Setting thresholds for MDS (Minimum Data Set) quality indicators for nursing home quality improvement reports.

M. J. Rantz, G. F. Petroski, R. W. Madsen, J. Scott, D. R. Mehr, L. Popejoy, L. L. Hicks, R. Porter, M. Zwygart-Stauffacher, V. Grando

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining meaningful thresholds to reinforce excellent performance and flag potential problem areas is critical for quality improvement reports. Without thresholds, an organization may interpret its performance as superior to others because it is "better than average" and falsely assume it does not have care problems in certain areas. SETTING THRESHOLDS: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment instrument is mandated for use nationwide in all nursing homes participating in Medicaid or Medicare programs. Since 1993 a research team at the University of Missouri-Columbia has been developing and testing quality indicators (QIs) derived from MDS data as a foundation for quality improvement activities. In July 1996, a cross-section of 13 clinical care personnel from nursing homes participated on an expert panel for threshold setting for QIs derived from MDS assessment data. Panel members individually determined good and poor threshold scores for each QI, reviewed statewide distributions of MDS QIs, and, two weeks later, completed a follow-up Delphi round. Three members of the research team reviewed the results of the expert panel and set the final thresholds. With thresholds established for good and poor scores, MDS QI scores are reported to a sample of Missouri nursing homes using the thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure that thresholds reflect current practice, threshold setting with another panel of experts will be repeated as needed, but at least biannually. The report format will be revised on the basis of user input, and a statewide study testing different educational support methods for quality improvement using MDS QIs is now underway.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)602-611
Number of pages10
JournalThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
Volume23
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Nursing Homes
Medicaid
Medicare
Research
Datasets
Data Accuracy
Organizations

Cite this

Rantz, M. J., Petroski, G. F., Madsen, R. W., Scott, J., Mehr, D. R., Popejoy, L., ... Grando, V. (1997). Setting thresholds for MDS (Minimum Data Set) quality indicators for nursing home quality improvement reports. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 23(11), 602-611.

Setting thresholds for MDS (Minimum Data Set) quality indicators for nursing home quality improvement reports. / Rantz, M. J.; Petroski, G. F.; Madsen, R. W.; Scott, J.; Mehr, D. R.; Popejoy, L.; Hicks, L. L.; Porter, R.; Zwygart-Stauffacher, M.; Grando, V.

In: The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, Vol. 23, No. 11, 1997, p. 602-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rantz, MJ, Petroski, GF, Madsen, RW, Scott, J, Mehr, DR, Popejoy, L, Hicks, LL, Porter, R, Zwygart-Stauffacher, M & Grando, V 1997, 'Setting thresholds for MDS (Minimum Data Set) quality indicators for nursing home quality improvement reports.', The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 602-611.
Rantz, M. J. ; Petroski, G. F. ; Madsen, R. W. ; Scott, J. ; Mehr, D. R. ; Popejoy, L. ; Hicks, L. L. ; Porter, R. ; Zwygart-Stauffacher, M. ; Grando, V. / Setting thresholds for MDS (Minimum Data Set) quality indicators for nursing home quality improvement reports. In: The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 1997 ; Vol. 23, No. 11. pp. 602-611.
@article{d8714274c15247e4968c157bcd1dcff9,
title = "Setting thresholds for MDS (Minimum Data Set) quality indicators for nursing home quality improvement reports.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Determining meaningful thresholds to reinforce excellent performance and flag potential problem areas is critical for quality improvement reports. Without thresholds, an organization may interpret its performance as superior to others because it is {"}better than average{"} and falsely assume it does not have care problems in certain areas. SETTING THRESHOLDS: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment instrument is mandated for use nationwide in all nursing homes participating in Medicaid or Medicare programs. Since 1993 a research team at the University of Missouri-Columbia has been developing and testing quality indicators (QIs) derived from MDS data as a foundation for quality improvement activities. In July 1996, a cross-section of 13 clinical care personnel from nursing homes participated on an expert panel for threshold setting for QIs derived from MDS assessment data. Panel members individually determined good and poor threshold scores for each QI, reviewed statewide distributions of MDS QIs, and, two weeks later, completed a follow-up Delphi round. Three members of the research team reviewed the results of the expert panel and set the final thresholds. With thresholds established for good and poor scores, MDS QI scores are reported to a sample of Missouri nursing homes using the thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure that thresholds reflect current practice, threshold setting with another panel of experts will be repeated as needed, but at least biannually. The report format will be revised on the basis of user input, and a statewide study testing different educational support methods for quality improvement using MDS QIs is now underway.",
author = "Rantz, {M. J.} and Petroski, {G. F.} and Madsen, {R. W.} and J. Scott and Mehr, {D. R.} and L. Popejoy and Hicks, {L. L.} and R. Porter and M. Zwygart-Stauffacher and V. Grando",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "602--611",
journal = "Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety",
issn = "1553-7250",
publisher = "Joint Commission Resources, Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting thresholds for MDS (Minimum Data Set) quality indicators for nursing home quality improvement reports.

AU - Rantz, M. J.

AU - Petroski, G. F.

AU - Madsen, R. W.

AU - Scott, J.

AU - Mehr, D. R.

AU - Popejoy, L.

AU - Hicks, L. L.

AU - Porter, R.

AU - Zwygart-Stauffacher, M.

AU - Grando, V.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - BACKGROUND: Determining meaningful thresholds to reinforce excellent performance and flag potential problem areas is critical for quality improvement reports. Without thresholds, an organization may interpret its performance as superior to others because it is "better than average" and falsely assume it does not have care problems in certain areas. SETTING THRESHOLDS: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment instrument is mandated for use nationwide in all nursing homes participating in Medicaid or Medicare programs. Since 1993 a research team at the University of Missouri-Columbia has been developing and testing quality indicators (QIs) derived from MDS data as a foundation for quality improvement activities. In July 1996, a cross-section of 13 clinical care personnel from nursing homes participated on an expert panel for threshold setting for QIs derived from MDS assessment data. Panel members individually determined good and poor threshold scores for each QI, reviewed statewide distributions of MDS QIs, and, two weeks later, completed a follow-up Delphi round. Three members of the research team reviewed the results of the expert panel and set the final thresholds. With thresholds established for good and poor scores, MDS QI scores are reported to a sample of Missouri nursing homes using the thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure that thresholds reflect current practice, threshold setting with another panel of experts will be repeated as needed, but at least biannually. The report format will be revised on the basis of user input, and a statewide study testing different educational support methods for quality improvement using MDS QIs is now underway.

AB - BACKGROUND: Determining meaningful thresholds to reinforce excellent performance and flag potential problem areas is critical for quality improvement reports. Without thresholds, an organization may interpret its performance as superior to others because it is "better than average" and falsely assume it does not have care problems in certain areas. SETTING THRESHOLDS: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment instrument is mandated for use nationwide in all nursing homes participating in Medicaid or Medicare programs. Since 1993 a research team at the University of Missouri-Columbia has been developing and testing quality indicators (QIs) derived from MDS data as a foundation for quality improvement activities. In July 1996, a cross-section of 13 clinical care personnel from nursing homes participated on an expert panel for threshold setting for QIs derived from MDS assessment data. Panel members individually determined good and poor threshold scores for each QI, reviewed statewide distributions of MDS QIs, and, two weeks later, completed a follow-up Delphi round. Three members of the research team reviewed the results of the expert panel and set the final thresholds. With thresholds established for good and poor scores, MDS QI scores are reported to a sample of Missouri nursing homes using the thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure that thresholds reflect current practice, threshold setting with another panel of experts will be repeated as needed, but at least biannually. The report format will be revised on the basis of user input, and a statewide study testing different educational support methods for quality improvement using MDS QIs is now underway.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031266156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031266156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9407264

AN - SCOPUS:0031266156

VL - 23

SP - 602

EP - 611

JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

SN - 1553-7250

IS - 11

ER -