Science, values, and the political framing of indirect land use change (ILUC)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) refers to deforestation and agricultural expansion due to increased crop prices. It is a controversial spillover effect of biofuels that is estimated by "shocking" agricultural market models with high biofuel scenarios. The validity of this modeling is highly contested in biofuel regulation. As a case study of ILUC discourse, this chapter analyzes how ILUC science was interpreted and strategically framed during rulemaking for the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) in 2007-2009. The analysis covers three stages of the initial rulemaking process: academic advisory reports, agency rulemaking documents, and public comments. It finds that at every stage, stakeholders blended values-based and science-based arguments. Even when stakeholders framed their stances as firmly based on science, their interpretation of "right" action in the face of uncertainty also depended on normative values. The takeaway for policy-makers is that ILUC is not an issue where policy answers can be straightforwardly derived from science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationScience and the Law: How the Communication of Science Affects Policy Development in the Environment, Food, Health, and Transport Sectors
PublisherAmerican Chemical Society
Pages95-122
Number of pages28
Volume1207
ISBN (Print)9780841231085
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Publication series

NameACS Symposium Series
Volume1207
ISSN (Print)00976156
ISSN (Electronic)19475918

Fingerprint

Land use
Biofuels
Deforestation
Crops
Carbon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

Breetz, H. (2015). Science, values, and the political framing of indirect land use change (ILUC). In Science and the Law: How the Communication of Science Affects Policy Development in the Environment, Food, Health, and Transport Sectors (Vol. 1207, pp. 95-122). (ACS Symposium Series; Vol. 1207). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2015-1207.ch007

Science, values, and the political framing of indirect land use change (ILUC). / Breetz, Hanna.

Science and the Law: How the Communication of Science Affects Policy Development in the Environment, Food, Health, and Transport Sectors. Vol. 1207 American Chemical Society, 2015. p. 95-122 (ACS Symposium Series; Vol. 1207).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Breetz, H 2015, Science, values, and the political framing of indirect land use change (ILUC). in Science and the Law: How the Communication of Science Affects Policy Development in the Environment, Food, Health, and Transport Sectors. vol. 1207, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 1207, American Chemical Society, pp. 95-122. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2015-1207.ch007
Breetz H. Science, values, and the political framing of indirect land use change (ILUC). In Science and the Law: How the Communication of Science Affects Policy Development in the Environment, Food, Health, and Transport Sectors. Vol. 1207. American Chemical Society. 2015. p. 95-122. (ACS Symposium Series). https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2015-1207.ch007
Breetz, Hanna. / Science, values, and the political framing of indirect land use change (ILUC). Science and the Law: How the Communication of Science Affects Policy Development in the Environment, Food, Health, and Transport Sectors. Vol. 1207 American Chemical Society, 2015. pp. 95-122 (ACS Symposium Series).
@inbook{508b2be32f664c67b46a67f4aa331b0a,
title = "Science, values, and the political framing of indirect land use change (ILUC)",
abstract = "Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) refers to deforestation and agricultural expansion due to increased crop prices. It is a controversial spillover effect of biofuels that is estimated by {"}shocking{"} agricultural market models with high biofuel scenarios. The validity of this modeling is highly contested in biofuel regulation. As a case study of ILUC discourse, this chapter analyzes how ILUC science was interpreted and strategically framed during rulemaking for the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) in 2007-2009. The analysis covers three stages of the initial rulemaking process: academic advisory reports, agency rulemaking documents, and public comments. It finds that at every stage, stakeholders blended values-based and science-based arguments. Even when stakeholders framed their stances as firmly based on science, their interpretation of {"}right{"} action in the face of uncertainty also depended on normative values. The takeaway for policy-makers is that ILUC is not an issue where policy answers can be straightforwardly derived from science.",
author = "Hanna Breetz",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1021/bk-2015-1207.ch007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780841231085",
volume = "1207",
series = "ACS Symposium Series",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
pages = "95--122",
booktitle = "Science and the Law: How the Communication of Science Affects Policy Development in the Environment, Food, Health, and Transport Sectors",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Science, values, and the political framing of indirect land use change (ILUC)

AU - Breetz, Hanna

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) refers to deforestation and agricultural expansion due to increased crop prices. It is a controversial spillover effect of biofuels that is estimated by "shocking" agricultural market models with high biofuel scenarios. The validity of this modeling is highly contested in biofuel regulation. As a case study of ILUC discourse, this chapter analyzes how ILUC science was interpreted and strategically framed during rulemaking for the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) in 2007-2009. The analysis covers three stages of the initial rulemaking process: academic advisory reports, agency rulemaking documents, and public comments. It finds that at every stage, stakeholders blended values-based and science-based arguments. Even when stakeholders framed their stances as firmly based on science, their interpretation of "right" action in the face of uncertainty also depended on normative values. The takeaway for policy-makers is that ILUC is not an issue where policy answers can be straightforwardly derived from science.

AB - Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) refers to deforestation and agricultural expansion due to increased crop prices. It is a controversial spillover effect of biofuels that is estimated by "shocking" agricultural market models with high biofuel scenarios. The validity of this modeling is highly contested in biofuel regulation. As a case study of ILUC discourse, this chapter analyzes how ILUC science was interpreted and strategically framed during rulemaking for the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) in 2007-2009. The analysis covers three stages of the initial rulemaking process: academic advisory reports, agency rulemaking documents, and public comments. It finds that at every stage, stakeholders blended values-based and science-based arguments. Even when stakeholders framed their stances as firmly based on science, their interpretation of "right" action in the face of uncertainty also depended on normative values. The takeaway for policy-makers is that ILUC is not an issue where policy answers can be straightforwardly derived from science.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947906495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947906495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/bk-2015-1207.ch007

DO - 10.1021/bk-2015-1207.ch007

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780841231085

VL - 1207

T3 - ACS Symposium Series

SP - 95

EP - 122

BT - Science and the Law: How the Communication of Science Affects Policy Development in the Environment, Food, Health, and Transport Sectors

PB - American Chemical Society

ER -