Abstract
A cornerstone of the scientific ethos is that editorial board members should be selected based on their scholarly achievements, as demonstrated by publications in peer-reviewed journals and evidence that their work is of value to others in their disciplines. To discern if this reasoning is applied in practice, this study examined the scholarly records of the editorial boards of premier peer-reviewed journals sponsored by the leading professional associations in management and six related disciplines.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 211-238 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Organizational Research Methods |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2009 |
Keywords
- Bibiliometrics
- Infometrics
- Philosophy of science
- Scientific ethos
- Scientometrics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Decision Sciences(all)
- Strategy and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation