Science Teaching Reform Through Professional Development: Teachers' Use of a Scientific Classroom Discourse Community Model

Elizabeth B. Lewis, Dale R. Baker, Brandon A. Helding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This report outlines a 2-year investigation into how secondary science teachers used professional development (PD) to build scientific classroom discourse communities (SCDCs). Observation data, teacher, student, and school demographic information were used to build a hierarchical linear model. The length of time that teachers received PD was the exclusive predictor of change over time, whereas a schools' percentage of low socioeconomic students predicted how PD concepts was initially implemented. Prior to PD teachers expressed a desire to increase opportunities for students to engage in SCDCs, but found some aspects more challenging than others to implement. Generally, there were three categories of the teachers' frequency of use of SCDC strategies: (a) most observed that required teachers to change their own communication, classroom management, and direct instruction; (b) occasionally observed that provided opportunities for greater oral and written discourse to facilitate students' meaning making of science; and (c) least observed that encouraged students' executive control of their learning and teachers' use of formative assessment in response to students' diverse learning needs. Teachers identified administrative support, PD strategies, and teacher collaboration as supports for implementation. However, they rated students' science knowledge, diverse language skills, and discourse abilities as the greatest barriers to implementing a SCDC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)896-931
Number of pages36
JournalScience Education
Volume99
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

classroom
reform
discourse
Teaching
teacher
science
community
student
Professional Development
Classroom Discourse
Discourse Community
linear model
development strategy
school
learning
student teacher
instruction
communication
ability
language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Science Teaching Reform Through Professional Development : Teachers' Use of a Scientific Classroom Discourse Community Model. / Lewis, Elizabeth B.; Baker, Dale R.; Helding, Brandon A.

In: Science Education, Vol. 99, No. 5, 01.09.2015, p. 896-931.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewis, Elizabeth B. ; Baker, Dale R. ; Helding, Brandon A. / Science Teaching Reform Through Professional Development : Teachers' Use of a Scientific Classroom Discourse Community Model. In: Science Education. 2015 ; Vol. 99, No. 5. pp. 896-931.
@article{2112f71361d24929b52e912e1f01bbc7,
title = "Science Teaching Reform Through Professional Development: Teachers' Use of a Scientific Classroom Discourse Community Model",
abstract = "This report outlines a 2-year investigation into how secondary science teachers used professional development (PD) to build scientific classroom discourse communities (SCDCs). Observation data, teacher, student, and school demographic information were used to build a hierarchical linear model. The length of time that teachers received PD was the exclusive predictor of change over time, whereas a schools' percentage of low socioeconomic students predicted how PD concepts was initially implemented. Prior to PD teachers expressed a desire to increase opportunities for students to engage in SCDCs, but found some aspects more challenging than others to implement. Generally, there were three categories of the teachers' frequency of use of SCDC strategies: (a) most observed that required teachers to change their own communication, classroom management, and direct instruction; (b) occasionally observed that provided opportunities for greater oral and written discourse to facilitate students' meaning making of science; and (c) least observed that encouraged students' executive control of their learning and teachers' use of formative assessment in response to students' diverse learning needs. Teachers identified administrative support, PD strategies, and teacher collaboration as supports for implementation. However, they rated students' science knowledge, diverse language skills, and discourse abilities as the greatest barriers to implementing a SCDC.",
author = "Lewis, {Elizabeth B.} and Baker, {Dale R.} and Helding, {Brandon A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/sce.21170",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "896--931",
journal = "Science Education",
issn = "0036-8326",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science Teaching Reform Through Professional Development

T2 - Teachers' Use of a Scientific Classroom Discourse Community Model

AU - Lewis, Elizabeth B.

AU - Baker, Dale R.

AU - Helding, Brandon A.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - This report outlines a 2-year investigation into how secondary science teachers used professional development (PD) to build scientific classroom discourse communities (SCDCs). Observation data, teacher, student, and school demographic information were used to build a hierarchical linear model. The length of time that teachers received PD was the exclusive predictor of change over time, whereas a schools' percentage of low socioeconomic students predicted how PD concepts was initially implemented. Prior to PD teachers expressed a desire to increase opportunities for students to engage in SCDCs, but found some aspects more challenging than others to implement. Generally, there were three categories of the teachers' frequency of use of SCDC strategies: (a) most observed that required teachers to change their own communication, classroom management, and direct instruction; (b) occasionally observed that provided opportunities for greater oral and written discourse to facilitate students' meaning making of science; and (c) least observed that encouraged students' executive control of their learning and teachers' use of formative assessment in response to students' diverse learning needs. Teachers identified administrative support, PD strategies, and teacher collaboration as supports for implementation. However, they rated students' science knowledge, diverse language skills, and discourse abilities as the greatest barriers to implementing a SCDC.

AB - This report outlines a 2-year investigation into how secondary science teachers used professional development (PD) to build scientific classroom discourse communities (SCDCs). Observation data, teacher, student, and school demographic information were used to build a hierarchical linear model. The length of time that teachers received PD was the exclusive predictor of change over time, whereas a schools' percentage of low socioeconomic students predicted how PD concepts was initially implemented. Prior to PD teachers expressed a desire to increase opportunities for students to engage in SCDCs, but found some aspects more challenging than others to implement. Generally, there were three categories of the teachers' frequency of use of SCDC strategies: (a) most observed that required teachers to change their own communication, classroom management, and direct instruction; (b) occasionally observed that provided opportunities for greater oral and written discourse to facilitate students' meaning making of science; and (c) least observed that encouraged students' executive control of their learning and teachers' use of formative assessment in response to students' diverse learning needs. Teachers identified administrative support, PD strategies, and teacher collaboration as supports for implementation. However, they rated students' science knowledge, diverse language skills, and discourse abilities as the greatest barriers to implementing a SCDC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939263111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939263111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sce.21170

DO - 10.1002/sce.21170

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939263111

VL - 99

SP - 896

EP - 931

JO - Science Education

JF - Science Education

SN - 0036-8326

IS - 5

ER -