Self-serving dishonest decisions can show facilitated cognitive dynamics

Maryam Tabatabaeian, Rick Dale, Nicholas Duran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

We use a novel task to test two competing hypotheses concerning the cognitive processes involved in dishonesty. Many existing accounts of deception imply that in order to act dishonestly one has to use cognitive control to overcome a bias toward the truth, which results in more time and effort. A recent hypothesis suggests that lying in order to serve self-interest may be a rapid, even automatic tendency taking less time than refraining from lying. In the current study, we track the action dynamics of potentially dishonest decisions to investigate the underlying cognitive processes. Participants are asked to privately predict the outcome of a virtual coin flip, report their accuracy and receive bonus credit for accurate predictions. The movements of the computer cursor toward the target answer are recorded and used to characterize the dynamics of decisions. Our results suggest that when a self-serving condition holds, decisions that have a high probability of being dishonest take less time and experience less hesitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-300
Number of pages10
JournalCognitive Processing
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 25 2015

Keywords

  • Action dynamics
  • Cognitive processes
  • Decision-making
  • Dishonesty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Self-serving dishonest decisions can show facilitated cognitive dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this