Selecting and coordinating local and regional climate change interventions

Daniel Culotta, Arnim Wiek, Nigel Forrest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Local and regional organizations are designing and implementing interventions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions through various programs and projects. These efforts have been less effective than anticipated, and emissions have continued to rise. Because awareness, intent, planning, and actions are all present, yet results not being achieved, the processes organizations use to select interventions may be insufficient. We derive criteria to assess intervention selection processes from the literature and use them to evaluate the intervention selection processes of a county-wide climate change mitigation initiative in Sonoma County, California. The initiative in Sonoma County is far short of its 2015 emissions reduction goal. Our analysis suggests the initiative’s process has shortcomings including poor coordination, a focus on end-use emissions instead of systemic solutions, and short-term opportunism. We also find that the governance of the county-wide initiative may also have been a significant factor in failing to achieve the goal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1241-1266
Number of pages26
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

regional climate
climate change
opportunism
greenhouse gas
governance
planning
county
climate change mitigation
analysis
co-ordination
emission reduction
project
programme

Keywords

  • effectiveness
  • evidence-based policy making
  • Local climate action
  • local governance
  • sustainability transitions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Selecting and coordinating local and regional climate change interventions. / Culotta, Daniel; Wiek, Arnim; Forrest, Nigel.

In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 34, No. 7, 01.11.2016, p. 1241-1266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{19d9970329ca46a0a9ff12eed7bbb270,
title = "Selecting and coordinating local and regional climate change interventions",
abstract = "Local and regional organizations are designing and implementing interventions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions through various programs and projects. These efforts have been less effective than anticipated, and emissions have continued to rise. Because awareness, intent, planning, and actions are all present, yet results not being achieved, the processes organizations use to select interventions may be insufficient. We derive criteria to assess intervention selection processes from the literature and use them to evaluate the intervention selection processes of a county-wide climate change mitigation initiative in Sonoma County, California. The initiative in Sonoma County is far short of its 2015 emissions reduction goal. Our analysis suggests the initiative’s process has shortcomings including poor coordination, a focus on end-use emissions instead of systemic solutions, and short-term opportunism. We also find that the governance of the county-wide initiative may also have been a significant factor in failing to achieve the goal.",
keywords = "effectiveness, evidence-based policy making, Local climate action, local governance, sustainability transitions",
author = "Daniel Culotta and Arnim Wiek and Nigel Forrest",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0263774X15607475",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "1241--1266",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space",
issn = "2399-6544",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selecting and coordinating local and regional climate change interventions

AU - Culotta, Daniel

AU - Wiek, Arnim

AU - Forrest, Nigel

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Local and regional organizations are designing and implementing interventions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions through various programs and projects. These efforts have been less effective than anticipated, and emissions have continued to rise. Because awareness, intent, planning, and actions are all present, yet results not being achieved, the processes organizations use to select interventions may be insufficient. We derive criteria to assess intervention selection processes from the literature and use them to evaluate the intervention selection processes of a county-wide climate change mitigation initiative in Sonoma County, California. The initiative in Sonoma County is far short of its 2015 emissions reduction goal. Our analysis suggests the initiative’s process has shortcomings including poor coordination, a focus on end-use emissions instead of systemic solutions, and short-term opportunism. We also find that the governance of the county-wide initiative may also have been a significant factor in failing to achieve the goal.

AB - Local and regional organizations are designing and implementing interventions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions through various programs and projects. These efforts have been less effective than anticipated, and emissions have continued to rise. Because awareness, intent, planning, and actions are all present, yet results not being achieved, the processes organizations use to select interventions may be insufficient. We derive criteria to assess intervention selection processes from the literature and use them to evaluate the intervention selection processes of a county-wide climate change mitigation initiative in Sonoma County, California. The initiative in Sonoma County is far short of its 2015 emissions reduction goal. Our analysis suggests the initiative’s process has shortcomings including poor coordination, a focus on end-use emissions instead of systemic solutions, and short-term opportunism. We also find that the governance of the county-wide initiative may also have been a significant factor in failing to achieve the goal.

KW - effectiveness

KW - evidence-based policy making

KW - Local climate action

KW - local governance

KW - sustainability transitions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994226398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994226398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0263774X15607475

DO - 10.1177/0263774X15607475

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994226398

VL - 34

SP - 1241

EP - 1266

JO - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

JF - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space

SN - 2399-6544

IS - 7

ER -