Sensitivity of a diagnostic test for amphibian ranavirus varies with sampling protocol

Amy L. Greer, James Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Field samples are commonly used to estimate disease prevalence in wild populations. Our confidence in these estimates requires understanding the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests. We assessed the sensitivity of the most commonly used diagnostic tests for amphibian Ranavirus by infecting salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum; Amphibia, Candata) with Ambystoma tigrinum virus (ATV) and then sampling euthanized animals (whole animal) and noneuthanized animals (tail clip) at five time intervals after exposure. We used a standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol to screen for ATV. Agreement between test results from whole-animal and tail-clip samples increased with time postexposure. This indicates that the ability to identify infected animals increases following exposure, leading to a more accurate estimate of prevalence in a population. Our results indicate that tail-clip sampling can underestimate the true prevalence of ATV in wild amphibian populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)525-532
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Wildlife Diseases
Volume43
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Ranavirus
Ambystoma
Amphibians
Ambystoma tigrinum virus
Routine Diagnostic Tests
diagnostic techniques
amphibian
amphibians
Surgical Instruments
animal
sampling
Tail
virus
tail
animals
Viruses
Population
Ambystoma tigrinum
disease prevalence
Urodela

Keywords

  • Ambys tomatigrinum virus
  • Ambystoma tigrinum
  • Amphibian
  • Non-lethal sampling
  • Polymerase chain reaction
  • Rana-virus
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Sensitivity of a diagnostic test for amphibian ranavirus varies with sampling protocol. / Greer, Amy L.; Collins, James.

In: Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Vol. 43, No. 3, 07.2007, p. 525-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{33518efeb69d4204bdd284ec5806e24b,
title = "Sensitivity of a diagnostic test for amphibian ranavirus varies with sampling protocol",
abstract = "Field samples are commonly used to estimate disease prevalence in wild populations. Our confidence in these estimates requires understanding the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests. We assessed the sensitivity of the most commonly used diagnostic tests for amphibian Ranavirus by infecting salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum; Amphibia, Candata) with Ambystoma tigrinum virus (ATV) and then sampling euthanized animals (whole animal) and noneuthanized animals (tail clip) at five time intervals after exposure. We used a standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol to screen for ATV. Agreement between test results from whole-animal and tail-clip samples increased with time postexposure. This indicates that the ability to identify infected animals increases following exposure, leading to a more accurate estimate of prevalence in a population. Our results indicate that tail-clip sampling can underestimate the true prevalence of ATV in wild amphibian populations.",
keywords = "Ambys tomatigrinum virus, Ambystoma tigrinum, Amphibian, Non-lethal sampling, Polymerase chain reaction, Rana-virus, Sensitivity, Specificity",
author = "Greer, {Amy L.} and James Collins",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "525--532",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Diseases",
issn = "0090-3558",
publisher = "Wildlife Disease Association, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity of a diagnostic test for amphibian ranavirus varies with sampling protocol

AU - Greer, Amy L.

AU - Collins, James

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Field samples are commonly used to estimate disease prevalence in wild populations. Our confidence in these estimates requires understanding the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests. We assessed the sensitivity of the most commonly used diagnostic tests for amphibian Ranavirus by infecting salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum; Amphibia, Candata) with Ambystoma tigrinum virus (ATV) and then sampling euthanized animals (whole animal) and noneuthanized animals (tail clip) at five time intervals after exposure. We used a standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol to screen for ATV. Agreement between test results from whole-animal and tail-clip samples increased with time postexposure. This indicates that the ability to identify infected animals increases following exposure, leading to a more accurate estimate of prevalence in a population. Our results indicate that tail-clip sampling can underestimate the true prevalence of ATV in wild amphibian populations.

AB - Field samples are commonly used to estimate disease prevalence in wild populations. Our confidence in these estimates requires understanding the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests. We assessed the sensitivity of the most commonly used diagnostic tests for amphibian Ranavirus by infecting salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum; Amphibia, Candata) with Ambystoma tigrinum virus (ATV) and then sampling euthanized animals (whole animal) and noneuthanized animals (tail clip) at five time intervals after exposure. We used a standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol to screen for ATV. Agreement between test results from whole-animal and tail-clip samples increased with time postexposure. This indicates that the ability to identify infected animals increases following exposure, leading to a more accurate estimate of prevalence in a population. Our results indicate that tail-clip sampling can underestimate the true prevalence of ATV in wild amphibian populations.

KW - Ambys tomatigrinum virus

KW - Ambystoma tigrinum

KW - Amphibian

KW - Non-lethal sampling

KW - Polymerase chain reaction

KW - Rana-virus

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548319099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548319099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17699094

AN - SCOPUS:34548319099

VL - 43

SP - 525

EP - 532

JO - Journal of Wildlife Diseases

JF - Journal of Wildlife Diseases

SN - 0090-3558

IS - 3

ER -