Service quality variation across urban space: First steps toward a model of citizen satisfaction

Janet M. Kelly, David Swindell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is currently a strong focus on alternative service delivery models and improved government service in the urban and public administration fields. A key aspect of this has been the institutionalization of performance measurement and benchmarking as core tools necessary to reinvent government and make agencies run like businesses. However, the focus on performance measurement has been limited to evaluations of inputs and outputs. Advocates have not successfully tackled the more difficult challenge of integrating good internal measures with service outcomes, which can best be measured by soliciting feedback from the customer through citizen surveys. In this article, we examine 96 neighborhoods across 12 cities and counties and find significant variation in the distribution of service satisfaction outcomes. We argue that such neighborhood-level feedback is useful and illustrates the importance to administrators of disaggregating traditional performance measures to the same neighborhood level to target scare resources more effectively where needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-288
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Urban Affairs
Volume24
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

citizen
performance measurement
public administration
benchmarking
institutionalization
customer
service quality
services
resource
evaluation
resources
performance
distribution
institutionalisation
county
city

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Service quality variation across urban space : First steps toward a model of citizen satisfaction. / Kelly, Janet M.; Swindell, David.

In: Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2002, p. 271-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3958d49737e4480593c46e98023ae762,
title = "Service quality variation across urban space: First steps toward a model of citizen satisfaction",
abstract = "There is currently a strong focus on alternative service delivery models and improved government service in the urban and public administration fields. A key aspect of this has been the institutionalization of performance measurement and benchmarking as core tools necessary to reinvent government and make agencies run like businesses. However, the focus on performance measurement has been limited to evaluations of inputs and outputs. Advocates have not successfully tackled the more difficult challenge of integrating good internal measures with service outcomes, which can best be measured by soliciting feedback from the customer through citizen surveys. In this article, we examine 96 neighborhoods across 12 cities and counties and find significant variation in the distribution of service satisfaction outcomes. We argue that such neighborhood-level feedback is useful and illustrates the importance to administrators of disaggregating traditional performance measures to the same neighborhood level to target scare resources more effectively where needed.",
author = "Kelly, {Janet M.} and David Swindell",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "271--288",
journal = "Journal of Urban Affairs",
issn = "0735-2166",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Service quality variation across urban space

T2 - First steps toward a model of citizen satisfaction

AU - Kelly, Janet M.

AU - Swindell, David

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - There is currently a strong focus on alternative service delivery models and improved government service in the urban and public administration fields. A key aspect of this has been the institutionalization of performance measurement and benchmarking as core tools necessary to reinvent government and make agencies run like businesses. However, the focus on performance measurement has been limited to evaluations of inputs and outputs. Advocates have not successfully tackled the more difficult challenge of integrating good internal measures with service outcomes, which can best be measured by soliciting feedback from the customer through citizen surveys. In this article, we examine 96 neighborhoods across 12 cities and counties and find significant variation in the distribution of service satisfaction outcomes. We argue that such neighborhood-level feedback is useful and illustrates the importance to administrators of disaggregating traditional performance measures to the same neighborhood level to target scare resources more effectively where needed.

AB - There is currently a strong focus on alternative service delivery models and improved government service in the urban and public administration fields. A key aspect of this has been the institutionalization of performance measurement and benchmarking as core tools necessary to reinvent government and make agencies run like businesses. However, the focus on performance measurement has been limited to evaluations of inputs and outputs. Advocates have not successfully tackled the more difficult challenge of integrating good internal measures with service outcomes, which can best be measured by soliciting feedback from the customer through citizen surveys. In this article, we examine 96 neighborhoods across 12 cities and counties and find significant variation in the distribution of service satisfaction outcomes. We argue that such neighborhood-level feedback is useful and illustrates the importance to administrators of disaggregating traditional performance measures to the same neighborhood level to target scare resources more effectively where needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036023167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036023167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036023167

VL - 24

SP - 271

EP - 288

JO - Journal of Urban Affairs

JF - Journal of Urban Affairs

SN - 0735-2166

IS - 3

ER -