Secure Messaging with Physicians by Proxies for Patients with Diabetes

Findings from the ECLIPPSE Study

Wagahta Semere, Scott Crossley, Andrew J. Karter, Courtney R. Lyles, William Brown, Mary Reed, Danielle McNamara, Jennifer Y. Liu, Dean Schillinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Little is known about patients who have caregiver proxies communicate with healthcare providers via portal secure messaging (SM). Since proxy portal use is often informal (e.g., sharing patient accounts), novel methods are needed to estimate the prevalence of proxy-authored SMs. Objective: (1) Develop an algorithm to identify proxy-authored SMs, (2) apply this algorithm to estimate predicted proxy SM (PPSM) prevalence among patients with diabetes, and (3) explore patient characteristics associated with having PPSMs. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: We examined 9856 patients from Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE) who sent ≥ 1 English-language SM to their primary care physician between July 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2015. Main Measures: Using computational linguistics, we developed ProxyID, an algorithm that identifies phrases frequently found in registered proxy SMs. ProxyID was validated against blinded expert categorization of proxy status among an SM sample, then applied to identify PPSM prevalence across patients. We examined patients’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics according to PPSM penetrance, “none” (0%), “low” (≥ 0–50%), and “high” (≥ 50–100%). Key Results: Only 2.3% of patients had ≥ 1 registered proxy-authored SM. ProxyID demonstrated moderate agreement with expert classification (Κ = 0.58); 45.7% of patients had PPSMs (40.2% low and 5.5% high). Patients with high percent PPSMs were older than those with low percent and no PPSMs (66.5 vs 57.4 vs 56.2 years, p < 0.001) had higher rates of limited English proficiency (16.1% vs 3.2% vs 3.5%, p < 0.05), lower self-reported health literacy (3.83 vs 4.43 vs 4.44, p < 0.001), and more comorbidities (Charlson index 3.78 vs 2.35 vs 2.18, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients with diabetes, informal proxy SM use is more common than registered use and prevalent among socially and medically vulnerable patients. Future research should explore whether proxy portal use improves patient and/or caregiver outcomes and consider policies that integrate caregivers in portal communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Proxy
Physicians
Caregivers
Health Literacy
Penetrance
Primary Care Physicians
Linguistics
Health Personnel
Comorbidity
Cohort Studies
Language
Retrospective Studies
Communication

Keywords

  • caregiving
  • diabetes
  • health communication
  • health information technology (health IT)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Secure Messaging with Physicians by Proxies for Patients with Diabetes : Findings from the ECLIPPSE Study. / Semere, Wagahta; Crossley, Scott; Karter, Andrew J.; Lyles, Courtney R.; Brown, William; Reed, Mary; McNamara, Danielle; Liu, Jennifer Y.; Schillinger, Dean.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Semere, Wagahta ; Crossley, Scott ; Karter, Andrew J. ; Lyles, Courtney R. ; Brown, William ; Reed, Mary ; McNamara, Danielle ; Liu, Jennifer Y. ; Schillinger, Dean. / Secure Messaging with Physicians by Proxies for Patients with Diabetes : Findings from the ECLIPPSE Study. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2019.
@article{890517f7a95043f9af4f2c1a0fee2469,
title = "Secure Messaging with Physicians by Proxies for Patients with Diabetes: Findings from the ECLIPPSE Study",
abstract = "Background: Little is known about patients who have caregiver proxies communicate with healthcare providers via portal secure messaging (SM). Since proxy portal use is often informal (e.g., sharing patient accounts), novel methods are needed to estimate the prevalence of proxy-authored SMs. Objective: (1) Develop an algorithm to identify proxy-authored SMs, (2) apply this algorithm to estimate predicted proxy SM (PPSM) prevalence among patients with diabetes, and (3) explore patient characteristics associated with having PPSMs. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: We examined 9856 patients from Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE) who sent ≥ 1 English-language SM to their primary care physician between July 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2015. Main Measures: Using computational linguistics, we developed ProxyID, an algorithm that identifies phrases frequently found in registered proxy SMs. ProxyID was validated against blinded expert categorization of proxy status among an SM sample, then applied to identify PPSM prevalence across patients. We examined patients’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics according to PPSM penetrance, “none” (0{\%}), “low” (≥ 0–50{\%}), and “high” (≥ 50–100{\%}). Key Results: Only 2.3{\%} of patients had ≥ 1 registered proxy-authored SM. ProxyID demonstrated moderate agreement with expert classification (Κ = 0.58); 45.7{\%} of patients had PPSMs (40.2{\%} low and 5.5{\%} high). Patients with high percent PPSMs were older than those with low percent and no PPSMs (66.5 vs 57.4 vs 56.2 years, p < 0.001) had higher rates of limited English proficiency (16.1{\%} vs 3.2{\%} vs 3.5{\%}, p < 0.05), lower self-reported health literacy (3.83 vs 4.43 vs 4.44, p < 0.001), and more comorbidities (Charlson index 3.78 vs 2.35 vs 2.18, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients with diabetes, informal proxy SM use is more common than registered use and prevalent among socially and medically vulnerable patients. Future research should explore whether proxy portal use improves patient and/or caregiver outcomes and consider policies that integrate caregivers in portal communication.",
keywords = "caregiving, diabetes, health communication, health information technology (health IT)",
author = "Wagahta Semere and Scott Crossley and Karter, {Andrew J.} and Lyles, {Courtney R.} and William Brown and Mary Reed and Danielle McNamara and Liu, {Jennifer Y.} and Dean Schillinger",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-019-05259-1",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secure Messaging with Physicians by Proxies for Patients with Diabetes

T2 - Findings from the ECLIPPSE Study

AU - Semere, Wagahta

AU - Crossley, Scott

AU - Karter, Andrew J.

AU - Lyles, Courtney R.

AU - Brown, William

AU - Reed, Mary

AU - McNamara, Danielle

AU - Liu, Jennifer Y.

AU - Schillinger, Dean

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Little is known about patients who have caregiver proxies communicate with healthcare providers via portal secure messaging (SM). Since proxy portal use is often informal (e.g., sharing patient accounts), novel methods are needed to estimate the prevalence of proxy-authored SMs. Objective: (1) Develop an algorithm to identify proxy-authored SMs, (2) apply this algorithm to estimate predicted proxy SM (PPSM) prevalence among patients with diabetes, and (3) explore patient characteristics associated with having PPSMs. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: We examined 9856 patients from Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE) who sent ≥ 1 English-language SM to their primary care physician between July 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2015. Main Measures: Using computational linguistics, we developed ProxyID, an algorithm that identifies phrases frequently found in registered proxy SMs. ProxyID was validated against blinded expert categorization of proxy status among an SM sample, then applied to identify PPSM prevalence across patients. We examined patients’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics according to PPSM penetrance, “none” (0%), “low” (≥ 0–50%), and “high” (≥ 50–100%). Key Results: Only 2.3% of patients had ≥ 1 registered proxy-authored SM. ProxyID demonstrated moderate agreement with expert classification (Κ = 0.58); 45.7% of patients had PPSMs (40.2% low and 5.5% high). Patients with high percent PPSMs were older than those with low percent and no PPSMs (66.5 vs 57.4 vs 56.2 years, p < 0.001) had higher rates of limited English proficiency (16.1% vs 3.2% vs 3.5%, p < 0.05), lower self-reported health literacy (3.83 vs 4.43 vs 4.44, p < 0.001), and more comorbidities (Charlson index 3.78 vs 2.35 vs 2.18, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients with diabetes, informal proxy SM use is more common than registered use and prevalent among socially and medically vulnerable patients. Future research should explore whether proxy portal use improves patient and/or caregiver outcomes and consider policies that integrate caregivers in portal communication.

AB - Background: Little is known about patients who have caregiver proxies communicate with healthcare providers via portal secure messaging (SM). Since proxy portal use is often informal (e.g., sharing patient accounts), novel methods are needed to estimate the prevalence of proxy-authored SMs. Objective: (1) Develop an algorithm to identify proxy-authored SMs, (2) apply this algorithm to estimate predicted proxy SM (PPSM) prevalence among patients with diabetes, and (3) explore patient characteristics associated with having PPSMs. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: We examined 9856 patients from Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE) who sent ≥ 1 English-language SM to their primary care physician between July 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2015. Main Measures: Using computational linguistics, we developed ProxyID, an algorithm that identifies phrases frequently found in registered proxy SMs. ProxyID was validated against blinded expert categorization of proxy status among an SM sample, then applied to identify PPSM prevalence across patients. We examined patients’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics according to PPSM penetrance, “none” (0%), “low” (≥ 0–50%), and “high” (≥ 50–100%). Key Results: Only 2.3% of patients had ≥ 1 registered proxy-authored SM. ProxyID demonstrated moderate agreement with expert classification (Κ = 0.58); 45.7% of patients had PPSMs (40.2% low and 5.5% high). Patients with high percent PPSMs were older than those with low percent and no PPSMs (66.5 vs 57.4 vs 56.2 years, p < 0.001) had higher rates of limited English proficiency (16.1% vs 3.2% vs 3.5%, p < 0.05), lower self-reported health literacy (3.83 vs 4.43 vs 4.44, p < 0.001), and more comorbidities (Charlson index 3.78 vs 2.35 vs 2.18, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients with diabetes, informal proxy SM use is more common than registered use and prevalent among socially and medically vulnerable patients. Future research should explore whether proxy portal use improves patient and/or caregiver outcomes and consider policies that integrate caregivers in portal communication.

KW - caregiving

KW - diabetes

KW - health communication

KW - health information technology (health IT)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071169730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071169730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-019-05259-1

DO - 10.1007/s11606-019-05259-1

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

ER -