Scientists’ Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research

Elizabeth Corley, Youngjae Kim, Dietram A. Scheufele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scientists’ sense of social responsibility is particularly relevant for emerging technologies. Since a regulatory vacuum can sometimes occur in the early stages of these technologies, individual scientists’ social responsibility might be one of the most significant checks on the risks and negative consequences of this scientific research. In this article, we analyze data from a 2011 mail survey of leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore their perceptions the regarding social and ethical responsibilities for their nanotechnology research. Our analyses show that leading U.S. nanoscientists express a moderate level of social responsibility about their research. Yet, they have a strong sense of ethical obligation to protect laboratory workers (in both universities and industry) from unhealthy exposure to nanomaterials. We also find that there are significant differences in scientists’ sense of social and ethical responsibility depending on their demographic characteristics, job affiliation, attention to media content, risk perceptions and benefit perceptions. We conclude with some implications for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-132
Number of pages22
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Nanotechnology
nanotechnology
Social Responsibility
social responsibility
obligation
Research
Technology
Risk perception
Social Perception
job characteristics
responsibility
Nanomaterials
Nanostructures
mail survey
social cognition
Postal Service
Vacuum
Nanostructured materials
Industry
Demography

Keywords

  • Nanotechnology
  • Research ethics
  • Scientist perceptions
  • Social responsibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Scientists’ Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research. / Corley, Elizabeth; Kim, Youngjae; Scheufele, Dietram A.

In: Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 111-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd3e9c076f874c58b62e928764647faf,
title = "Scientists’ Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research",
abstract = "Scientists’ sense of social responsibility is particularly relevant for emerging technologies. Since a regulatory vacuum can sometimes occur in the early stages of these technologies, individual scientists’ social responsibility might be one of the most significant checks on the risks and negative consequences of this scientific research. In this article, we analyze data from a 2011 mail survey of leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore their perceptions the regarding social and ethical responsibilities for their nanotechnology research. Our analyses show that leading U.S. nanoscientists express a moderate level of social responsibility about their research. Yet, they have a strong sense of ethical obligation to protect laboratory workers (in both universities and industry) from unhealthy exposure to nanomaterials. We also find that there are significant differences in scientists’ sense of social and ethical responsibility depending on their demographic characteristics, job affiliation, attention to media content, risk perceptions and benefit perceptions. We conclude with some implications for future research.",
keywords = "Nanotechnology, Research ethics, Scientist perceptions, Social responsibility",
author = "Elizabeth Corley and Youngjae Kim and Scheufele, {Dietram A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11948-015-9637-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "111--132",
journal = "Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics",
issn = "1660-5446",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientists’ Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research

AU - Corley, Elizabeth

AU - Kim, Youngjae

AU - Scheufele, Dietram A.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Scientists’ sense of social responsibility is particularly relevant for emerging technologies. Since a regulatory vacuum can sometimes occur in the early stages of these technologies, individual scientists’ social responsibility might be one of the most significant checks on the risks and negative consequences of this scientific research. In this article, we analyze data from a 2011 mail survey of leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore their perceptions the regarding social and ethical responsibilities for their nanotechnology research. Our analyses show that leading U.S. nanoscientists express a moderate level of social responsibility about their research. Yet, they have a strong sense of ethical obligation to protect laboratory workers (in both universities and industry) from unhealthy exposure to nanomaterials. We also find that there are significant differences in scientists’ sense of social and ethical responsibility depending on their demographic characteristics, job affiliation, attention to media content, risk perceptions and benefit perceptions. We conclude with some implications for future research.

AB - Scientists’ sense of social responsibility is particularly relevant for emerging technologies. Since a regulatory vacuum can sometimes occur in the early stages of these technologies, individual scientists’ social responsibility might be one of the most significant checks on the risks and negative consequences of this scientific research. In this article, we analyze data from a 2011 mail survey of leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore their perceptions the regarding social and ethical responsibilities for their nanotechnology research. Our analyses show that leading U.S. nanoscientists express a moderate level of social responsibility about their research. Yet, they have a strong sense of ethical obligation to protect laboratory workers (in both universities and industry) from unhealthy exposure to nanomaterials. We also find that there are significant differences in scientists’ sense of social and ethical responsibility depending on their demographic characteristics, job affiliation, attention to media content, risk perceptions and benefit perceptions. We conclude with some implications for future research.

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - Research ethics

KW - Scientist perceptions

KW - Social responsibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955647948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955647948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11948-015-9637-1

DO - 10.1007/s11948-015-9637-1

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 111

EP - 132

JO - Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics

JF - Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics

SN - 1660-5446

IS - 1

ER -