Self-Monitoring of Attention versus Self-Monitoring of Performance

Effects on Attention and Academic Performance

Robert Reid, Karen Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the effects of two types of self-monitoring on attention and academic performance. Twenty-eight students with learning disabilities were taught a spelling study procedure (SSP), followed by instruction in self-monitoring of performance (SMP) and self-monitoring of attention (SMA). Results showed that on-task behavior was significantly higher in both SMA and SMP than in SSP. Number of correct practices was significantly higher in SMP than in SSP. Spelling achievement was significantly lower in SMA than in SSP, and spelling maintenance was significantly lower in SMA than in SSP and SMP. Student interviews indicated that SMA is experienced as intrusive. The type of self-monitoring used may have direct, significant effects on academic outcomes; there does not appear to be a “best” method of self-monitoring for all students on all tasks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-40
Number of pages12
JournalExceptional Children
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

monitoring
performance
Students
Learning Disorders
Maintenance
Interviews
student
learning disability
instruction
interview

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Self-Monitoring of Attention versus Self-Monitoring of Performance : Effects on Attention and Academic Performance. / Reid, Robert; Harris, Karen.

In: Exceptional Children, Vol. 60, No. 1, 1993, p. 29-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bc0405b2d2c4c1f90d6ac0b3c7ffd96,
title = "Self-Monitoring of Attention versus Self-Monitoring of Performance: Effects on Attention and Academic Performance",
abstract = "This study compared the effects of two types of self-monitoring on attention and academic performance. Twenty-eight students with learning disabilities were taught a spelling study procedure (SSP), followed by instruction in self-monitoring of performance (SMP) and self-monitoring of attention (SMA). Results showed that on-task behavior was significantly higher in both SMA and SMP than in SSP. Number of correct practices was significantly higher in SMP than in SSP. Spelling achievement was significantly lower in SMA than in SSP, and spelling maintenance was significantly lower in SMA than in SSP and SMP. Student interviews indicated that SMA is experienced as intrusive. The type of self-monitoring used may have direct, significant effects on academic outcomes; there does not appear to be a “best” method of self-monitoring for all students on all tasks.",
author = "Robert Reid and Karen Harris",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1177/001440299306000104",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "29--40",
journal = "Exceptional Children",
issn = "0014-4029",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-Monitoring of Attention versus Self-Monitoring of Performance

T2 - Effects on Attention and Academic Performance

AU - Reid, Robert

AU - Harris, Karen

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - This study compared the effects of two types of self-monitoring on attention and academic performance. Twenty-eight students with learning disabilities were taught a spelling study procedure (SSP), followed by instruction in self-monitoring of performance (SMP) and self-monitoring of attention (SMA). Results showed that on-task behavior was significantly higher in both SMA and SMP than in SSP. Number of correct practices was significantly higher in SMP than in SSP. Spelling achievement was significantly lower in SMA than in SSP, and spelling maintenance was significantly lower in SMA than in SSP and SMP. Student interviews indicated that SMA is experienced as intrusive. The type of self-monitoring used may have direct, significant effects on academic outcomes; there does not appear to be a “best” method of self-monitoring for all students on all tasks.

AB - This study compared the effects of two types of self-monitoring on attention and academic performance. Twenty-eight students with learning disabilities were taught a spelling study procedure (SSP), followed by instruction in self-monitoring of performance (SMP) and self-monitoring of attention (SMA). Results showed that on-task behavior was significantly higher in both SMA and SMP than in SSP. Number of correct practices was significantly higher in SMP than in SSP. Spelling achievement was significantly lower in SMA than in SSP, and spelling maintenance was significantly lower in SMA than in SSP and SMP. Student interviews indicated that SMA is experienced as intrusive. The type of self-monitoring used may have direct, significant effects on academic outcomes; there does not appear to be a “best” method of self-monitoring for all students on all tasks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002641434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002641434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001440299306000104

DO - 10.1177/001440299306000104

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 29

EP - 40

JO - Exceptional Children

JF - Exceptional Children

SN - 0014-4029

IS - 1

ER -