Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training

Sharon Kurpius, De WAYNE J KURPIUS, THOMAS C. FROEHLE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of self‐generated performance feedback, of expert performance feedback, and of no performance feedback on novice counselor trainee's production of counselor tacting response leads (CTRLs). Self‐generated performance feedback consisted of the participants responding to a video‐taped client and then orally evaluating their own response on the basis of a performance standard. Expert performance feedback consisted of verbal feedback from a designated expert given over a bug‐in‐the‐ear apparatus. Analysis of four measures of CTRLs revealed no differences resulting from either source of feedback—self or expert—however, those who received feedback outperformed the controls. These differences were maintained over a short time span. 1976 American Counseling Association

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-100
Number of pages10
JournalCounselor Education and Supervision
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1976

Fingerprint

performance
counselor
expert
performance standard
trainee
Counseling
counseling
Counselors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training. / Kurpius, Sharon; KURPIUS, De WAYNE J; FROEHLE, THOMAS C.

In: Counselor Education and Supervision, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1976, p. 91-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kurpius, Sharon ; KURPIUS, De WAYNE J ; FROEHLE, THOMAS C. / Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training. In: Counselor Education and Supervision. 1976 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 91-100.
@article{2a37146bc04e4a1d869c483e00f36ede,
title = "Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training",
abstract = "The present study examined the effect of self‐generated performance feedback, of expert performance feedback, and of no performance feedback on novice counselor trainee's production of counselor tacting response leads (CTRLs). Self‐generated performance feedback consisted of the participants responding to a video‐taped client and then orally evaluating their own response on the basis of a performance standard. Expert performance feedback consisted of verbal feedback from a designated expert given over a bug‐in‐the‐ear apparatus. Analysis of four measures of CTRLs revealed no differences resulting from either source of feedback—self or expert—however, those who received feedback outperformed the controls. These differences were maintained over a short time span. 1976 American Counseling Association",
author = "Sharon Kurpius and KURPIUS, {De WAYNE J} and FROEHLE, {THOMAS C.}",
year = "1976",
doi = "10.1002/j.1556-6978.1976.tb02016.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "91--100",
journal = "Counselor Education and Supervision",
issn = "0011-0035",
publisher = "American Counseling Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self‐Generated Performance Feedback in Interviewing Training

AU - Kurpius, Sharon

AU - KURPIUS, De WAYNE J

AU - FROEHLE, THOMAS C.

PY - 1976

Y1 - 1976

N2 - The present study examined the effect of self‐generated performance feedback, of expert performance feedback, and of no performance feedback on novice counselor trainee's production of counselor tacting response leads (CTRLs). Self‐generated performance feedback consisted of the participants responding to a video‐taped client and then orally evaluating their own response on the basis of a performance standard. Expert performance feedback consisted of verbal feedback from a designated expert given over a bug‐in‐the‐ear apparatus. Analysis of four measures of CTRLs revealed no differences resulting from either source of feedback—self or expert—however, those who received feedback outperformed the controls. These differences were maintained over a short time span. 1976 American Counseling Association

AB - The present study examined the effect of self‐generated performance feedback, of expert performance feedback, and of no performance feedback on novice counselor trainee's production of counselor tacting response leads (CTRLs). Self‐generated performance feedback consisted of the participants responding to a video‐taped client and then orally evaluating their own response on the basis of a performance standard. Expert performance feedback consisted of verbal feedback from a designated expert given over a bug‐in‐the‐ear apparatus. Analysis of four measures of CTRLs revealed no differences resulting from either source of feedback—self or expert—however, those who received feedback outperformed the controls. These differences were maintained over a short time span. 1976 American Counseling Association

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990420849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990420849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1976.tb02016.x

DO - 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1976.tb02016.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84990420849

VL - 19

SP - 91

EP - 100

JO - Counselor Education and Supervision

JF - Counselor Education and Supervision

SN - 0011-0035

IS - 2

ER -