SELF-EFFICACY AND CONFIDENCE: THEORETICAL DISTINCTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TRIAL CONSULTATION

Robert J. Cramer; Tess M.S. Neal; Stanley L. Brodsky

doi:10.1037/a0017310

SELF-EFFICACY AND CONFIDENCE: THEORETICAL DISTINCTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TRIAL CONSULTATION

Robert J. Cramer, Tess M.S. Neal, Stanley L. Brodsky

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Self-Efficacy Theory (SET; Bandura, 1986, 2000) has generated research and practice ramifications across areas of psychology. However, self-efficacy has yet to be assessed in a legal context. This article juxtaposes self-efficacy with self-confidence in terms of theoretical foundations and practical implications, with attention to the area of witness testimony. It is concluded that the concept of witness self-efficacy possesses thorough theoretical grounding as a potential target for witness preparation. As such, we put forth an integrated model of witness preparation featuring self-efficacy-bolstering techniques within an established witness-training framework.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	319-334
Number of pages	16
Journal	Consulting Psychology Journal
Volume	61
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017310
State	Published - Dec 2009
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

confidence
self-efficacy
witness preparation
witness testimony

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Developmental and Educational Psychology
Psychology (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1037/a0017310

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'SELF-EFFICACY AND CONFIDENCE: THEORETICAL DISTINCTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TRIAL CONSULTATION'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{45e638fe9e304939a4f9019efa3ea00a,

title = "SELF-EFFICACY AND CONFIDENCE: THEORETICAL DISTINCTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TRIAL CONSULTATION",

abstract = "Self-Efficacy Theory (SET; Bandura, 1986, 2000) has generated research and practice ramifications across areas of psychology. However, self-efficacy has yet to be assessed in a legal context. This article juxtaposes self-efficacy with self-confidence in terms of theoretical foundations and practical implications, with attention to the area of witness testimony. It is concluded that the concept of witness self-efficacy possesses thorough theoretical grounding as a potential target for witness preparation. As such, we put forth an integrated model of witness preparation featuring self-efficacy-bolstering techniques within an established witness-training framework.",

keywords = "confidence, self-efficacy, witness preparation, witness testimony",

author = "Cramer, {Robert J.} and Neal, {Tess M.S.} and Brodsky, {Stanley L.}",

year = "2009",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1037/a0017310",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "61",

pages = "319--334",

journal = "Consulting Psychology Journal",

issn = "1061-4087",

publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SELF-EFFICACY AND CONFIDENCE

T2 - THEORETICAL DISTINCTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TRIAL CONSULTATION

AU - Cramer, Robert J.

AU - Neal, Tess M.S.

AU - Brodsky, Stanley L.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Self-Efficacy Theory (SET; Bandura, 1986, 2000) has generated research and practice ramifications across areas of psychology. However, self-efficacy has yet to be assessed in a legal context. This article juxtaposes self-efficacy with self-confidence in terms of theoretical foundations and practical implications, with attention to the area of witness testimony. It is concluded that the concept of witness self-efficacy possesses thorough theoretical grounding as a potential target for witness preparation. As such, we put forth an integrated model of witness preparation featuring self-efficacy-bolstering techniques within an established witness-training framework.

AB - Self-Efficacy Theory (SET; Bandura, 1986, 2000) has generated research and practice ramifications across areas of psychology. However, self-efficacy has yet to be assessed in a legal context. This article juxtaposes self-efficacy with self-confidence in terms of theoretical foundations and practical implications, with attention to the area of witness testimony. It is concluded that the concept of witness self-efficacy possesses thorough theoretical grounding as a potential target for witness preparation. As such, we put forth an integrated model of witness preparation featuring self-efficacy-bolstering techniques within an established witness-training framework.

KW - confidence

KW - self-efficacy

KW - witness preparation

KW - witness testimony

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74049150558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74049150558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0017310

DO - 10.1037/a0017310

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:74049150558

VL - 61

SP - 319

EP - 334

JO - Consulting Psychology Journal

JF - Consulting Psychology Journal

SN - 1061-4087

IS - 4

ER -

SELF-EFFICACY AND CONFIDENCE: THEORETICAL DISTINCTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TRIAL CONSULTATION

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this