Sentencing: The Influence of Alternative Measures of Prior Record

SUSAN WELCH, JOHN GRUHL, Cassia Spohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While there is nearly unanimous agreement among social scientists that the defendant's prior record is important in explaining the sentence imposed on the defendant, there is little agreement on the “best” or most appropriate measure of prior record to use in examining sentence disparity. This study provides an assessment of the utility of 11 commonly used measures of prior record. We find that the various measures are not interrelated highly and thus necessarily are not interchangeable. We also find that the measures of prior record affect sentence severity differently and that the relationships between these measures and sentence severity varies for black and white defendants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-227
Number of pages13
JournalCriminology
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social scientist
hydroquinone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Sentencing : The Influence of Alternative Measures of Prior Record. / WELCH, SUSAN; GRUHL, JOHN; Spohn, Cassia.

In: Criminology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1984, p. 215-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

WELCH, SUSAN ; GRUHL, JOHN ; Spohn, Cassia. / Sentencing : The Influence of Alternative Measures of Prior Record. In: Criminology. 1984 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 215-227.
@article{7d8e9fa9f0534033a63b911af78ea564,
title = "Sentencing: The Influence of Alternative Measures of Prior Record",
abstract = "While there is nearly unanimous agreement among social scientists that the defendant's prior record is important in explaining the sentence imposed on the defendant, there is little agreement on the “best” or most appropriate measure of prior record to use in examining sentence disparity. This study provides an assessment of the utility of 11 commonly used measures of prior record. We find that the various measures are not interrelated highly and thus necessarily are not interchangeable. We also find that the measures of prior record affect sentence severity differently and that the relationships between these measures and sentence severity varies for black and white defendants.",
author = "SUSAN WELCH and JOHN GRUHL and Cassia Spohn",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00298.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "215--227",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sentencing

T2 - The Influence of Alternative Measures of Prior Record

AU - WELCH, SUSAN

AU - GRUHL, JOHN

AU - Spohn, Cassia

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - While there is nearly unanimous agreement among social scientists that the defendant's prior record is important in explaining the sentence imposed on the defendant, there is little agreement on the “best” or most appropriate measure of prior record to use in examining sentence disparity. This study provides an assessment of the utility of 11 commonly used measures of prior record. We find that the various measures are not interrelated highly and thus necessarily are not interchangeable. We also find that the measures of prior record affect sentence severity differently and that the relationships between these measures and sentence severity varies for black and white defendants.

AB - While there is nearly unanimous agreement among social scientists that the defendant's prior record is important in explaining the sentence imposed on the defendant, there is little agreement on the “best” or most appropriate measure of prior record to use in examining sentence disparity. This study provides an assessment of the utility of 11 commonly used measures of prior record. We find that the various measures are not interrelated highly and thus necessarily are not interchangeable. We also find that the measures of prior record affect sentence severity differently and that the relationships between these measures and sentence severity varies for black and white defendants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984332308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984332308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00298.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00298.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84984332308

VL - 22

SP - 215

EP - 227

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 2

ER -