"Scrub"

Using Multi-Site Analysis to Analyze the Status System among Basketball Players

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conducting ethnographic fieldwork in varied spaces, with different actors, enriches our understanding. A researcher may find paradoxes in practices and ideas and ask for clarification, or recognize that social dynamics and behavior are peculiar to group members present in a specific setting. This article highlights the usefulness of intentional variability and flexibility in the field. Researchers should plan to do multi-site analysis (MSA) to look for negative cases and opportunities to challenge commonsense notions. Additionally, this article emphasizes that the relationships built during fieldwork shape the data that are captured. Therefore, researchers need to consider the bases for their relationships, including what the subjects get out of them, and how subjects' positionality affects what comes to be known. This perspective de-emphasizes false norms of objectivity and renders a more complete account of the social worlds we study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-95
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume642
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

objectivity
group membership
flexibility
present

Keywords

  • basketball
  • ethnographic relationship
  • multi-site analysis
  • status
  • vouching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{ea4f2ee13b7849d5acf323d157c5837f,
title = "{"}Scrub{"}: Using Multi-Site Analysis to Analyze the Status System among Basketball Players",
abstract = "Conducting ethnographic fieldwork in varied spaces, with different actors, enriches our understanding. A researcher may find paradoxes in practices and ideas and ask for clarification, or recognize that social dynamics and behavior are peculiar to group members present in a specific setting. This article highlights the usefulness of intentional variability and flexibility in the field. Researchers should plan to do multi-site analysis (MSA) to look for negative cases and opportunities to challenge commonsense notions. Additionally, this article emphasizes that the relationships built during fieldwork shape the data that are captured. Therefore, researchers need to consider the bases for their relationships, including what the subjects get out of them, and how subjects' positionality affects what comes to be known. This perspective de-emphasizes false norms of objectivity and renders a more complete account of the social worlds we study.",
keywords = "basketball, ethnographic relationship, multi-site analysis, status, vouching",
author = "Scott Brooks",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0002716212438199",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "642",
pages = "86--95",
journal = "Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science",
issn = "0002-7162",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Scrub"

T2 - Using Multi-Site Analysis to Analyze the Status System among Basketball Players

AU - Brooks, Scott

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Conducting ethnographic fieldwork in varied spaces, with different actors, enriches our understanding. A researcher may find paradoxes in practices and ideas and ask for clarification, or recognize that social dynamics and behavior are peculiar to group members present in a specific setting. This article highlights the usefulness of intentional variability and flexibility in the field. Researchers should plan to do multi-site analysis (MSA) to look for negative cases and opportunities to challenge commonsense notions. Additionally, this article emphasizes that the relationships built during fieldwork shape the data that are captured. Therefore, researchers need to consider the bases for their relationships, including what the subjects get out of them, and how subjects' positionality affects what comes to be known. This perspective de-emphasizes false norms of objectivity and renders a more complete account of the social worlds we study.

AB - Conducting ethnographic fieldwork in varied spaces, with different actors, enriches our understanding. A researcher may find paradoxes in practices and ideas and ask for clarification, or recognize that social dynamics and behavior are peculiar to group members present in a specific setting. This article highlights the usefulness of intentional variability and flexibility in the field. Researchers should plan to do multi-site analysis (MSA) to look for negative cases and opportunities to challenge commonsense notions. Additionally, this article emphasizes that the relationships built during fieldwork shape the data that are captured. Therefore, researchers need to consider the bases for their relationships, including what the subjects get out of them, and how subjects' positionality affects what comes to be known. This perspective de-emphasizes false norms of objectivity and renders a more complete account of the social worlds we study.

KW - basketball

KW - ethnographic relationship

KW - multi-site analysis

KW - status

KW - vouching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861842412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861842412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0002716212438199

DO - 10.1177/0002716212438199

M3 - Article

VL - 642

SP - 86

EP - 95

JO - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

JF - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

SN - 0002-7162

IS - 1

ER -