Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine

Mohamed Y. Rady, Joseph L. Verheijde, Joan McGregor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: We review (1) scientific evidence questioning the validity of declaring death and procuring organs in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard of death) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard of death) donation; (2) consequences of collaborative programs realigning hospital policies to maximize access of procurement coordinators to critically and terminally ill patients as potential donors on arrival in emergency departments; and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of current practices of organ procurement on patients and their families. Data sources: Relevant publications in peer-reviewed journals and government websites. Results: Scientific evidence undermines the biological criteria of death that underpin the definition of death in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard) donation. Philosophical reinterpretation of the neurological and circulatory-respiratory standards in the death statute, to avoid the appearance of organ procurement as an active life-ending intervention, lacks public and medical consensus. Collaborative programs bundle procurement coordinators together with hospital staff for a team-huddle and implement a quality improvement tool for a Rapid Assessment of Hospital Procurement Barriers in Donation. Procurement coordinators have access to critically ill patients during the course of medical treatment with no donation consent and with family or surrogates unaware of their roles. How these programs affect the medical care of these patients has not been studied. Conclusions: Policies enforcing end-of-life organ procurement can have unintended consequences: (1) erosion of care in the patient's best interests, (2) lack of transparency, and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of flawed standards of declaring death.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1069-1078
Number of pages10
JournalResuscitation
Volume81
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Tissue and Organ Procurement
Emergency Medicine
Critical Illness
Patient Care
Terminally Ill
Information Storage and Retrieval
Quality Improvement
Publications
Hospital Emergency Service
Consensus
Tissue Donors

Keywords

  • Brain death
  • Cardiac death
  • Circulatory death
  • Collaborative programs
  • Death statute
  • End of life
  • Ethics
  • Heart-beating donation
  • Informed consent
  • Legislations
  • Non-heart-beating donation
  • Organ donation
  • Procurement coordinators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Emergency
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine. / Rady, Mohamed Y.; Verheijde, Joseph L.; McGregor, Joan.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 81, No. 9, 09.2010, p. 1069-1078.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rady, Mohamed Y. ; Verheijde, Joseph L. ; McGregor, Joan. / Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine. In: Resuscitation. 2010 ; Vol. 81, No. 9. pp. 1069-1078.
@article{baeb75e77f074787b9b7205fa0d8b9f0,
title = "Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine",
abstract = "Aim: We review (1) scientific evidence questioning the validity of declaring death and procuring organs in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard of death) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard of death) donation; (2) consequences of collaborative programs realigning hospital policies to maximize access of procurement coordinators to critically and terminally ill patients as potential donors on arrival in emergency departments; and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of current practices of organ procurement on patients and their families. Data sources: Relevant publications in peer-reviewed journals and government websites. Results: Scientific evidence undermines the biological criteria of death that underpin the definition of death in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard) donation. Philosophical reinterpretation of the neurological and circulatory-respiratory standards in the death statute, to avoid the appearance of organ procurement as an active life-ending intervention, lacks public and medical consensus. Collaborative programs bundle procurement coordinators together with hospital staff for a team-huddle and implement a quality improvement tool for a Rapid Assessment of Hospital Procurement Barriers in Donation. Procurement coordinators have access to critically ill patients during the course of medical treatment with no donation consent and with family or surrogates unaware of their roles. How these programs affect the medical care of these patients has not been studied. Conclusions: Policies enforcing end-of-life organ procurement can have unintended consequences: (1) erosion of care in the patient's best interests, (2) lack of transparency, and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of flawed standards of declaring death.",
keywords = "Brain death, Cardiac death, Circulatory death, Collaborative programs, Death statute, End of life, Ethics, Heart-beating donation, Informed consent, Legislations, Non-heart-beating donation, Organ donation, Procurement coordinators",
author = "Rady, {Mohamed Y.} and Verheijde, {Joseph L.} and Joan McGregor",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "1069--1078",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine

AU - Rady, Mohamed Y.

AU - Verheijde, Joseph L.

AU - McGregor, Joan

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Aim: We review (1) scientific evidence questioning the validity of declaring death and procuring organs in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard of death) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard of death) donation; (2) consequences of collaborative programs realigning hospital policies to maximize access of procurement coordinators to critically and terminally ill patients as potential donors on arrival in emergency departments; and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of current practices of organ procurement on patients and their families. Data sources: Relevant publications in peer-reviewed journals and government websites. Results: Scientific evidence undermines the biological criteria of death that underpin the definition of death in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard) donation. Philosophical reinterpretation of the neurological and circulatory-respiratory standards in the death statute, to avoid the appearance of organ procurement as an active life-ending intervention, lacks public and medical consensus. Collaborative programs bundle procurement coordinators together with hospital staff for a team-huddle and implement a quality improvement tool for a Rapid Assessment of Hospital Procurement Barriers in Donation. Procurement coordinators have access to critically ill patients during the course of medical treatment with no donation consent and with family or surrogates unaware of their roles. How these programs affect the medical care of these patients has not been studied. Conclusions: Policies enforcing end-of-life organ procurement can have unintended consequences: (1) erosion of care in the patient's best interests, (2) lack of transparency, and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of flawed standards of declaring death.

AB - Aim: We review (1) scientific evidence questioning the validity of declaring death and procuring organs in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard of death) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard of death) donation; (2) consequences of collaborative programs realigning hospital policies to maximize access of procurement coordinators to critically and terminally ill patients as potential donors on arrival in emergency departments; and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of current practices of organ procurement on patients and their families. Data sources: Relevant publications in peer-reviewed journals and government websites. Results: Scientific evidence undermines the biological criteria of death that underpin the definition of death in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard) donation. Philosophical reinterpretation of the neurological and circulatory-respiratory standards in the death statute, to avoid the appearance of organ procurement as an active life-ending intervention, lacks public and medical consensus. Collaborative programs bundle procurement coordinators together with hospital staff for a team-huddle and implement a quality improvement tool for a Rapid Assessment of Hospital Procurement Barriers in Donation. Procurement coordinators have access to critically ill patients during the course of medical treatment with no donation consent and with family or surrogates unaware of their roles. How these programs affect the medical care of these patients has not been studied. Conclusions: Policies enforcing end-of-life organ procurement can have unintended consequences: (1) erosion of care in the patient's best interests, (2) lack of transparency, and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of flawed standards of declaring death.

KW - Brain death

KW - Cardiac death

KW - Circulatory death

KW - Collaborative programs

KW - Death statute

KW - End of life

KW - Ethics

KW - Heart-beating donation

KW - Informed consent

KW - Legislations

KW - Non-heart-beating donation

KW - Organ donation

KW - Procurement coordinators

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955845115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955845115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 20678461

AN - SCOPUS:77955845115

VL - 81

SP - 1069

EP - 1078

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

IS - 9

ER -