Separating macroecological pattern and process

Comparing ecological, economic, and geological systems

Benjamin Blonder, Lindsey Sloat, Brian J. Enquist, Brian McGill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theories of biodiversity rest on several macroecological patterns describing the relationship between species abundance and diversity. A central problem is that all theories make similar predictions for these patterns despite disparate assumptions. A troubling implication is that these patterns may not reflect anything unique about organizational principles of biology or the functioning of ecological systems. To test this, we analyze five datasets from ecological, economic, and geological systems that describe the distribution of objects across categories in the United States. At the level of functional form ('first-order effects'), these patterns are not unique to ecological systems, indicating they may reveal little about biological process. However, we show that mechanism can be better revealed in the scale-dependency of first-order patterns ('second-order effects'). These results provide a roadmap for biodiversity theory to move beyond traditional patterns, and also suggest ways in which macroecological theory can constrain the dynamics of economic systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere112850
JournalPLoS One
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 10 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ecological economics
Biodiversity
Ecosystem
Economics
biodiversity
Biological Phenomena
economic systems
Biological Sciences
prediction
testing
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Separating macroecological pattern and process : Comparing ecological, economic, and geological systems. / Blonder, Benjamin; Sloat, Lindsey; Enquist, Brian J.; McGill, Brian.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 9, No. 11, e112850, 10.11.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blonder, Benjamin ; Sloat, Lindsey ; Enquist, Brian J. ; McGill, Brian. / Separating macroecological pattern and process : Comparing ecological, economic, and geological systems. In: PLoS One. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 11.
@article{93dbdc1e0ebd47f39c3f44b5e21c7779,
title = "Separating macroecological pattern and process: Comparing ecological, economic, and geological systems",
abstract = "Theories of biodiversity rest on several macroecological patterns describing the relationship between species abundance and diversity. A central problem is that all theories make similar predictions for these patterns despite disparate assumptions. A troubling implication is that these patterns may not reflect anything unique about organizational principles of biology or the functioning of ecological systems. To test this, we analyze five datasets from ecological, economic, and geological systems that describe the distribution of objects across categories in the United States. At the level of functional form ('first-order effects'), these patterns are not unique to ecological systems, indicating they may reveal little about biological process. However, we show that mechanism can be better revealed in the scale-dependency of first-order patterns ('second-order effects'). These results provide a roadmap for biodiversity theory to move beyond traditional patterns, and also suggest ways in which macroecological theory can constrain the dynamics of economic systems.",
author = "Benjamin Blonder and Lindsey Sloat and Enquist, {Brian J.} and Brian McGill",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0112850",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Separating macroecological pattern and process

T2 - Comparing ecological, economic, and geological systems

AU - Blonder, Benjamin

AU - Sloat, Lindsey

AU - Enquist, Brian J.

AU - McGill, Brian

PY - 2014/11/10

Y1 - 2014/11/10

N2 - Theories of biodiversity rest on several macroecological patterns describing the relationship between species abundance and diversity. A central problem is that all theories make similar predictions for these patterns despite disparate assumptions. A troubling implication is that these patterns may not reflect anything unique about organizational principles of biology or the functioning of ecological systems. To test this, we analyze five datasets from ecological, economic, and geological systems that describe the distribution of objects across categories in the United States. At the level of functional form ('first-order effects'), these patterns are not unique to ecological systems, indicating they may reveal little about biological process. However, we show that mechanism can be better revealed in the scale-dependency of first-order patterns ('second-order effects'). These results provide a roadmap for biodiversity theory to move beyond traditional patterns, and also suggest ways in which macroecological theory can constrain the dynamics of economic systems.

AB - Theories of biodiversity rest on several macroecological patterns describing the relationship between species abundance and diversity. A central problem is that all theories make similar predictions for these patterns despite disparate assumptions. A troubling implication is that these patterns may not reflect anything unique about organizational principles of biology or the functioning of ecological systems. To test this, we analyze five datasets from ecological, economic, and geological systems that describe the distribution of objects across categories in the United States. At the level of functional form ('first-order effects'), these patterns are not unique to ecological systems, indicating they may reveal little about biological process. However, we show that mechanism can be better revealed in the scale-dependency of first-order patterns ('second-order effects'). These results provide a roadmap for biodiversity theory to move beyond traditional patterns, and also suggest ways in which macroecological theory can constrain the dynamics of economic systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911390859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911390859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0112850

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0112850

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 11

M1 - e112850

ER -