, panel members individually determined lower (good) and upper (poor) threshold scores for each QI, reviewed statewide distributions of MDS QIs, and completed a follow-up Delphi of the final results. REPORTING MDS QIS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: The QI reports compiled longitudinal data for all residents in the nursing home during each quarter and cumulatively displayed data for five quarters for each QI. A resident roster was provided to the nursing home so that the quality improvement team could identify the specific residents who developed the problems defined by each QI during the last quarter. Quality improvement teams found the reports helpful and easy to interpret. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: As promised in an earlier report, to ensure that thresholds reflect current practice, research using experts in a panel to set thresholds was repeated as needed. As the MDS instrument or recommended calculations for the MDS QIs change, thresholds will be reestablished to ensure a fit with the instrument and data.

AB - BACKGROUND: Determining meaningful thresholds to reinforce excellent performance and flag potential problem areas in nursing home care is critical for preparing reports for nursing homes to use in their quality improvement programs. This article builds on the work of an earlier panel of experts that set thresholds for quality indicators (QIs) derived from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data. Thresholds were now set for the revised MDS 2.0 two-page quarterly form and Resource Utilization Groups III (RUGS III) quarterly instrument. SETTING THRESHOLDS: In a day-long session in October 1998, panel members individually determined lower (good) and upper (poor) threshold scores for each QI, reviewed statewide distributions of MDS QIs, and completed a follow-up Delphi of the final results. REPORTING MDS QIS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: The QI reports compiled longitudinal data for all residents in the nursing home during each quarter and cumulatively displayed data for five quarters for each QI. A resident roster was provided to the nursing home so that the quality improvement team could identify the specific residents who developed the problems defined by each QI during the last quarter. Quality improvement teams found the reports helpful and easy to interpret. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: As promised in an earlier report, to ensure that thresholds reflect current practice, research using experts in a panel to set thresholds was repeated as needed. As the MDS instrument or recommended calculations for the MDS QIs change, thresholds will be reestablished to ensure a fit with the instrument and data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034133496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034133496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 101

EP - 110

JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

SN - 1553-7250

IS - 2

ER -