Sensitivity of simulated CO2 concentration to regridding of global fossil fuel CO2 emissions

X. Zhang, Kevin Gurney, P. Rayner, Y. Liu, S. Asefi-Najafabady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Errors in the specification or utilization of fossil fuel CO2 emissions within carbon budget or atmospheric CO2 inverse studies can alias the estimation of biospheric and oceanic carbon exchange. A key component in the simulation of CO2 concentrations arising from fossil fuel emissions is the spatial distribution of the emission near coastlines. Regridding of fossil fuel CO2 emissions (FFCO2) from fine to coarse grids to enable atmospheric transport simulations can give rise to mismatches between the emissions and simulated atmospheric dynamics which differ over land or water. For example, emissions originally emanating from the land are emitted from a grid cell for which the vertical mixing reflects the roughness and/or surface energy exchange of an ocean surface. We test this potential "dynamical inconsistency" by examining simulated global atmospheric CO2 concentration driven by two different approaches to regridding fossil fuel CO2 emissions. The two approaches are as follows: (1) a commonly used method that allocates emissions to grid cells with no attempt to ensure dynamical consistency with atmospheric transport and (2) an improved method that reallocates emissions to grid cells to ensure dynamically consistent results. Results show large spatial and temporal differences in the simulated CO2 concentration when comparing these two approaches. The emissions difference ranges from '30.3 TgC grid cell'1 yr'1 ('3.39 kgC m'2 yr'1) to +30.0 TgC grid cell'1 yr'1 (+2.6 kgC m'2 yr'1) along coastal margins. Maximum simulated annual mean CO2 concentration differences at the surface exceed ±6 ppm at various locations and times. Examination of the current CO2 monitoring locations during the local afternoon, consistent with inversion modeling system sampling and measurement protocols, finds maximum hourly differences at 38 stations exceed ±0.10 ppm with individual station differences exceeding '32 ppm. The differences implied by not accounting for this dynamical consistency problem are largest at monitoring sites proximal to large coastal urban areas and point sources. These results suggest that studies comparing simulated to observed atmospheric CO2 concentration, such as atmospheric CO2 inversions, must take measures to correct for this potential problem and ensure flux and dynamical consistency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2867-2874
Number of pages8
JournalGeoscientific Model Development
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 4 2014

Fingerprint

Fossil fuels
fossil fuel
Biospherics
Grid
Carbon
Monitoring
Cell
Interfacial energy
Spatial distribution
atmospheric transport
Surface roughness
Fluxes
Sampling
Specifications
Inversion
Exceed
Afternoon
atmospheric dynamics
Potential Problems
carbon budget

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Sensitivity of simulated CO2 concentration to regridding of global fossil fuel CO2 emissions. / Zhang, X.; Gurney, Kevin; Rayner, P.; Liu, Y.; Asefi-Najafabady, S.

In: Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 7, No. 6, 04.12.2014, p. 2867-2874.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhang, X. ; Gurney, Kevin ; Rayner, P. ; Liu, Y. ; Asefi-Najafabady, S. / Sensitivity of simulated CO2 concentration to regridding of global fossil fuel CO2 emissions. In: Geoscientific Model Development. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 6. pp. 2867-2874.
@article{08fcafe11faa414b9073c977289614f7,
title = "Sensitivity of simulated CO2 concentration to regridding of global fossil fuel CO2 emissions",
abstract = "Errors in the specification or utilization of fossil fuel CO2 emissions within carbon budget or atmospheric CO2 inverse studies can alias the estimation of biospheric and oceanic carbon exchange. A key component in the simulation of CO2 concentrations arising from fossil fuel emissions is the spatial distribution of the emission near coastlines. Regridding of fossil fuel CO2 emissions (FFCO2) from fine to coarse grids to enable atmospheric transport simulations can give rise to mismatches between the emissions and simulated atmospheric dynamics which differ over land or water. For example, emissions originally emanating from the land are emitted from a grid cell for which the vertical mixing reflects the roughness and/or surface energy exchange of an ocean surface. We test this potential {"}dynamical inconsistency{"} by examining simulated global atmospheric CO2 concentration driven by two different approaches to regridding fossil fuel CO2 emissions. The two approaches are as follows: (1) a commonly used method that allocates emissions to grid cells with no attempt to ensure dynamical consistency with atmospheric transport and (2) an improved method that reallocates emissions to grid cells to ensure dynamically consistent results. Results show large spatial and temporal differences in the simulated CO2 concentration when comparing these two approaches. The emissions difference ranges from '30.3 TgC grid cell'1 yr'1 ('3.39 kgC m'2 yr'1) to +30.0 TgC grid cell'1 yr'1 (+2.6 kgC m'2 yr'1) along coastal margins. Maximum simulated annual mean CO2 concentration differences at the surface exceed ±6 ppm at various locations and times. Examination of the current CO2 monitoring locations during the local afternoon, consistent with inversion modeling system sampling and measurement protocols, finds maximum hourly differences at 38 stations exceed ±0.10 ppm with individual station differences exceeding '32 ppm. The differences implied by not accounting for this dynamical consistency problem are largest at monitoring sites proximal to large coastal urban areas and point sources. These results suggest that studies comparing simulated to observed atmospheric CO2 concentration, such as atmospheric CO2 inversions, must take measures to correct for this potential problem and ensure flux and dynamical consistency.",
author = "X. Zhang and Kevin Gurney and P. Rayner and Y. Liu and S. Asefi-Najafabady",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "4",
doi = "10.5194/gmd-7-2867-2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "2867--2874",
journal = "Geoscientific Model Development",
issn = "1991-959X",
publisher = "Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity of simulated CO2 concentration to regridding of global fossil fuel CO2 emissions

AU - Zhang, X.

AU - Gurney, Kevin

AU - Rayner, P.

AU - Liu, Y.

AU - Asefi-Najafabady, S.

PY - 2014/12/4

Y1 - 2014/12/4

N2 - Errors in the specification or utilization of fossil fuel CO2 emissions within carbon budget or atmospheric CO2 inverse studies can alias the estimation of biospheric and oceanic carbon exchange. A key component in the simulation of CO2 concentrations arising from fossil fuel emissions is the spatial distribution of the emission near coastlines. Regridding of fossil fuel CO2 emissions (FFCO2) from fine to coarse grids to enable atmospheric transport simulations can give rise to mismatches between the emissions and simulated atmospheric dynamics which differ over land or water. For example, emissions originally emanating from the land are emitted from a grid cell for which the vertical mixing reflects the roughness and/or surface energy exchange of an ocean surface. We test this potential "dynamical inconsistency" by examining simulated global atmospheric CO2 concentration driven by two different approaches to regridding fossil fuel CO2 emissions. The two approaches are as follows: (1) a commonly used method that allocates emissions to grid cells with no attempt to ensure dynamical consistency with atmospheric transport and (2) an improved method that reallocates emissions to grid cells to ensure dynamically consistent results. Results show large spatial and temporal differences in the simulated CO2 concentration when comparing these two approaches. The emissions difference ranges from '30.3 TgC grid cell'1 yr'1 ('3.39 kgC m'2 yr'1) to +30.0 TgC grid cell'1 yr'1 (+2.6 kgC m'2 yr'1) along coastal margins. Maximum simulated annual mean CO2 concentration differences at the surface exceed ±6 ppm at various locations and times. Examination of the current CO2 monitoring locations during the local afternoon, consistent with inversion modeling system sampling and measurement protocols, finds maximum hourly differences at 38 stations exceed ±0.10 ppm with individual station differences exceeding '32 ppm. The differences implied by not accounting for this dynamical consistency problem are largest at monitoring sites proximal to large coastal urban areas and point sources. These results suggest that studies comparing simulated to observed atmospheric CO2 concentration, such as atmospheric CO2 inversions, must take measures to correct for this potential problem and ensure flux and dynamical consistency.

AB - Errors in the specification or utilization of fossil fuel CO2 emissions within carbon budget or atmospheric CO2 inverse studies can alias the estimation of biospheric and oceanic carbon exchange. A key component in the simulation of CO2 concentrations arising from fossil fuel emissions is the spatial distribution of the emission near coastlines. Regridding of fossil fuel CO2 emissions (FFCO2) from fine to coarse grids to enable atmospheric transport simulations can give rise to mismatches between the emissions and simulated atmospheric dynamics which differ over land or water. For example, emissions originally emanating from the land are emitted from a grid cell for which the vertical mixing reflects the roughness and/or surface energy exchange of an ocean surface. We test this potential "dynamical inconsistency" by examining simulated global atmospheric CO2 concentration driven by two different approaches to regridding fossil fuel CO2 emissions. The two approaches are as follows: (1) a commonly used method that allocates emissions to grid cells with no attempt to ensure dynamical consistency with atmospheric transport and (2) an improved method that reallocates emissions to grid cells to ensure dynamically consistent results. Results show large spatial and temporal differences in the simulated CO2 concentration when comparing these two approaches. The emissions difference ranges from '30.3 TgC grid cell'1 yr'1 ('3.39 kgC m'2 yr'1) to +30.0 TgC grid cell'1 yr'1 (+2.6 kgC m'2 yr'1) along coastal margins. Maximum simulated annual mean CO2 concentration differences at the surface exceed ±6 ppm at various locations and times. Examination of the current CO2 monitoring locations during the local afternoon, consistent with inversion modeling system sampling and measurement protocols, finds maximum hourly differences at 38 stations exceed ±0.10 ppm with individual station differences exceeding '32 ppm. The differences implied by not accounting for this dynamical consistency problem are largest at monitoring sites proximal to large coastal urban areas and point sources. These results suggest that studies comparing simulated to observed atmospheric CO2 concentration, such as atmospheric CO2 inversions, must take measures to correct for this potential problem and ensure flux and dynamical consistency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84915798256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84915798256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/gmd-7-2867-2014

DO - 10.5194/gmd-7-2867-2014

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 2867

EP - 2874

JO - Geoscientific Model Development

JF - Geoscientific Model Development

SN - 1991-959X

IS - 6

ER -